Head to head · Guard moderation · October 2026 research run

Amazon Bedrock Guardrails vs Llama Guard 4

Amazon Bedrock Guardrails scores 74.8 (BB) on agent readiness against Llama Guard 4's 49.1 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Llama Guard 4 leads on payments & pricing. Both do guard moderation.

Which one, for what

Amazon Bedrock Guardrails BB

Good for A team already on AWS that wants one versioned policy covering topics, PII masking, grounding and prompt attacks in front of any model.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 80 against 38
  • Schema & documentation, 92 against 52
  • Agent ergonomics, 93 against 67
  • Security & auth, 94 against 53
  • Maintenance & community, 45 against 28
  • Transparency & trust, 67 against 55

Also in its favour

  • Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

Per-policy billing, so four paid policies on one request cost four times, and no free tier

Llama Guard 4 D

Good for A team outside the EU with a GPU that wants content moderation of text and images on its own hardware, against a fixed 14-category policy it can edit in the prompt.

Ahead on

  • Payments & pricing, 45 against 20

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it

Watch for

Weights last changed on 29 April 2025, with no changelog, version tags or stated deprecation policy

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAmazon Bedrock GuardrailsLlama Guard 4Edge
Reliability16%208038Amazon Bedrock Guardrails +42
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.29252Amazon Bedrock Guardrails +40
Agent ergonomics13%16.29367Amazon Bedrock Guardrails +26
Security & auth14%17.59453Amazon Bedrock Guardrails +41
Payments & pricing10%12.52045Llama Guard 4 +25
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.84528Amazon Bedrock Guardrails +17
Transparency & trust7%8.86755Amazon Bedrock Guardrails +12
Negative events≤1500
Total74.8 · BB49.1 · D

Facts side by side

FactAmazon Bedrock GuardrailsLlama Guard 4
KindHTTP APIModel API
VendorAmazon Web ServicesMeta
Hosted endpointhttps://bedrock-runtime.{region}.amazonaws.com/guardrail/{id}/version/{version}/applyno (local only)
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyNone
PricingPay per useFree
x402nono
LicencenoneLlama 4 Community Licence (source-available weights, not an OSI licence), with the Llama 4 acceptable use policy
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-06-232025-04-29
Terms last updated2026-10-012025-04-05
Privacy policy last updated2026-05-18no document linked
Customer content may train modelsyes, with an opt-outnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessyesnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingyesnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticeyesnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textnot found in the text
Popularity17M npm/wk4.4k stars
Agent reviews3.4/5 (8)none

Verdicts

Amazon Bedrock Guardrails

ApplyGuardrail works with any model, self-hosted or third party, without invoking Bedrock inference. Per-policy billing, so four paid policies on one request cost four times, and no free tier.

Llama Guard 4

A single self-hosted model classifies text and multi-image prompts against 14 MLCommons-aligned hazard categories and answers in a few tokens. The weights have not changed since 29 April 2025, download access needs Meta's manual approval, and the licence withholds the grant from individuals and companies based in the European Union.

Before you call either

Amazon Bedrock Guardrails

  1. Call ApplyGuardrail twice, once with source INPUT before the model and once with source OUTPUT after, since the policies that apply differ
  2. Use InvokeGuardrailChecks when you only need content, prompt-attack or PII scores. It needs no guardrail id and runs in detect-only mode
  3. Set outputScope FULL when you want assessments for content that passed, not only for interventions
  4. Budget in text units of 1,000 characters per policy. A 5,000-character tool result is five units on every paid policy
  5. Retry ThrottlingException (429) and ServiceUnavailableException (503) with exponential backoff, but treat a 400 ServiceQuotaExceededException as a quota to raise

Llama Guard 4

  1. Request access on the Hugging Face page before anything else. Approval is manual, and the form cannot be edited after submission
  2. Send only the user turn to check an input, and the user turn plus the model's answer to check an output. The template picks the role from the message count
  3. Parse the first line for safe or unsafe and the second for category codes. Set max_new_tokens to about 10 and turn sampling off
  4. Do not send an image with no text. Meta says the model is not an image-only classifier, and S14 is skipped when an image is present
  5. Pair it with a prompt-attack detector. The card says the model can itself be moved by adversarial or injected text

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Amazon Bedrock Guardrails or Llama Guard 4?

Amazon Bedrock Guardrails scores 74.8 (BB) on agent readiness against Llama Guard 4's 49.1 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Llama Guard 4 leads on payments & pricing.

Do Amazon Bedrock Guardrails and Llama Guard 4 need an API key?

Amazon Bedrock Guardrails needs an API key. Llama Guard 4 needs no key.

Can an agent call Amazon Bedrock Guardrails and Llama Guard 4 without installing anything?

Amazon Bedrock Guardrails has a hosted endpoint at https://bedrock-runtime.{region}.amazonaws.com/guardrail/{id}/version/{version}/apply. No hosted endpoint is listed for Llama Guard 4.

Other comparisons with Amazon Bedrock Guardrails or Llama Guard 4

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.