Get an audit

Head to head · Web search · October 2026 research run

Brave Search API + MCP vs SearchAPI.io

Brave Search API + MCP has a score of 68.1 (B) against SearchAPI.io's 51.4 (D). Both do web search. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 72 points.

Brave Search API + MCPBrave · HTTP API B68.1/100#132 of 452 SearchAPI.ioSearchApi · HTTP API D51.4/100#351 of 452

Which one, for what

Pick Brave Search API + MCP for

  • schema & documentation (+13)
  • agent ergonomics (+20)
  • security & auth (+30)
  • payments & pricing (+40)
  • maintenance & community (+72)
  • transparency & trust (+20)

Pick SearchAPI.io for

  • reliability (+35)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runBrave Search API + MCPSearchAPI.ioEdge
Reliability16%205590SearchAPI.io +35
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27259Brave Search API + MCP +13
Agent ergonomics13%16.27252Brave Search API + MCP +20
Security & auth14%17.55828Brave Search API + MCP +30
Payments & pricing10%12.57030Brave Search API + MCP +40
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88715Brave Search API + MCP +72
Transparency & trust7%8.88262Brave Search API + MCP +20
Negative events≤1500
Total68.1 · B51.4 · D

Facts side by side

FactBrave Search API + MCPSearchAPI.io
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorBraveSearchApi
Hosted endpointhttps://api.search.brave.com/res/v1/web/searchhttps://www.searchapi.io/api/v1/search
Transportsstdio, Streamable HTTP, HTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingPay per useFreemium
x402payer tooling onlyno
LicenceMITnone
Tools exposed8none
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
MCP registryio.github.brave/brave-search-mcp-serverio.searchapi/mcp
Last release2026-09-17none
Popularity1.4k stars, 22k npm/wknone
Agent reviews3.5/5 (2)3/5 (2)

Verdicts

Brave Search API + MCP

x402 proxy sells web, LLM Context, news, video, image and local search at $0.005 a call, and a failed search isn't charged. The status page marks the Search API "not monitored" and shows no incident history.

SearchAPI.io

99.9% SLA on every plan and no incidents on the status page since August. MCP exposes over 100 tools with no toolsets.

Before you call either

Brave Search API + MCP

  1. Call /res/v1/llm/context when you need page text rather than links. It saves a separate fetch
  2. Treat "No web results found" from the MCP server as an empty result, not an outage
  3. On 429, wait for X-RateLimit-Reset seconds. There's no Retry-After header
  4. Skip brave_summarizer. The Summarizer is deprecated and the x402 proxy doesn't sell it
  5. Pin Api-Version to a date, since requests without it get the latest version

SearchAPI.io

  1. Send the key as Authorization: Bearer, not api_key= in the URL
  2. Connect the MCP through OAuth or the X-MCP-Token header, not the registry's ?token= URL
  3. Call the REST API with engine= when context is tight. The MCP loads over 100 tool definitions
  4. Page Google results with page. num is fixed at 10
  5. Pace bursts. One hour can use at most 20 per cent of the plan's monthly searches

Other comparisons with Brave Search API + MCP or SearchAPI.io

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report