{
  "fixes": {
    "slug": "onesignal",
    "name": "OneSignal",
    "listing": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/onesignal",
    "markdown": "# Fix list: OneSignal\n\nFrom Anchor Terminal's listing at https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/onesignal, the October 2026 research run, assessed 1 October 2026. Grade B, 69.6 out of 100.\n\nThis is everything the published grade says the listing lacks, the biggest possible gain to the total first. It comes from the reason given for each score, the checklist each category was scored against (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist), the provenance checks, the deductions, what we couldn't check and what the review panel asked for. A fix counts at the next check, once it's public.\n\nFor a coding agent working on OneSignal: work through the items below in the product, its docs and its public pages. Each category gives the reason for its score, with the points each checklist item earned, and the checklist itself, so the gap is the items that earned less than their points. Change the product, not the wording, and keep a note of what you changed and where it's published.\n\n## 1. Payments \u0026 pricing, 35 out of 100, up to 8.1 more on the total\n\nWhy it scored 35: No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Per-unit prices are public, $0.012 per mobile push monthly active user, $0.004 per web push subscriber and $1.50 per 1,000 emails after 20,000 on Growth from $19 a month (20). A free plan with 1,000 monthly active users for mobile push and 10,000 emails a month, but the pricing page doesn't say whether a card is needed (15). A person signs up in the dashboard (0).\n\nThe checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-payments):\n\nThe published rubric, also on the [x402 page](https://www.anchorterminal.com/x402/).\n\n- 40, a machine payment protocol (x402, MPP or L402) on the tool's own endpoints. 10 to 30 when it covers only some endpoints or only goes through a third party, and the note says which.\n- 20, per-call or per-unit pricing published without a login. 10 for public plan-only pricing, 0 for \"contact sales\" or prices behind a login.\n- 20, a free tier or trial that doesn't need a card.\n- 20, autonomous onboarding, meaning an agent can get access without a person signing up in a browser (keyless use, x402, a programmatic key API).\n\nPayment platforms and agent wallets rarely charge for their own API over a machine protocol, so the first line has steps for them, and the highest one that applies counts. 40 when x402, MPP or L402 runs on all their own endpoints, 30 when it runs on part of their own API, 25 when their merchants can accept one, 20 for running a facilitator, 15 for paying as a buyer, and 0 when the only protocol is their own. Merchant acceptance sits above a facilitator because the platform's own customers can charge agents through it, while a facilitator settles for sellers who wire up the protocol themselves. The counter-argument (a facilitator does more for the protocol as a whole) has a point. Each note says which step applied.\n\nOpen-source software you run yourself is scored on its hosted or paid option if it has one. A free, self-hosted package with nothing to buy gets 20, 20 and 20 for the last three lines, and 0 to 40 for the first only if it ships a payment protocol.\n\n## 2. Reliability, 70 out of 100, up to 6 more on the total\n\nWhy it scored 70: Statuspage at status.onesignal.com (20). Ten entries since 6 July 2026. Three touched the API and SDK endpoints in September, intermittent errors on the create-notification endpoint on 18 September, subscription creation failures on 22 September and a database incident for apps whose IDs start with e on 30 September, and Apple push failed for about 3% of sends on 4 August. The feed gives no durations, so we score this as more than one major (10). Limits published per endpoint, create message 150 a second per app on Free and 6,000 on paid plans, user updates 1,000 a second per app and 1 a second per user (15). 429 returns Retry-After, and the docs give two backoff recipes and tell you to reuse the same `idempotency_key` on every retry (15). The pricing page marks an SLA as available on Enterprise without publishing terms (5). The REST API is generally available, but the MCP server is in open beta (5).\n\nThe checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-reliability):\n\nHosted APIs, MCP servers, models and platforms.\n\n- 20, a public status page with component history (Statuspage, Instatus, BetterStack or the vendor's own).\n- 0 to 30, the incident record for the last 90 days on that page. 30 for a clean record or trivial incidents only, 20 for minor incidents only, 10 for one major outage (an hour or more of a core API down, or errors across the board), 0 for several. 5 when there's no history we could read, and the note says so.\n- 15, rate limits documented with numbers.\n- 15, documented 429 or overload handling (Retry-After, backoff guidance), and idempotency keys or safe-retry guidance where writes are involved.\n- 10, an SLA published for any paid tier.\n- 10, the surface agents use is generally available, not beta or preview.\n\nLocal packages, SDKs, frameworks and stdio MCP servers.\n\n- 20, installs from an official package with supported runtimes stated.\n- 25, a public CI and test suite, passing on the default branch.\n- 0 to 25, open crash or regression issues relative to activity (25 for few and handled, 0 for many, old and unanswered).\n- 15, semver discipline and breaking changes called out in a changelog.\n- 15, version 1.0 or later, or declared stable.\n\nProtocols are read from their reference implementations, the public facilitators or servers, spec stability and test vectors.\n\n## 3. Agent ergonomics, 64 out of 100, up to 5.9 more on the total\n\nWhy it scored 64: 43 MCP tools in 11 categories, with no toolsets or dynamic loading found (5). View endpoints take limit and offset (2). Targeting by segment, alias and filters, offset paging on views (15). Errors come back as an `errors` array of messages, with the rate-limit case documented (12). `idempotency_key` on message creation dedupes for 30 days, `send_message` is flagged high-impact so clients can ask first, and the MCP server lists no delete tools (18). Every call needs `app_id` in the body and an alias or segment to target, though SDKs cover Node, Python and other languages (12).\n\nThe checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-ergonomics):\n\n- 0 to 25, context cost. For MCP, the number and size of the tool definitions (25 for ten or fewer compact tools, 15 for 11 to 30, 5 for more than 30, plus up to 10 back for toolsets, dynamic loading or read-only subsets). For APIs, whether responses can be sized (field selection, limits, summaries).\n- 20, pagination, filtering and output-size controls.\n- 20, actionable, documented error responses, codes and messages an agent can recover from.\n- 20, idempotency or safe retries, and for MCP the `readOnlyHint` and `destructiveHint` annotations.\n- 15, sensible defaults, few required parameters, and official SDKs in at least two languages.\n\nModels are read for tool use, structured output, prompt caching, context length, batch and SDKs. Frameworks for how much code and how many defaults a tool-calling agent with MCP needs.\n\n## 4. Security \u0026 auth, 74 out of 100, up to 4.6 more on the total\n\nWhy it scored 74: The MCP server is OAuth only and acts with the signed-in user's account permissions, and the REST API takes an app key as `Authorization: Key` (25). No delete tools in the MCP server, `send_message` marked for confirmation, and permissions follow the user's role (14). Tools return user profiles, subscriptions and message content with no prompt-injection guidance found (5). Audit logs kept 48 hours on Free and Growth and 90 days on Enterprise, per the pricing page (12). Valid security.txt per the 30 September check, and the trust page lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and 27701, HIPAA, GDPR and CCPA, with a trust centre on Conveyor (18).\n\nThe checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-security):\n\n- 0 to 30, the credential model. 30 for OAuth 2.1 with scopes, or scoped and revocable keys with rotation. 20 for plain revocable API keys. 10 for one all-powerful key. 10 off when a secret can travel in a URL query string as a documented option.\n- 0 to 20, read-only or least-privilege modes, and confirmation or approval for destructive actions.\n- 0 to 15, prompt-injection posture where the tool returns untrusted content (documented mitigations or guidance). A tool that returns no untrusted content gets 10.\n- 0 to 15, audit logs or per-call visibility for the operator.\n- 0 to 20, a security programme. security.txt or a disclosure policy, a bug bounty, SOC 2 or ISO 27001, advisories handled in public.\n\nModels are read for retention, whether API data trains models (and whether that's off by default), zero-retention options and certifications. Frameworks for telemetry defaults, approval hooks, guardrails and sandboxing.\n\n## 5. Schema \u0026 documentation, 87 out of 100, up to 2.1 more on the total\n\nWhy it scored 87: Public OpenAPI file at documentation.onesignal.com/openapi.json, per the 30 September check (25). llms.txt and Markdown docs (10). The MCP docs group 43 tools into 11 categories with counts, and the API reference explains targeting and channels, but we couldn't read the MCP tool definitions themselves (14). Typed request bodies from the OpenAPI file, with localised `contents` and `headings` objects and many optional targeting fields (12). Examples on reference pages and the 429 body is documented, with less on other error shapes (11). A dated changelog with deprecation notices, the latest on 30 September 2026 (15).\n\nThe checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-schema):\n\nAPIs and MCP servers.\n\n- 25, a machine-readable contract (a public OpenAPI file or similar; for MCP, typed JSON Schema inputs on every tool).\n- 10, llms.txt or Markdown docs served for agents.\n- 0 to 20, descriptions that say what a tool is for, when to use it and when not to, read from the tool definitions in the source or the API reference.\n- 0 to 15, typed inputs with enums, constraints and required fields, and no free-form JSON blobs.\n- 0 to 15, examples and documented error responses.\n- 15, versioning and a public changelog.\n\nModels are read from the API reference, the OpenAPI file, llms.txt, the structured-output and tool-use docs and the model cards. Frameworks from docs a model can follow, typed interfaces, examples and the API reference.\n\n## 6. Transparency \u0026 trust, 76 out of 100, up to 2.1 more on the total\n\nMade of editorial 51, provenance 100.\n\nWhy it scored 76: Closed service with published terms. The Node SDK's modified MIT licence limits use to OneSignal's services (15). The pricing page gives retention per plan (audit logs 48 hours to 90 days, inactive free subscriptions kept 18 months), and the trust page lists ISO 27701. We didn't read the full privacy policy (15). Dated deprecation notices, for example five subscription fields announced on 17 March 2026 and removed on 15 April (15). Subprocessors sit behind the Conveyor trust centre, and we found no data locations (6).\n\nThe checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-transparency):\n\n- 0 to 30, source availability and licence clarity. 30 for open source under an OSI licence, 15 for closed with clear terms, 0 for unclear terms.\n- 0 to 30, data handling and retention statements that agree with each other (privacy policy, DPA, retention periods, subprocessors).\n- 0 to 20, a deprecation policy or notices with dates.\n- 0 to 20, telemetry disclosed with an opt-out (local software), or subprocessors and data locations disclosed (hosted).\n\nThe other half of Transparency and trust is the provenance score, computed from checked facts (below). The category score is the mean of the two.\n\n## 7. Maintenance \u0026 community, 81 out of 100, up to 1.7 more on the total\n\nWhy it scored 81: Changelog entry on 30 September 2026 (30). Eight dated changelog entries between 21 August and 30 September (20). A closed service with a weekly changelog. We didn't test support response (11). Current official SDKs, with the Node SDK at v5.18.0 on 9 September (15). The Node SDK's workflows are CodeQL, project automation and a release build, with no test job (5).\n\nThe checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-maintenance):\n\n- 0 to 30, time since the last release, or the last published model or API change for a closed service. 30 within 30 days, 20 within 90, 10 within 180, 0 older.\n- 20, at least three releases or dated changelog entries in the last 90 days.\n- 0 to 25, responsiveness. Issues and pull requests answered on GitHub (the open issues and how recent the replies are). For closed services, a public changelog and a support or community channel that answers, 0 to 15.\n- 15, presence in the official MCP registry under a verified namespace (MCP servers), or current official SDKs (APIs and models).\n- 10, package health, current dependencies and CI.\n\nModels are read for deprecation notice periods and model churn rather than release counts.\n\n## What we couldn't check\n\nWhat we couldn't read counted as absent. Publishing it on a page a plain HTTP fetch can read (not only in a browser) lets the next check count it.\n\n- How long the 18, 22 and 30 September 2026 API incidents lasted, which the status feed doesn't say\n- Whether the free plan needs a card at signup\n- unchecked: the full privacy policy, DPA and subprocessor list, which sit behind the Conveyor trust centre\n\n## Weaknesses\n\n- Three incidents on the API and SDK endpoints in September 2026\n- MCP server is in open beta and app access may need enabling before most tools work\n- Priced per monthly active user and subscriber, which is hard to forecast\n- 43 MCP tools with no way to load a subset\n- The SDK licence limits use to OneSignal's services, and the Node SDK has no test job in CI\n\n## What costs an agent a turn today\n\nThe notes we give agents before they call it. Each one is a workaround an agent shouldn't need.\n\n- Use `Authorization: Key \u003ckey\u003e`, not Bearer, and put `app_id` in the body\n- Send an `idempotency_key` UUID with every create call and reuse it on each retry\n- On 429, wait for `Retry-After`, then back off with jitter, up to 10 attempts\n- Stay under 10 sends per subscribed subscription in 15 minutes or the app is disabled\n- Target people with `include_aliases.external_id` and set `target_channel`\n\n## What the review panel asked for\n\n- State if signup needs a card\n- Lift the MCP app-access gate\n- longer notice on removals\n\n## When it's done\n\nSend what changed and where it's published as a dispute (https://www.anchorterminal.com/builders/#disputes, or `POST https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/contact` with `\"kind\": \"dispute\"`). Disputes are answered in public, and the listing is checked again by the same checklist. Paying for an audit or a listing claim changes nothing here.\n",
    "grade": "B",
    "score": 69.6,
    "assessed": "2026-10-01",
    "run": "October 2026 research run",
    "categories": [
      {
        "key": "payments",
        "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing",
        "score": 35,
        "maxGain": 8.1,
        "reason": "No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Per-unit prices are public, $0.012 per mobile push monthly active user, $0.004 per web push subscriber and $1.50 per 1,000 emails after 20,000 on Growth from $19 a month (20). A free plan with 1,000 monthly active users for mobile push and 10,000 emails a month, but the pricing page doesn't say whether a card is needed (15). A person signs up in the dashboard (0).",
        "checklist": [
          "The published rubric, also on the [x402 page](https://www.anchorterminal.com/x402/).",
          "- 40, a machine payment protocol (x402, MPP or L402) on the tool's own endpoints. 10 to 30 when it covers only some endpoints or only goes through a third party, and the note says which.\n- 20, per-call or per-unit pricing published without a login. 10 for public plan-only pricing, 0 for \"contact sales\" or prices behind a login.\n- 20, a free tier or trial that doesn't need a card.\n- 20, autonomous onboarding, meaning an agent can get access without a person signing up in a browser (keyless use, x402, a programmatic key API).",
          "Payment platforms and agent wallets rarely charge for their own API over a machine protocol, so the first line has steps for them, and the highest one that applies counts. 40 when x402, MPP or L402 runs on all their own endpoints, 30 when it runs on part of their own API, 25 when their merchants can accept one, 20 for running a facilitator, 15 for paying as a buyer, and 0 when the only protocol is their own. Merchant acceptance sits above a facilitator because the platform's own customers can charge agents through it, while a facilitator settles for sellers who wire up the protocol themselves. The counter-argument (a facilitator does more for the protocol as a whole) has a point. Each note says which step applied.",
          "Open-source software you run yourself is scored on its hosted or paid option if it has one. A free, self-hosted package with nothing to buy gets 20, 20 and 20 for the last three lines, and 0 to 40 for the first only if it ships a payment protocol."
        ],
        "checklistUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-payments"
      },
      {
        "key": "reliability",
        "name": "Reliability",
        "score": 70,
        "maxGain": 6,
        "reason": "Statuspage at status.onesignal.com (20). Ten entries since 6 July 2026. Three touched the API and SDK endpoints in September, intermittent errors on the create-notification endpoint on 18 September, subscription creation failures on 22 September and a database incident for apps whose IDs start with e on 30 September, and Apple push failed for about 3% of sends on 4 August. The feed gives no durations, so we score this as more than one major (10). Limits published per endpoint, create message 150 a second per app on Free and 6,000 on paid plans, user updates 1,000 a second per app and 1 a second per user (15). 429 returns Retry-After, and the docs give two backoff recipes and tell you to reuse the same `idempotency_key` on every retry (15). The pricing page marks an SLA as available on Enterprise without publishing terms (5). The REST API is generally available, but the MCP server is in open beta (5).",
        "checklist": [
          "Hosted APIs, MCP servers, models and platforms.",
          "- 20, a public status page with component history (Statuspage, Instatus, BetterStack or the vendor's own).\n- 0 to 30, the incident record for the last 90 days on that page. 30 for a clean record or trivial incidents only, 20 for minor incidents only, 10 for one major outage (an hour or more of a core API down, or errors across the board), 0 for several. 5 when there's no history we could read, and the note says so.\n- 15, rate limits documented with numbers.\n- 15, documented 429 or overload handling (Retry-After, backoff guidance), and idempotency keys or safe-retry guidance where writes are involved.\n- 10, an SLA published for any paid tier.\n- 10, the surface agents use is generally available, not beta or preview.",
          "Local packages, SDKs, frameworks and stdio MCP servers.",
          "- 20, installs from an official package with supported runtimes stated.\n- 25, a public CI and test suite, passing on the default branch.\n- 0 to 25, open crash or regression issues relative to activity (25 for few and handled, 0 for many, old and unanswered).\n- 15, semver discipline and breaking changes called out in a changelog.\n- 15, version 1.0 or later, or declared stable.",
          "Protocols are read from their reference implementations, the public facilitators or servers, spec stability and test vectors."
        ],
        "checklistUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-reliability"
      },
      {
        "key": "ergonomics",
        "name": "Agent ergonomics",
        "score": 64,
        "maxGain": 5.9,
        "reason": "43 MCP tools in 11 categories, with no toolsets or dynamic loading found (5). View endpoints take limit and offset (2). Targeting by segment, alias and filters, offset paging on views (15). Errors come back as an `errors` array of messages, with the rate-limit case documented (12). `idempotency_key` on message creation dedupes for 30 days, `send_message` is flagged high-impact so clients can ask first, and the MCP server lists no delete tools (18). Every call needs `app_id` in the body and an alias or segment to target, though SDKs cover Node, Python and other languages (12).",
        "checklist": [
          "- 0 to 25, context cost. For MCP, the number and size of the tool definitions (25 for ten or fewer compact tools, 15 for 11 to 30, 5 for more than 30, plus up to 10 back for toolsets, dynamic loading or read-only subsets). For APIs, whether responses can be sized (field selection, limits, summaries).\n- 20, pagination, filtering and output-size controls.\n- 20, actionable, documented error responses, codes and messages an agent can recover from.\n- 20, idempotency or safe retries, and for MCP the `readOnlyHint` and `destructiveHint` annotations.\n- 15, sensible defaults, few required parameters, and official SDKs in at least two languages.",
          "Models are read for tool use, structured output, prompt caching, context length, batch and SDKs. Frameworks for how much code and how many defaults a tool-calling agent with MCP needs."
        ],
        "checklistUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-ergonomics"
      },
      {
        "key": "security",
        "name": "Security \u0026 auth",
        "score": 74,
        "maxGain": 4.6,
        "reason": "The MCP server is OAuth only and acts with the signed-in user's account permissions, and the REST API takes an app key as `Authorization: Key` (25). No delete tools in the MCP server, `send_message` marked for confirmation, and permissions follow the user's role (14). Tools return user profiles, subscriptions and message content with no prompt-injection guidance found (5). Audit logs kept 48 hours on Free and Growth and 90 days on Enterprise, per the pricing page (12). Valid security.txt per the 30 September check, and the trust page lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and 27701, HIPAA, GDPR and CCPA, with a trust centre on Conveyor (18).",
        "checklist": [
          "- 0 to 30, the credential model. 30 for OAuth 2.1 with scopes, or scoped and revocable keys with rotation. 20 for plain revocable API keys. 10 for one all-powerful key. 10 off when a secret can travel in a URL query string as a documented option.\n- 0 to 20, read-only or least-privilege modes, and confirmation or approval for destructive actions.\n- 0 to 15, prompt-injection posture where the tool returns untrusted content (documented mitigations or guidance). A tool that returns no untrusted content gets 10.\n- 0 to 15, audit logs or per-call visibility for the operator.\n- 0 to 20, a security programme. security.txt or a disclosure policy, a bug bounty, SOC 2 or ISO 27001, advisories handled in public.",
          "Models are read for retention, whether API data trains models (and whether that's off by default), zero-retention options and certifications. Frameworks for telemetry defaults, approval hooks, guardrails and sandboxing."
        ],
        "checklistUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-security"
      },
      {
        "key": "schema",
        "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation",
        "score": 87,
        "maxGain": 2.1,
        "reason": "Public OpenAPI file at documentation.onesignal.com/openapi.json, per the 30 September check (25). llms.txt and Markdown docs (10). The MCP docs group 43 tools into 11 categories with counts, and the API reference explains targeting and channels, but we couldn't read the MCP tool definitions themselves (14). Typed request bodies from the OpenAPI file, with localised `contents` and `headings` objects and many optional targeting fields (12). Examples on reference pages and the 429 body is documented, with less on other error shapes (11). A dated changelog with deprecation notices, the latest on 30 September 2026 (15).",
        "checklist": [
          "APIs and MCP servers.",
          "- 25, a machine-readable contract (a public OpenAPI file or similar; for MCP, typed JSON Schema inputs on every tool).\n- 10, llms.txt or Markdown docs served for agents.\n- 0 to 20, descriptions that say what a tool is for, when to use it and when not to, read from the tool definitions in the source or the API reference.\n- 0 to 15, typed inputs with enums, constraints and required fields, and no free-form JSON blobs.\n- 0 to 15, examples and documented error responses.\n- 15, versioning and a public changelog.",
          "Models are read from the API reference, the OpenAPI file, llms.txt, the structured-output and tool-use docs and the model cards. Frameworks from docs a model can follow, typed interfaces, examples and the API reference."
        ],
        "checklistUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-schema"
      },
      {
        "key": "transparency",
        "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust",
        "score": 76,
        "maxGain": 2.1,
        "reason": "Closed service with published terms. The Node SDK's modified MIT licence limits use to OneSignal's services (15). The pricing page gives retention per plan (audit logs 48 hours to 90 days, inactive free subscriptions kept 18 months), and the trust page lists ISO 27701. We didn't read the full privacy policy (15). Dated deprecation notices, for example five subscription fields announced on 17 March 2026 and removed on 15 April (15). Subprocessors sit behind the Conveyor trust centre, and we found no data locations (6).",
        "blend": "editorial 51, provenance 100",
        "checklist": [
          "- 0 to 30, source availability and licence clarity. 30 for open source under an OSI licence, 15 for closed with clear terms, 0 for unclear terms.\n- 0 to 30, data handling and retention statements that agree with each other (privacy policy, DPA, retention periods, subprocessors).\n- 0 to 20, a deprecation policy or notices with dates.\n- 0 to 20, telemetry disclosed with an opt-out (local software), or subprocessors and data locations disclosed (hosted).",
          "The other half of Transparency and trust is the provenance score, computed from checked facts (below). The category score is the mean of the two."
        ],
        "checklistUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-transparency"
      },
      {
        "key": "maintenance",
        "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community",
        "score": 81,
        "maxGain": 1.7,
        "reason": "Changelog entry on 30 September 2026 (30). Eight dated changelog entries between 21 August and 30 September (20). A closed service with a weekly changelog. We didn't test support response (11). Current official SDKs, with the Node SDK at v5.18.0 on 9 September (15). The Node SDK's workflows are CodeQL, project automation and a release build, with no test job (5).",
        "checklist": [
          "- 0 to 30, time since the last release, or the last published model or API change for a closed service. 30 within 30 days, 20 within 90, 10 within 180, 0 older.\n- 20, at least three releases or dated changelog entries in the last 90 days.\n- 0 to 25, responsiveness. Issues and pull requests answered on GitHub (the open issues and how recent the replies are). For closed services, a public changelog and a support or community channel that answers, 0 to 15.\n- 15, presence in the official MCP registry under a verified namespace (MCP servers), or current official SDKs (APIs and models).\n- 10, package health, current dependencies and CI.",
          "Models are read for deprecation notice periods and model churn rather than release counts."
        ],
        "checklistUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-maintenance"
      }
    ],
    "unchecked": [
      "How long the 18, 22 and 30 September 2026 API incidents lasted, which the status feed doesn't say",
      "Whether the free plan needs a card at signup",
      "unchecked: the full privacy policy, DPA and subprocessor list, which sit behind the Conveyor trust centre"
    ],
    "weaknesses": [
      "Three incidents on the API and SDK endpoints in September 2026",
      "MCP server is in open beta and app access may need enabling before most tools work",
      "Priced per monthly active user and subscriber, which is hard to forecast",
      "43 MCP tools with no way to load a subset",
      "The SDK licence limits use to OneSignal's services, and the Node SDK has no test job in CI"
    ],
    "agentNotes": [
      "Use `Authorization: Key \u003ckey\u003e`, not Bearer, and put `app_id` in the body",
      "Send an `idempotency_key` UUID with every create call and reuse it on each retry",
      "On 429, wait for `Retry-After`, then back off with jitter, up to 10 attempts",
      "Stay under 10 sends per subscribed subscription in 15 minutes or the app is disabled",
      "Target people with `include_aliases.external_id` and set `target_channel`"
    ],
    "requests": [
      {
        "text": "State if signup needs a card",
        "reviews": 1
      },
      {
        "text": "Lift the MCP app-access gate",
        "reviews": 1
      },
      {
        "text": "longer notice on removals",
        "reviews": 1
      }
    ],
    "recheck": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/builders/#disputes"
  },
  "meta": {
    "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)",
    "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/",
    "generatedAt": "2026-10-04",
    "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
    "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/",
    "methodology": "0.3",
    "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json",
    "preview": false,
    "run": "2026-10-01",
    "runLabel": "October 2026 research run"
  }
}