Head to head · Geocoding · October 2026 research run
Azure Maps vs Nominatim
Azure Maps scores 67.1 (B) on agent readiness against Nominatim's 63.5 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Nominatim leads on payments & pricing. Both do geocoding.
Best maps, geocoding and places APIs for AI agents · All 153 maps comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams already on Azure that want geocoding and routing under Entra ID roles and one flat price.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 83 against 51
- Security & auth, 66 against 50
- Transparency & trust, 75 against 59
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
Place and category search exist only in Search 1.0. Search 2026-01-01, which supersedes it, has geocoding, autocomplete, reverse geocoding and polygons
Best for Self-hosted worldwide geocoding from OpenStreetMap data with no per-call cost or storage limits beyond ODbL.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 20
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Open source
Watch for
No OpenAPI spec and no llms.txt
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Payments & pricing Nominatim +40
Azure Maps 20
No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Per-1,000-transaction prices are public without a login through the Azure Retail Prices API, $4.50 on each Gen2 meter. The pricing page showed our reader the free amounts but no dollar figures (20), re-read on 1 November. Free monthly transactions exist, 5,000 for search and 1,000 for routing, but an Azure account asks for a card to verify identity (0). A person signs up in a browser and creates the Maps account (0). 0+20+0+0 = 20.
Nominatim 60
Self-hosted rule. No payment protocol (0). Free software with nothing to buy (20 + 20 + 20). The public instance is also free and keyless, within its usage policy. 0+20+20+20 = 60.
Schema & documentation Azure Maps +32
Azure Maps 83
OpenAPI 2.0 documents for each service are public in Azure/azure-rest-api-specs, generated from TypeSpec since April 2026 (25). learn.microsoft.com returns each page as Markdown when ?accept=text/markdown is added, though llms.txt returns 404 (10). Operation descriptions state purpose, and the geocoding and migration pages say when to use geocoding, autocomplete or batch and when not to (16 of 20). Typed parameters with ranges such as top from 1 to 20, 18 enums in the Search document and 48 in Route, and required fields marked (13 of 15). Examples on all 16 Search and Route operations, but errors are one default response with an x-ms-error-code header and no list of codes found (10 of 15). Dated api-version values and migration guides for Search, Route, Render and Traffic 1.0, but no API changelog page. The release notes cover the Web SDK only (9 of 15). 25+10+16+13+10+9 = 83.
Nominatim 51
No OpenAPI or machine-readable contract (0). nominatim.org/llms.txt returns 404, and the manual is HTML, though its Markdown sources sit in the repository's docs folder (0). The API reference explains each endpoint and parameter and when not to use one, such as the details endpoint being for debugging (14). Types, enums and limits are documented, such as format, layer and limit (at most 40), but there's no schema to validate against (12). Example queries and outputs per endpoint, with errors described in prose (10). A versioned manual per release, a ChangeLog and a migration guide (15). 0+0+14+12+10+15 = 51.
Security & auth Azure Maps +16
Azure Maps 66
Microsoft Entra ID OAuth tokens with Azure roles, SAS tokens limited to 24 hours with a rate cap and allowed regions, and two subscription keys that can be regenerated in turn (30). Less 10 because the authentication guide tells callers to add the subscription key as a URL parameter, and Search 1.0 declares the key as a query parameter (20). Built-in reader roles, custom roles down to one service such as Microsoft.Maps/accounts/services/search/read, and disableLocalAuth to turn keys off. The data-plane APIs only read. A subscription key reaches every API on the account (18 of 20). Place names, addresses and traffic incident text come from third parties, and no prompt-injection guidance was found (5 of 15). Azure Monitor metrics show usage, errors and availability for 93 days. Per-request logs were not found in the Azure Maps docs (6 of 15). MSRC coordinated disclosure and bounty policies, and Azure Maps is on the FedRAMP High audit scope list dated 21 September 2026. The microsoft.com security.txt passed its Expires date on 23 September 2026 and still carries it on 1 November, and we did not confirm Maps on a SOC 2 scope list. An MSRC search on 1 November finds no CVE naming Azure Maps since November 2025 (17 of 20). 20+18+5+6+17 = 66.
Nominatim 50
The server has no authentication of its own; an operator puts it behind their own proxy. The public instance takes no key and identifies callers by User-Agent or Referer (5). Every endpoint reads, so there's nothing to approve (18). Results are OpenStreetMap names and tags, community-edited text, with no prompt-injection guidance (7). Query logging to a file is available through NOMINATIM_LOG_FILE and off by default (8). SECURITY.md gives security@nominatim.org, an acknowledgement within 3 work days, a disclosure process and two years of security updates per release. No bug bounty (12). 5+18+7+8+12 = 50.
Transparency & trust Azure Maps +16
Azure Maps 75
Closed service under Microsoft's Product Terms, which carry a section of Azure Maps rules on storage, navigation and attribution, with MIT client libraries (15 of 30). The docs say requests and input data are stored only in the chosen geography and that queries go to TomTom without a link to the customer. No retention period for request data was found, and we did not read the Data Protection Addendum (22 of 30). The Modern Lifecycle Policy promises 12 months' notice before support ends. Gen1 pricing and Render 1.0 retired on stated dates in September 2026, while Search 1.0 is superseded with no date (16 of 20). TomTom is named as a subprocessor, and European and United States endpoints fix the data location. The full sub-processor list sits on the Service Trust Portal, which we did not read (16 of 20). 15+22+16+16 = 69.
Nominatim 59
Open source, GPL-3.0-or-later for the Python code, GPL-2.0 for other files and Apache-2.0 for the osm2pgsql Lua styles (30). A self-hosted server keeps data where the operator runs it. The public instance falls under the OSMF privacy policy and asks users not to send personal data. We didn't read the OSMF policy itself (20). SECURITY.md lists the end of security support for each release line with dates, and a migration guide covers each version (16). No telemetry found in the settings, and request logging is opt-in (15). 30+20+16+15 = 81.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Azure Maps | Nominatim | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 81 | 82 | Nominatim +1 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 83 | 51 | Azure Maps +32 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 73 | 75 | Nominatim +2 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 66 | 50 | Azure Maps +16 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 60 | Nominatim +40 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 57 | 60 | Nominatim +3 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 75 | 59 | Azure Maps +16 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 67.1/100 | B 63.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Azure Maps | Nominatim |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Microsoft | Nominatim project (osm-search) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://atlas.microsoft.com | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Price for geocoding | $4.50 per 1,000 requests | free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Microsoft's Product Terms. The Azure SDK client libraries are MIT | GPL-3.0-or-later |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-10-14 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-01 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 9.1k npm/wk, 25k PyPI/wk | 2.1k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
Nominatim
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Azure Maps
Azure Maps publishes OpenAPI documents for every service, per-service rate limits, a 99.9 per cent SLA and written rules on storing results, and Entra ID roles can limit a caller to one service. Place search exists only in Search 1.0, which the newer version has superseded, and the REST client libraries are all beta.
Nominatim
Nominatim is the open-source OpenStreetMap geocoder, free to run with a documented search, reverse and lookup API, tested releases and two years of security support per release. It has no OpenAPI spec, no built-in authentication, and the public instance allows one request a second and restricts LLM-suggested use, so agents at scale need their own server.
Before you call either
Azure Maps
- Send the key in the
subscription-keyheader, or useAuthorization: Bearerwithx-ms-client-id. The key also works as a URL parameter, which leaks into logs. - Call
GET /geocode?api-version=2026-01-01for addresses. It can return 200 with no results, so checkconfidence,matchCodesand the entity type before use. - Use Search 1.0 (
/search/poi/json,/search/nearby/json,/search/fuzzy/json) for places. The 2026-01-01 version has no place search. - Use
eu.atlas.microsoft.comorus.atlas.microsoft.comto keep request data in that geography. - Don't store route or tile results beyond six months, and never for serving several users. The product terms allow keeping geocodes while the account is active.
Nominatim
- Don't send bulk or repeated queries to nominatim.openstreetmap.org; keep to one request a second, cache results and set an identifying User-Agent
- Tell the user about the OSMF usage policy before suggesting the public instance, as the policy requires
- For regular or large jobs, run your own Nominatim or use a commercial provider listed on the Nominatim wiki
- Pass format=jsonv2 or geojson and limit, since omitting format sends the request to the web UI
- Attribute OpenStreetMap and respect the ODbL share-alike terms when storing results
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Azure Maps or Nominatim?
Azure Maps scores 67.1 (B) on agent readiness against Nominatim's 63.5 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Nominatim leads on payments & pricing.
Which is cheaper for geocoding, Azure Maps or Nominatim?
Nominatim, at free against $4.50 per 1,000 requests for Azure Maps. These are the vendors' published prices for the job.
Do Azure Maps and Nominatim need an API key?
Azure Maps takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Nominatim needs no key.
Can an agent call Azure Maps and Nominatim without installing anything?
Azure Maps has a hosted endpoint at https://atlas.microsoft.com. No hosted endpoint is listed for Nominatim.
Are Azure Maps and Nominatim open source?
No open-source release is listed for Azure Maps. Nominatim is open source (GPL-3.0-or-later).
Other comparisons with Azure Maps or Nominatim
- Amazon Location Service vs Azure Maps
- Amazon Location Service vs Nominatim
- ArcGIS Location Platform vs Azure Maps
- ArcGIS Location Platform vs Nominatim
- Azure Maps vs Geoapify Location Platform + MCP
- Azure Maps vs Geocodio
- Azure Maps vs Google Maps Platform + Grounding Lite MCP
- Azure Maps vs HERE Location Services
- Azure Maps vs LocationIQ
- Azure Maps vs Mapbox APIs + MCP
- Azure Maps vs MapQuest
- Azure Maps vs MapTiler Cloud
- Azure Maps vs NextBillion.ai
- Azure Maps vs OpenCage Geocoding API
- Azure Maps vs Radar
- Azure Maps vs Stadia Maps
- Azure Maps vs TomTom Maps APIs + MCP
- Azure Maps vs Woosmap
- Geoapify Location Platform + MCP vs Nominatim
- Geocodio vs Nominatim
- Google Maps Platform + Grounding Lite MCP vs Nominatim
- HERE Location Services vs Nominatim
- LocationIQ vs Nominatim
- Mapbox APIs + MCP vs Nominatim
- MapQuest vs Nominatim
- MapTiler Cloud vs Nominatim
- NextBillion.ai vs Nominatim
- Nominatim vs OpenCage Geocoding API
- Nominatim vs Radar
- Nominatim vs Stadia Maps
- Nominatim vs TomTom Maps APIs + MCP
- Nominatim vs Woosmap
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/azure-maps-vs-nominatim.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/azure-maps.json·/api/v1/tools/nominatim.json - From a terminal
anchor compare azure-maps nominatim(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "azure-maps", "b": "nominatim"}at/mcp, no key