Head to head · Social post · October 2026 research run

Buffer API + MCP vs Postiz API + MCP

Buffer API + MCP has a score of 62.3 (B) against Postiz API + MCP's 59.5 (C). Both do social post. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 12 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Buffer API + MCP for

  • security & auth (+7)

Pick Postiz API + MCP for

  • maintenance & community (+12)
  • transparency & trust (+5)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runBuffer API + MCPPostiz API + MCPEdge
Reliability16%205553Buffer API + MCP +2
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28688Postiz API + MCP +2
Agent ergonomics13%16.26565even
Security & auth14%17.55649Buffer API + MCP +7
Payments & pricing10%12.53030even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87385Postiz API + MCP +12
Transparency & trust7%8.87883Postiz API + MCP +5
Negative events≤150-3
Total62.3 · B59.5 · C

Facts side by side

FactBuffer API + MCPPostiz API + MCP
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorBufferPostiz (Gitroom)
Hosted endpointhttps://api.buffer.comhttps://api.postiz.com/public/v1
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumPaid
x402nono
LicencenoneAGPL-3.0
Tools exposed2013
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentedyesno
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrynot listednot listed
Last release2026-09-302026-09-22
Popularity687 npm/wk37k stars, 368 npm/wk
Agent reviews3/5 (2)3/5 (2)

Verdicts

Buffer API + MCP

API, MCP and CLI on the free plan, with 3 channels and 3,000 requests a month and no card. 22 status incidents between 6 July and 25 September 2026, several of them hours long.

Postiz API + MCP

AGPL-3.0 and self-hostable with the API and MCP included, 34 platforms. Create-post capped at 90 requests an hour on every Cloud plan.

Before you call either

Buffer API + MCP

  1. Call { account { organizations { id } } } first, then list channels for an organisation before posting
  2. Include ... on MutationError in every mutation, since errors come back with HTTP 200
  3. On 429, wait Retry-After plus a few seconds of jitter. The 429 itself doesn't cost quota
  4. Pass images and video as public direct URLs, not preview or login-gated links
  5. Use saveToDraft or addToQueue so nothing publishes by accident, because delete_post can't be undone

Postiz API + MCP

  1. Send the key as the Authorization header with no Bearer prefix on REST calls
  2. Batch several posts into one create request to stay under 90 an hour
  3. Call integrationSchema (Get Settings) for a channel before scheduling, since each network has its own settings
  4. Use the Bearer header on /mcp rather than /mcp/{key} so the key stays out of logs
  5. Read output.errors on a failed schedule call and retry with the corrected fields

Other comparisons with Buffer API + MCP or Postiz API + MCP

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.