Head to head · Guard injection · October 2026 research run

Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) vs LlamaFirewall

Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) scores 60.7 (C) on agent readiness against LlamaFirewall's 50.8 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. LlamaFirewall leads on payments & pricing. Both do guard injection.

Which one, for what

Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) C

Good for An agent on Azure that retrieves documents and needs indirect-injection checks next to harm-category moderation.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 69 against 49
  • Agent ergonomics, 78 against 60
  • Security & auth, 74 against 56
  • Maintenance & community, 45 against 15
  • Transparency & trust, 80 against 58

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

Needs an Azure subscription with a card, a resource and a region that has the feature, before the first call

LlamaFirewall D

Good for A Python agent team that wants injection, hidden-character and generated-code checks in process, is willing to pin dependencies or install from main, and can get the gated weights.

Ahead on

  • Payments & pricing, 50 against 15

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Open source

Watch for

No PyPI release since 1.0.3 on 29 May 2025, and no changelog, tags or deprecation notes were found

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAzure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields)LlamaFirewallEdge
Reliability16%205553Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) +2
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26949Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) +20
Agent ergonomics13%16.27860Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) +18
Security & auth14%17.57456Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) +18
Payments & pricing10%12.51550LlamaFirewall +35
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.84515Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) +30
Transparency & trust7%8.88058Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) +22
Negative events≤1500
Total60.7 · C50.8 · D

Facts side by side

FactAzure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields)LlamaFirewall
KindHTTP APIAgent framework
VendorMicrosoft AzureMeta
Hosted endpointhttps://{resource}.cognitiveservices.azure.com/contentsafety/text:shieldPromptno (local only)
TransportsHTTP
AuthOAuth or keyNone
PricingFreemiumFree
x402nono
LicencenoneMIT (library). The Prompt Guard 2 weights it downloads are under the Llama 4 Community Licence
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-09-012025-05-29
Terms last updatedcouldn't be readno document linked
Privacy policy last updated2026-09-01no document linked
Customer content may train modelsyes
Terms restrict automated accesscouldn't be read
Terms restrict benchmarkingcouldn't be read
Terms or service can change without noticecouldn't be read
Arbitration or class-action waivercouldn't be read
Popularity17k npm/wk, 218k PyPI/wk4.4k stars, 1k PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3/5 (2)none

Verdicts

Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields)

Prompt Shields checks up to five retrieved documents for indirect injection, not only the user prompt. Needs an Azure subscription with a card, a resource and a region that has the feature, before the first call.

LlamaFirewall

One scan() call runs several checks on the owner's machine and returns a short typed result. The last PyPI release is 1.0.3 from 29 May 2025, and its Prompt Guard loader imports a huggingface_hub class that current versions no longer export, so a fresh install needs older pins. The classifier weights also need Meta's manual approval.

Before you call either

Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields)

  1. Send retrieved pages and tool results in the documents array of shieldPrompt, not in userPrompt, so document attacks are reported separately
  2. Call text:shieldPrompt over REST with api-version=2024-09-01. The Python SDK 1.0.0 has no method for it
  3. Keep each request under 10,000 characters across prompt and documents, and split long tool results
  4. Create the resource in a region that lists Prompt Shields, since not every region has it
  5. On F0 you get 5 requests a second. Queue checks or move to S0 before load testing

LlamaFirewall

  1. Pin huggingface_hub below 1.0 and a matching transformers 4.x before importing the Prompt Guard scanner from the 1.0.3 wheel, or install from main
  2. Get access to meta-llama/Llama-Prompt-Guard-2-86M and set a Hugging Face token first. Without one the loader prompts for a login and a headless run stalls
  3. Call scan_async inside a running event loop. scan() wraps asyncio.run and fails there. scan_async returns score 0.0 and reason default on every allow
  4. Split text longer than 512 tokens yourself before a Prompt Guard scan. The library truncates and does not chunk
  5. Do not feed a block reason back to the model. The Prompt Guard reason quotes the full scanned text, and the hidden ASCII reason decodes the hidden payload

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) or LlamaFirewall?

Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) scores 60.7 (C) on agent readiness against LlamaFirewall's 50.8 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. LlamaFirewall leads on payments & pricing.

Can an agent call Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) and LlamaFirewall without installing anything?

Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) has a hosted endpoint at https://{resource}.cognitiveservices.azure.com/contentsafety/text:shieldPrompt. No hosted endpoint is listed for LlamaFirewall.

Are Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) and LlamaFirewall open source?

No open-source release is listed for Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields). LlamaFirewall is open source (MIT (library). The Prompt Guard 2 weights it downloads are under the Llama 4 Community Licence).

Other comparisons with Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) or LlamaFirewall

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.