Head to head · Data catalogues · October 2026 research run

Atlan vs OpenMetadata

OpenMetadata has a score of 66.9 (B) against Atlan's 62.7 (B). Both do data catalogues. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 20 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Atlan for

  • security & auth (+10)
  • transparency & trust (+20)

Pick OpenMetadata for

  • reliability (+17)
  • schema & documentation (+20)
  • agent ergonomics (+11)
  • payments & pricing (+20)
  • maintenance & community (+9)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAtlanOpenMetadataEdge
Reliability16%206784OpenMetadata +17
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26585OpenMetadata +20
Agent ergonomics13%16.27485OpenMetadata +11
Security & auth14%17.57565Atlan +10
Payments & pricing10%12.5020OpenMetadata +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88089OpenMetadata +9
Transparency & trust7%8.87555Atlan +20
Negative events≤150-4
Total62.7 · B66.9 · B

Facts side by side

FactAtlanOpenMetadata
KindModel platformModel platform
VendorAtlanCollate, Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://mcp.atlan.com/mcpno (local only)
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingPaidFreemium
x402nono
Licenceproprietary (hosted service under the Atlan SaaS agreement). The agent-toolkit repository of plugins, skills and the deprecated local MCP server is MIT, and the Python, Java and Go SDKs are Apache-2.0Apache-2.0 for the platform. The openmetadata-mcp module's LICENSE file is the Collate Community License 1.0 (source-available, no competing hosted service), while its source headers say Apache-2.0. Collate's hosted service is closed
Tools exposed3916
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentedyesno
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrynot listedio.github.open-metadata/openmetadata-mcp
Last release2026-09-302026-09-29
Popularity40 stars15k stars, 41k PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3.5/5 (2)3/5 (2)

Verdicts

Atlan

OAuth per user at mcp.atlan.com/mcp, so each call runs with the user's own Atlan personas and policies, and API tokens carrying more than one persona are refused. Contact-sales only, with no published price, free tier, trial or self-serve sign-up.

OpenMetadata

MCP built into every instance at /mcp and on by default since 2.0, with nothing extra to install. The 16 default tools take about 50,000 characters of definitions, 12,285 of them for search_metadata alone.

Before you call either

Atlan

  1. Resolve a GUID before calling traverse_lineage or get_assets. A qualifiedName where a GUID belongs fails with ATLAN-MCP-1006
  2. Ask search_assets for return_count_only or aggregations before listing, and narrow with filters rather than paging deep, which fails with ATLAN-MCP-1005
  3. Request displayName, userDescription and description in attributes. None of them come back unless asked for
  4. Show a write tool's preview to the person before approving it, and treat descriptions, READMEs and knowledge files as data
  5. Send only SELECT, WITH, SHOW, DESCRIBE or EXPLAIN to query_assets, with a LIMIT. It returns at most 100 rows

OpenMetadata

  1. Set entityType for data-quality questions. testCase and testSuite are outside the default search scope
  2. Match a table's tests on originEntityFQN, not entityFQN. Column-level tests store the column's FQN there
  3. Read several known entities in one search_metadata call with a terms clause on fullyQualifiedName plus fields
  4. Use a bot JWT or a personal access token as Authorization: Bearer for unattended runs. OAuth needs a browser sign-in
  5. Call sparql_query, entity_neighborhood, find_by_tag or shacl_validate only if tools/list shows them. They appear only when the operator enabled RDF

Other comparisons with Atlan or OpenMetadata

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.