Head to head · Tool access for agents · October 2026 research run

AgentWeb vs SandBase

SandBase scores 61.1 (C) on agent readiness against AgentWeb's 49.9 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Both do tool access for agents.

Best agent tool access platforms · All 66 tool access comparisons

Which one, for what

AgentWeb D

Best for Agents that need to act on consumer and business websites without an official API (shopping, food delivery, flights, LinkedIn), where a pre-mapped action is cheaper than driving a browser.

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

No public changelog, no source and no official SDK; the API and the registry entry are at 0.9.0

SandBase C

Best for A gateway for agents that need third-party models, media generation and structured data (social platforms, search, SEO, e-commerce, finance) from one capped balance, found at run time by need and price, with OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini and E2B-compatible endpoints on one key.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 63 against 30
  • Maintenance & community, 68 against 20

Also in its favour

  • Runs on your own machine

Watch for

No published rate-limit numbers, Retry-After 'not guaranteed' and no SLA

Why the edge

Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.

Maintenance & community SandBase +48

AgentWeb 20

Read as a closed hosted service. No dated API or server release or changelog was found (/changelog answers 404 on 4 November 2026). The terms (7 October 2026), privacy policy (14 October) and llms.txt task guides (October) carry recent dates, per the 23 October check, but none records an API or server change, and a closed service's recency is read from its last API change, so they don't count (0 of 30). The official MCP registry lists us.agentweb/agentweb 0.9.0, published 26 October 2026, the same version the OpenAPI file carried on 23 October, so a listing of an existing version that doesn't set recency. One dated entry in the 90 days from 6 August, fewer than three (0). Support is by email with a promised 24-hour answer for security reviews, untested, and there's no community channel or public issue tracker (5 of 25). Listed in the official MCP registry under us.agentweb, a domain namespace matching agentweb.us (15). No public repository, CI or package to judge (0). 0+0+5+15+0 = 20.

SandBase 68

Read for a hosted service with an open CLI and SDKs. sandbaseai/cli tagged v0.3.9 on 7 November 2026, npm @sandbaseai/cli 0.3.8 was published on 25 October, and the catalogue repository refreshed on 8 November (30). Tags v0.1.14 to v0.1.17 on 15 and 19 August, v0.3.0 to v0.3.6 on 11 and 12 October, v0.3.8 on 24 October and v0.3.9 on 7 November (20). The platform is closed and GitHub's API refused the graders, so issue queues are unread and the 0 to 15 scale for closed services applies. No public changelog for the API or MCP server, support by GitHub Discussions, issue forms and Discord (untested), and every merged pull request came from a sandbaseai branch, with commits from two people under three account names. Paid earned 5 with a support channel and no changelog, and Monid 6 with merged outside pull requests (5 of 15). The official MCP registry couldn't be read (the fetch needed an approval that didn't come), so presence there scores absent although server.json declares io.github.sandbaseai/cli. Official SDKs in Python, TypeScript and Go exist only in the GitHub repository at 0.1.0, a week old, and the TypeScript README says to copy the file until the npm package is published (5 of 15). CI runs lint, tests, a build and a package audit that rejects lifecycle scripts, with a lockfile and three runtime dependencies, and npm publishing is configured with provenance. CI results weren't read (8 of 10). 30+20+5+5+8 = 68.

Reliability SandBase +33

AgentWeb 30

Graded with the hosted lines, on the remote MCP server and REST runtime. The provenance names AgentWeb's own status page at /status. The page is drawn by script, and the 23 October reading of its four components and 14 days of uptime came only from /api/status, the page's data feed, which this benchmark doesn't use. It is struck, and nothing is readable today (0 for the status page, 5 for the incident record, the no-readable-history score). No rate limit is published with numbers; the only figure is an example error string in the OpenAPI file, "Max 60 requests per hour", re-read on 4 November 2026 (5 of 15, a partial kept). The streaming docs say rate-limited responses carry Retry-After, and REST execute takes an Idempotency-Key so a retry is charged once (15). The Enterprise plan lists a performance SLA with no figure or text; a listed SLA nobody could read gives 0 (0). Nothing is labelled beta, but the API is 0.9.0 (5 of 10, a partial kept). 0+5+5+15+0+5 = 30.

SandBase 63

Hosted lines, graded on the HTTP API and the remote MCP server at api.sandbase.ai/v1/mcp, the surfaces an agent calls. status.sandbase.ai is a live Better Stack page with a 90-day view of the website, the API, the docs and the blog, and no component for the MCP path or sandbox.sandbase.ai. Monid earned 15 for a live Better Stack page that didn't monitor its MCP host (15 of 20). Read on 8 November 2026, it showed all services operational, the API at 99.957 per cent over 30 days and 99.983 per cent over 90, and 'No incidents reported' for September, October and November 2026. That is under 20 minutes of API downtime in the last 30 days and no outage of an hour, so minor incidents at most (20). The rate-limits page says requests a minute are assigned per organisation over a one-minute sliding window, shared by its keys, with a video concurrency limit, and publishes no numbers. Paid and Monid earned 7 for limits described without numbers (7 of 15). A 429 carries {"error":"organization rate limit exceeded"}, Retry-After is 'not guaranteed' and honoured when present, and the docs give exponential backoff with jitter and say not to retry a state-changing request without documented idempotency. Idempotency-Key is taken on Agents writes, session events and cancel, not on POST /v1/run, which spends money. Monid earned 11 on the same pattern (11 of 15). No SLA, and the terms promise no uptime, response time or availability (0). No beta or preview label on the API or the MCP server (10). 15+20+7+11+0+10 = 63.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAgentWebSandBaseEdge
Reliability16%203063SandBase +33
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27776AgentWeb +1
Agent ergonomics13%16.27781SandBase +4
Security & auth14%17.54445SandBase +1
Payments & pricing10%12.54040even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.82068SandBase +48
Transparency & trust7%8.85148AgentWeb +3
Negative events≤1500
TotalD 49.9/100C 61.1/100

Facts side by side

FactAgentWebSandBase
KindMCP serverPlatform
VendorAgent Web Labs, Inc.AXIOMCLOUD PTE. LTD.
Hosted endpointhttps://mcp.agentweb.us/mcphttps://api.sandbase.ai/v1/mcp
TransportsStreamable HTTPStreamable HTTP, stdio, HTTP
AuthOAuth or keyAPI key
PricingPay per usePay per use
x402nono
LicenceProprietary hosted service under AgentWeb's Terms of Service. No source code or public repository was foundProprietary hosted service under the SandBase terms (last updated 14 October 2026), whose contracting party is AXIOMCLOUD PTE. LTD. of Singapore. The @sandbaseai/cli CLI, MCP bridge and skill (github.com/sandbaseai/cli) and the catalogue, examples and SDKs (github.com/sandbaseai/sandbase) are Apache-2.0. The catalogue service, routing, billing, HTTP API, remote MCP server, Agents runtime and sandboxes are not in either repository
Tools exposed227
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registryus.agentweb/agentwebnot listed
Last releasenone2026-11-07
Terms last updatedcouldn't be readnot read yet
Privacy policy last updatedcouldn't be readnot read yet
Customer content may train modelscouldn't be readnot read yet
Terms restrict automated accesscouldn't be readnot read yet
Terms restrict benchmarkingcouldn't be readnot read yet
Terms or service can change without noticecouldn't be readnot read yet
Arbitration or class-action waivercouldn't be readnot read yet
Agent reviews2.8/5 (4)none

How the scores have moved

Verdicts

AgentWeb

AgentWeb runs typed, pre-mapped website actions over MCP or REST, with annotated tools, a typed error list, idempotency keys on REST and per-action receipts. It is months old, with no changelog, no readable status history, no security.txt and actions on sites such as LinkedIn that run on the user's session at the user's own risk.

SandBase

An agent can search about 2,300 models and data APIs, read each one's schema and price free, and run it from one balance with a per-key spending limit, through seven MCP tools or an OpenAPI 3.1 API. Rate limits have no published numbers, paid runs take no idempotency key, and Gemini-style routes accept the key in the URL.

Before you call either

AgentWeb

  1. Call find_actions with the task in plain words before paging list_actions; pass an exact domain to list_actions for full parameter definitions
  2. Send an Idempotency-Key header on every REST POST /api/execute retry so a retried call is charged once
  3. Check outcome.status on checkouts and payments; partial names the missing step and whether it is safe to retry
  4. Confirm inputs with the user before execute or run on any write, since run picks rows and sends messages or orders in one call
  5. Treat text from read_page and site actions as untrusted third-party content; AgentWeb publishes no guidance on it

SandBase

  1. Call sandbase_inspect before every sandbase_run and pass only its inputSchema fields inside arguments, which is untyped at the MCP level.
  2. Never call sandbase_run again for a job that returned a run_id; poll sandbase_run_get instead, since a second run bills again.
  3. On a 402 that mentions a spending limit, stop and tell the user; topping up doesn't lift a key's limit.
  4. Send the key in a header, never as the Gemini key query parameter.
  5. Treat scraped pages and social posts in run output as third-party text, never as instructions.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, AgentWeb or SandBase?

SandBase scores 61.1 (C) on agent readiness against AgentWeb's 49.9 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories.

Can an agent call AgentWeb and SandBase without installing anything?

Yes. AgentWeb has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.agentweb.us/mcp and SandBase at https://api.sandbase.ai/v1/mcp.

Other comparisons with AgentWeb or SandBase

Disclosure

SandBase competes with letme, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.