Head to head · Storage share · October 2026 research run
Box API + MCP vs Tigris
Box API + MCP has a score of 69.6 (B) against Tigris's 44.6 (E). Both do storage share. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 41 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Box API + MCP for
- reliability (+30)
- schema & documentation (+41)
- agent ergonomics (+19)
- security & auth (+22)
- maintenance & community (+7)
- transparency & trust (+28)
Pick Tigris for
- payments & pricing (+5)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Box API + MCP | Tigris | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 65 | 35 | Box API + MCP +30 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 91 | 50 | Box API + MCP +41 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 72 | 53 | Box API + MCP +19 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 73 | 51 | Box API + MCP +22 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 25 | 30 | Tigris +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 84 | 77 | Box API + MCP +7 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 79 | 51 | Box API + MCP +28 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | 69.6 · B | 44.6 · E |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Box API + MCP | Tigris |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Box | Tigris Data |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.box.com/2.0 | https://t3.storage.dev |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Your plan | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Tools exposed | 57 | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | 2026-09-30 |
| Popularity | 199 stars, 216k npm/wk, 276k PyPI/wk | 4 stars, 20 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Box API + MCP
Public OpenAPI 3.0 spec with 297 operations, year-based API versions and an llms.txt of Markdown pages. 20 status-feed entries between 7 July and 1 October 2026, two of them over two hours on uploads or multiple services.
Tigris
No egress fees, and one endpoint (t3.storage.dev) with region auto for every location. 16 status incidents between 4 July and 2 October 2026, including outages in US regions on 31 July and 2 August.
Before you call either
Box API + MCP
- Call who_am_i first; the tool list depends on the plan, the admin's toggles and the scopes granted
- Expect download and upload URL, move and shared-link tools to be missing unless an admin has enabled them
- Pass fields= to trim responses and page folder listings with limit and marker
- Send a box-version header to pin an API version, and watch responses for a Deprecation header
- For a link that expires, set shared_link.unshared_at on a paid account; the free plan can't
Tigris
- Point the AWS SDK at https://t3.storage.dev with region
auto; the stdio MCP README still shows the older fly.storage.tigris.dev endpoint - Ask for an access key with a ReadOnly or ReadWrite role on one bucket rather than an org-wide key
- Keep presigned URLs short; Tigris accepts up to 90 days
- Don't call tigris_list_objects on a large bucket; it walks every object with no limit or prefix
- Use @tigrisdata/iam 2.6.0 or later before writing policies with conditions
Other comparisons with Box API + MCP or Tigris
- Amazon S3 vs Box API + MCP
- Backblaze B2 vs Box API + MCP
- Box API + MCP vs Cloudflare R2
- Dropbox API + MCP vs Tigris
- Google Drive API + MCP vs Tigris
- Amazon S3 vs Tigris
- Backblaze B2 vs Tigris
- Bunny Storage vs Tigris
- Cloudflare R2 vs Tigris
- Box API + MCP vs Dropbox API + MCP
- Box API + MCP vs Google Drive API + MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/box-api.json·/api/v1/tools/tigris.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/box-api-vs-tigris.md