Head to head · Exchange market data · October 2026 research run
Bitfinex API vs Hyperliquid
Bitfinex API scores 58.4 (C) on agent readiness against Hyperliquid's 50 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Hyperliquid leads on agent ergonomics and payments & pricing. Both do exchange market data.
Best crypto exchange APIs and MCP servers for AI agents · All 210 exchanges comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for An agent trading spot, margin or derivatives, or lending on the funding market, with scoped keys, official clients and paper trading.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 85 against 40
- Schema & documentation, 48 against 42
- Transparency & trust, 49 against 26
Watch for
No official MCP server, OpenAPI file or AsyncAPI file; the registry's Bitfinex servers are third parties proxying public market data
Best for An agent trading perpetuals or spot on chain from its own wallet with no account, or acting for a master account through an approved API wallet.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 70 against 61
- Payments & pricing, 55 against 40
Watch for
No official MCP server; the 23 registry entries are all third parties, several selling data by x402
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reliability Bitfinex API +45
Bitfinex API 85
Read with the hosted lines on the v2 API at api.bitfinex.com. bitfinex.statuspage.io is a Statuspage site with history back to May 2021 (20). Its feed has no entry between 25 March 2026 and 3 November 2026, so the last 90 days are clean on the record; the feed logs platform-wide outages only (a 14-hour maintenance in March 2026, a 3-hour outage in August 2025), so smaller incidents may go unrecorded. Judgement call (30). Rate limits with numbers, 10 to 90 a minute per IP and the WebSocket connection limits (15). ERR_RATE_LIMIT and the 60-second block are documented, with no Retry-After; orders take a cid but no idempotency key or retry guidance was found (10 of 15). No SLA found (0). Generally available (10). 20 + 30 + 15 + 10 + 0 + 10 = 85.
Hyperliquid 40
Read with the hosted lines on the REST API at api.hyperliquid.xyz, the surface an agent calls; the chain behind it is noted under details. No status page found in the docs, on hyperliquid.xyz or at status.hyperliquid.xyz, which did not resolve (0). No readable history (5). Rate limits documented with numbers per IP, per address and per WebSocket connection (15). When limited, an address gets one request every 10 seconds; no 429 shape or Retry-After is documented, but cloid, per-signer nonces, expiresAfter and noop make retries safe (10 of 15). No SLA (0). Mainnet is generally available (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 10 + 0 + 10 = 40.
Transparency & trust Bitfinex API +23
Bitfinex API 49
The editorial half. A closed service whose Exchange Terms and API Terms of Service loaded only navigation, so the licence terms are unknown; the clients are MIT and Apache-2.0 (8 of 30). The privacy statement loaded only navigation, so retention and data handling are unchecked (0 of 30). The docs say v1 will be deprecated "at some point in the future" with no date, and the Python client's 4.0.0 removed endpoints with a release note (5 of 20). Subprocessors and data locations are in the unread privacy statement (0). 8 + 0 + 5 + 0 = 13.
Hyperliquid 26
The editorial half. The SDKs are MIT and the node repository Apache-2.0 with a Dockerfile around a binary; the API servers and front end are closed and the terms were unreadable (12 of 30). No privacy policy read and nothing in the docs on data handling (0 of 30). Deprecated actions are marked in the docs without dates or a policy (8 of 20). No subprocessors or data locations (0 of 20). Total 20.
Payments & pricing Hyperliquid +15
Bitfinex API 40
No machine payment protocol (0). The fees page is public without login (20), though it shows zero maker and taker with no tiers or date. The API is free, public endpoints need no account, and paper trading needs no money (20). A person must sign up in a browser with identity checks and mint the key (0). 0 + 20 + 20 + 0 = 40.
Hyperliquid 55
No machine payment protocol (0). Fees published per tier without login (20). No card anywhere; public info endpoints are free and the testnet faucet gives 1,000 mock USDC, though only to an address that has deposited on mainnet (15 of 20). No signup; an agent with a funded EVM wallet deposits USDC on a bridged chain and trades, subject to the unread terms (20). Total 55.
Agent ergonomics Hyperliquid +9
Bitfinex API 61
Graded on the REST API. Limits on trades, candles and book depth, and pub:list config endpoints keep responses small, but positional arrays make every field a lookup (14 of 25). start, end, limit and sort on history endpoints and per-symbol variants (16 of 20). ERR_RATE_LIMIT is actionable; authenticated 400s return {} and withdrawal status strings may change, so an agent cannot branch on causes (8 of 20). A client id on orders, order multi-op and cancel-multiple, but no idempotency key and no retry contract (8 of 20). Few required parameters and official clients in Node, Python, Go and Ruby (15). 14 + 16 + 8 + 8 + 15 = 61.
Hyperliquid 70
An API, read for response sizing. Time-range calls return at most 500 blocks of data, fills and historical orders cap at 2,000 items, candles at 5,000, l2Book at 20 levels a side (18 of 25). Cursor-by-timestamp pagination on fills and funding, filtering by coin or dex, no field selection (14 of 20). Order errors are documented strings per order, one batch-level error rejects a batch, and orderStatus answers unknownOid; no codes and no rate-limit error shape (12 of 20). cloid, per-signer nonces within a time window, expiresAfter, noop to burn a nonce and scheduleCancel as a dead man's switch (18 of 20). Few required fields, but signing needs msgpack field order, two EIP-712 schemes and lowercase addresses, and the official SDKs are Python (Alpha) and Rust only (8 of 15). Total 70.
Schema & documentation Bitfinex API +6
Bitfinex API 48
No OpenAPI or AsyncAPI file was found on docs.bitfinex.com, in llms.txt or in the client repositories (0). llms.txt and a .md twin of every docs page (10). Each reference page states the endpoint's purpose and fields, and the introduction says when to use api-pub against api, but nothing says when not to use an endpoint (14 of 20). Responses are positional arrays described in field tables, inputs are typed in prose with some enumerations (wallet names, order types) and required fields marked; the withdrawal CODE field is work in progress (7 of 15). Signed-request recipes in five languages, but authenticated errors are documented as 400 with an empty object and there is no error reference (9 of 15). Version v2 in the path and a dated changelog, whose last entry is October 2024 and whose v1 deprecation has no date (8 of 15). 0 + 10 + 14 + 7 + 9 + 8 = 48.
Hyperliquid 42
No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract; request and response shapes are tables and JSON examples in the docs (0 of 25). llms.txt and a Markdown twin of every page by appending .md (10). Each info type and exchange action has a short description of what it does, and the signing page lists common mistakes, but little says when to use one call over another (12 of 20). Fields are one-letter keys (a, b, p, s, r, t, c) with numbers as strings, enums such as tif Alo, Ioc or Gtc, and required fields marked in tables (9 of 15). An example for every call and a list of order and cancel error strings, with no HTTP error table (11 of 15). No API version, no changelog and no dated release notes; deprecated actions such as userDexAbstraction are marked in place (0 of 15). Total 42.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Bitfinex API | Hyperliquid | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 85 | 40 | Bitfinex API +45 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 48 | 42 | Bitfinex API +6 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 61 | 70 | Hyperliquid +9 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 62 | 64 | Hyperliquid +2 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 55 | Hyperliquid +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 41 | 39 | Bitfinex API +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 49 | 26 | Bitfinex API +23 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 58.4/100 | D 50/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Bitfinex API | Hyperliquid |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | iFinex Inc. | Hyperliquid Labs |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted API under Bitfinex's API Terms of Service, which our reader couldn't load. The official client libraries (Node, Python, Go, Ruby) are MIT or Apache-2.0 | The exchange runs on the Hyperliquid chain (HyperCore), whose node is distributed as a binary under an Apache-2.0 repository; the Python and Rust SDKs are MIT. The API servers and front end are closed |
| Tools exposed | none | 0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-07-18 | 2026-06-04 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 480 stars | 1.9k stars, 167k PyPI/wk |
Verdicts
Bitfinex API
Bitfinex gives an agent scoped keys with a separate withdraw permission, paper-trading sub-accounts on the production API, llms.txt and official clients in four languages. There is no official MCP server, responses are positional arrays with empty error bodies, rate limits run 10 to 90 a minute per IP, and the terms, API terms and privacy statement could not be read.
Hyperliquid
Hyperliquid's API needs no signup or key, an approved API wallet can trade but not withdraw, fees and rate limits are published with numbers, and a testnet mirrors mainnet. There is no official MCP server, OpenAPI file, status page, changelog or readable terms, and signing uses two schemes the docs say to leave to an SDK.
Before you call either
Bitfinex API
- Mint a key with read on the scopes the task needs and write only on
orders; never grantwithdrawto a trading key, and bind the key to known IPs - Use one key per client process, since each key keeps its own strictly increasing nonce and a reused nonce is rejected
- Rehearse on a paper-trading sub-account with the TEST symbols before touching real balances; the sub-account cannot be converted later
- Plan requests against the per-endpoint limit of 10 to 90 a minute per IP;
ERR_RATE_LIMITblocks the IP for 60 seconds with no Retry-After - Map each response by position from the docs' field tables and set a
cidon orders, because responses are arrays and a 400 carries no reason
Hyperliquid
- Generate a fresh API wallet, approve it with
approveAgentwith a name and expiry, sign with it, and query with the master address, never the agent address - Use the Python SDK's
sign_l1_actionandsign_user_signed_action; mixing the two, field order in msgpack or an uppercase address gives "User or API Wallet ... does not exist" - Set a
cloidon every order and read the per-orderstatusesarray; one batch-level error rejects the whole batch - Budget address limits by volume (one action per 1 USDC traded after 10,000); batch orders to lower IP weight, and use WebSocket for data
- Arm
scheduleCancelbefore unattended trading so open orders are cancelled if the agent stops
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Bitfinex API or Hyperliquid?
Bitfinex API scores 58.4 (C) on agent readiness against Hyperliquid's 50 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Hyperliquid leads on agent ergonomics and payments & pricing.
Do Bitfinex API and Hyperliquid need an API key?
Bitfinex API needs an API key. Hyperliquid takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Bitfinex API and Hyperliquid without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for Bitfinex API. No hosted endpoint is listed for Hyperliquid.
Other comparisons with Bitfinex API or Hyperliquid
- Bitfinex API vs Bitget
- Bitfinex API vs Bithumb Open API
- Bitfinex API vs Bitstamp API
- Bitfinex API vs Bybit
- Bitfinex API vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API
- Bitfinex API vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)
- Bitfinex API vs Crypto.com Exchange API
- Bitfinex API vs Deribit
- Bitfinex API vs dYdX
- Bitfinex API vs Gate
- Bitfinex API vs Gemini Exchange API
- Bitfinex API vs HTX trading API
- Bitfinex API vs Kraken API
- Bitfinex API vs KuCoin
- Bitfinex API vs MEXC API
- Bitfinex API vs OKX API
- Bitfinex API vs Uniswap Trading API
- Bitfinex API vs Upbit Open API
- Bitget vs Hyperliquid
- Bithumb Open API vs Hyperliquid
- Bitstamp API vs Hyperliquid
- Bybit vs Hyperliquid
- Crypto.com Exchange API vs Hyperliquid
- Gate vs Hyperliquid
- Gemini Exchange API vs Hyperliquid
- HTX trading API vs Hyperliquid
- Hyperliquid vs Upbit Open API
- Binance API vs Bitfinex API
- Binance API vs Hyperliquid
- Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs Hyperliquid
- Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs Hyperliquid
- Hyperliquid vs Uniswap Trading API
- Deribit vs Hyperliquid
- dYdX vs Hyperliquid
- Hyperliquid vs Kraken API
- Hyperliquid vs KuCoin
- Hyperliquid vs MEXC API
- Hyperliquid vs OKX API
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/bitfinex-vs-hyperliquid.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/bitfinex.json·/api/v1/tools/hyperliquid.json - From a terminal
anchor compare bitfinex hyperliquid(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "bitfinex", "b": "hyperliquid"}at/mcp, no key