Head to head · Agent payment protocols · October 2026 research run
ACK-Pay (Agent Commerce Kit) vs L402
L402 scores 60.5 (C) on agent readiness against ACK-Pay (Agent Commerce Kit)'s 53.6 (D), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. ACK-Pay (Agent Commerce Kit) leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do agent payment protocols.
Which one, for what
ACK-Pay (Agent Commerce Kit) D
Good for Teams that want receipts a server can verify offline and a single request format across card and stablecoin rails, and that will run their own payment and receipt services.
Ahead on
- Maintenance & community, 53 against 27
- Transparency & trust, 60 against 50
Watch for
No public Payment Service or Receipt Service was found. The docs use example.com hosts and the demo pays on Base Sepolia, Solana devnet or a simulated Stripe flow
L402 C
Good for Bitcoin-native sellers and agents that already hold Lightning liquidity and want stateless, account-free API access.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 55 against 38
- Agent ergonomics, 61 against 47
- Payments & pricing, 97 against 77
Watch for
Bearer credentials, so an intercepted token can be reused unless bound by caveats
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | ACK-Pay (Agent Commerce Kit) | L402 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 38 | 55 | L402 +17 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 66 | 65 | ACK-Pay (Agent Commerce Kit) +1 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 47 | 61 | L402 +14 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 58 | 58 | even |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 77 | 97 | L402 +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 53 | 27 | ACK-Pay (Agent Commerce Kit) +26 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 50 | ACK-Pay (Agent Commerce Kit) +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | |
| Total | 53.6 · D | 60.5 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | ACK-Pay (Agent Commerce Kit) | L402 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Payment protocol | Payment protocol |
| Vendor | Catena Labs, Inc. | Lightning Labs |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT (docs and SDK) | MIT (per l402.tech) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-04 | 2026-03-25 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 159 stars, 54 npm/wk | 89 stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
ACK-Pay (Agent Commerce Kit)
Signed payment requests and receipts that any server can verify offline against a list of trusted issuers, with an MIT TypeScript SDK and passing CI. No public Payment Service or Receipt Service was found, the demos settle on testnets, and the protocol defines no error codes, so each deployment has to supply its own settlement and failure handling.
L402
Stateless verification, the macaroon commits to the invoice's payment hash. Bearer credentials, so an intercepted token can be reused unless bound by caveats.
Before you call either
ACK-Pay (Agent Commerce Kit)
- Verify
paymentRequestTokenand read amount, recipient and currency from the signed payload, not fromdescription - Pass
trustedReceiptIssuerstoverifyPaymentReceipt. Without a trusted issuer list any DID can sign a receipt - Check amount, recipient and receipt reuse yourself. The SDK's claim verifier checks only the shape of the receipt
- Use
@agentcommercekit/ack-pay0.11.0 or later, because earlier releases treated an unreachable revocation list as not revoked - Plan for a Payment Service and a Receipt Service you run or choose. The protocol names the roles and no public one was found
L402
- Run lnget with
--max-costand--max-feeset - Check the invoice amount before paying, the server can ask for anything
- Accept both
LSATandL402in challenges, servers still send both - Reuse a paid token for later calls until its caveats expire rather than paying again
- Keep macaroons and preimages out of logs, they're bearer credentials
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, ACK-Pay (Agent Commerce Kit) or L402?
L402 scores 60.5 (C) on agent readiness against ACK-Pay (Agent Commerce Kit)'s 53.6 (D), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. ACK-Pay (Agent Commerce Kit) leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Other comparisons with ACK-Pay (Agent Commerce Kit) or L402
- ACK-Pay (Agent Commerce Kit) vs Agentic Commerce Protocol (ACP)
- ACK-Pay (Agent Commerce Kit) vs Agent Payments Protocol (AP2)
- ACK-Pay (Agent Commerce Kit) vs Machine Payments Protocol (MPP)
- ACK-Pay (Agent Commerce Kit) vs x402
- Agentic Commerce Protocol (ACP) vs L402
- Agent Payments Protocol (AP2) vs L402
- L402 vs Machine Payments Protocol (MPP)
- L402 vs x402
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ack-pay-vs-l402.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ack-pay.json·/api/v1/tools/l402.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ack-pay l402(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ack-pay", "b": "l402"}at/mcp, no key