# Fix list: Heap From Anchor Terminal's listing at https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/heap, the October 2026 research run, assessed 7 October 2026. Grade D, 53 out of 100. This is everything the published grade says the listing lacks, the biggest possible gain to the total first. It comes from the reason given for each score, the checklist each category was scored against (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist), the provenance checks, the deductions, what we couldn't check and what the review panel asked for. A fix counts at the next check, once it's public. For a coding agent working on Heap: work through the items below in the product, its docs and its public pages. Each category gives the reason for its score, with the points each checklist item earned, and the checklist itself, so the gap is the items that earned less than their points. Change the product, not the wording, and keep a note of what you changed and where it's published. ## 1. Security & auth, 41 out of 100, up to 10.3 more on the total Why it scored 41: Track, identify and property calls carry no secret. The OpenAPI fragment declares an empty security requirement and the only identifier is the environment ID that the web snippet publishes. User deletion uses one admin-generated API key per account, exchanged for a temporary token. No scopes or rotation guidance found (8 of 30). Ingest is write-only by design. Deletion of up to 10,000 users has no confirmation step (5). The API returns no untrusted content (10). Audit logs are unchecked because help.heap.io answered with a bot check, so none are counted (0). Contentsquare publishes a signed security.txt valid to 31 January 2028 on contentsquare.com (not on heap.io), a disclosure policy, an invitation-only YesWeHack bounty, SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 (18). Total 41. The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-security): - 0 to 30, the credential model. 30 for OAuth 2.1 with scopes, or scoped and revocable keys with rotation. 20 for plain revocable API keys. 10 for one all-powerful key. 10 off when a secret can travel in a URL query string as a documented option. - 0 to 20, read-only or least-privilege modes, and confirmation or approval for destructive actions. - 0 to 15, prompt-injection posture where the tool returns untrusted content (documented mitigations or guidance). A tool that returns no untrusted content gets 10. - 0 to 15, audit logs or per-call visibility for the operator. - 0 to 20, a security programme. security.txt or a disclosure policy, a bug bounty, SOC 2 or ISO 27001, advisories handled in public. Models are read for retention, whether API data trains models (and whether that's off by default), zero-retention options and certifications. Frameworks for telemetry defaults, approval hooks, guardrails and sandboxing. ## 2. Payments & pricing, 25 out of 100, up to 9.4 more on the total Why it scored 25: No x402, MPP or L402 (0). The Free plan and its 10,000-session limit are public. Growth needs an estimate after signup and Pro and Premier say Contact Us, so no paid price is published (5). Free plan with APIs included. No card is mentioned on the pricing page, and the signup form needs JavaScript we couldn't run (20). A person signs up in a browser and copies the environment ID (0). Total 25. The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-payments): The published rubric, also on the [x402 page](https://www.anchorterminal.com/x402/). - 40, a machine payment protocol (x402, MPP or L402) on the tool's own endpoints. 10 to 30 when it covers only some endpoints or only goes through a third party, and the note says which. - 20, per-call or per-unit pricing published without a login. 10 for public plan-only pricing, 0 for "contact sales" or prices behind a login. - 20, a free tier or trial that doesn't need a card. - 20, autonomous onboarding, meaning an agent can get access without a person signing up in a browser (keyless use, x402, a programmatic key API). Payment platforms and agent wallets rarely charge for their own API over a machine protocol, so the first line has steps for them, and the highest one that applies counts. 40 when x402, MPP or L402 runs on all their own endpoints, 30 when it runs on part of their own API, 25 when their merchants can accept one, 20 for running a facilitator, 15 for paying as a buyer, and 0 when the only protocol is their own. Merchant acceptance sits above a facilitator because the platform's own customers can charge agents through it, while a facilitator settles for sellers who wire up the protocol themselves. The counter-argument (a facilitator does more for the protocol as a whole) has a point. Each note says which step applied. Open-source software you run yourself is scored on its hosted or paid option if it has one. A free, self-hosted package with nothing to buy gets 20, 20 and 20 for the last three lines, and 0 to 40 for the first only if it ships a payment protocol. ## 3. Agent ergonomics, 49 out of 100, up to 8.3 more on the total Why it scored 49: Responses are an empty object, so context cost is small, but there is nothing to read back (15). No pagination or filtering because the reference has no read endpoint. Bulk calls take 1,000 events or users (5). Errors on track and identify are a bare 400. User deletion returns `err.message` with 401 and 404 explained (6). `idempotency_key` on track and bulk track, and property writes overwrite, so retries are safe (15). Track needs three fields and timestamps default to now. No current official server SDK was found. heap-api on npm is 1.0.1 from 2016 (8). Total 49. The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-ergonomics): - 0 to 25, context cost. For MCP, the number and size of the tool definitions (25 for ten or fewer compact tools, 15 for 11 to 30, 5 for more than 30, plus up to 10 back for toolsets, dynamic loading or read-only subsets). For APIs, whether responses can be sized (field selection, limits, summaries). - 20, pagination, filtering and output-size controls. - 20, actionable, documented error responses, codes and messages an agent can recover from. - 20, idempotency or safe retries, and for MCP the `readOnlyHint` and `destructiveHint` annotations. - 15, sensible defaults, few required parameters, and official SDKs in at least two languages. Models are read for tool use, structured output, prompt caching, context length, batch and SDKs. Frameworks for how much code and how many defaults a tool-calling agent with MCP needs. ## 4. Schema & documentation, 57 out of 100, up to 7 more on the total Why it scored 57: OpenAPI 3.1 fragments are embedded in the Markdown of the track and identify pages. No single spec file was found, the property pages we read had empty fragments and user deletion is prose only (15). llms.txt and a .md copy of every page (10). Descriptions state purpose, limits and reserved keys, with little on when not to use a call (12). Required fields are marked and lengths stated in prose, with string types throughout, no enums and a free-form `properties` object (8). Curl examples on every page. Track and identify document 200 and 400 with an empty object, and only user deletion describes its error body (7). SDK changelogs are dated, but no changelog or version policy for the server-side API was found. Paths mix unversioned, v1 and v0 (5). Total 57. The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-schema): APIs and MCP servers. - 25, a machine-readable contract (a public OpenAPI file or similar; for MCP, typed JSON Schema inputs on every tool). - 10, llms.txt or Markdown docs served for agents. - 0 to 20, descriptions that say what a tool is for, when to use it and when not to, read from the tool definitions in the source or the API reference. - 0 to 15, typed inputs with enums, constraints and required fields, and no free-form JSON blobs. - 0 to 15, examples and documented error responses. - 15, versioning and a public changelog. Models are read from the API reference, the OpenAPI file, llms.txt, the structured-output and tool-use docs and the model cards. Frameworks from docs a model can follow, typed interfaces, examples and the API reference. ## 5. Reliability, 72 out of 100, up to 5.6 more on the total Why it scored 72: Graded on the server-side API with the hosted lines. Statuspage site at status.heap.io with component history (20). 15 incidents between 9 July and 7 October 2026, three marked major. Dashboards and charts failed to load from 12 to 13 July, US Connect ingestion was delayed on 20 July, and a Salesforce sync incident opened on 2 October was still open. Only one, a data latency notice on 27 July, names Data Collection, the component the API writes to (10). Rate limits published with numbers, 30 requests per 30 seconds per identity on track and 15,000 events a minute per environment on bulk track (15). No 429 or backoff guidance found, but track takes an `idempotency_key` (7). Contentsquare's support package states 99.5 per cent availability for Product Analytics Pro and Enterprise, measured on the user interface (10). The API carries no beta label (10). Total 72. The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-reliability): Hosted APIs, MCP servers, models and platforms. - 20, a public status page with component history (Statuspage, Instatus, BetterStack or the vendor's own). - 0 to 30, the incident record for the last 90 days on that page. 30 for a clean record or trivial incidents only, 20 for minor incidents only, 10 for one major outage (an hour or more of a core API down, or errors across the board), 0 for several. 5 when there's no history we could read, and the note says so. - 15, rate limits documented with numbers. - 15, documented 429 or overload handling (Retry-After, backoff guidance), and idempotency keys or safe-retry guidance where writes are involved. - 10, an SLA published for any paid tier. - 10, the surface agents use is generally available, not beta or preview. Local packages, SDKs, frameworks and stdio MCP servers. - 20, installs from an official package with supported runtimes stated. - 25, a public CI and test suite, passing on the default branch. - 0 to 25, open crash or regression issues relative to activity (25 for few and handled, 0 for many, old and unanswered). - 15, semver discipline and breaking changes called out in a changelog. - 15, version 1.0 or later, or declared stable. Protocols are read from their reference implementations, the public facilitators or servers, spec stability and test vectors. ## 6. Maintenance & community, 63 out of 100, up to 3.2 more on the total Why it scored 63: heap.js 5.3.17 shipped on 6 October 2026, but that is the browser SDK. The server-side track reference last changed on 3 June 2026 and has no changelog, so we scored this line between the two (20 of 30). heap.js 5.3.15, 5.3.16 and 5.3.17 and Android Core 0.9.5 fall inside 90 days (20). Dated public changelogs and a community at community.contentsquare.com, whose response times we didn't check (8). Client SDKs for web, Android, iOS, React Native and Flutter are current. The Node server client is from 2016 (10). CI not checked (5). Total 63. The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-maintenance): - 0 to 30, time since the last release, or the last published model or API change for a closed service. 30 within 30 days, 20 within 90, 10 within 180, 0 older. - 20, at least three releases or dated changelog entries in the last 90 days. - 0 to 25, responsiveness. Issues and pull requests answered on GitHub (the open issues and how recent the replies are). For closed services, a public changelog and a support or community channel that answers, 0 to 15. - 15, presence in the official MCP registry under a verified namespace (MCP servers), or current official SDKs (APIs and models). - 10, package health, current dependencies and CI. Models are read for deprecation notice periods and model churn rather than release counts. ## 7. Transparency & trust, 64 out of 100, up to 3.2 more on the total Made of editorial 61, provenance 66. Why it scored 64: Closed service with published terms, now Contentsquare's master services agreement (15). The DPA (June 2026) caps Product Analytics retention at 37 months from collection unless agreed otherwise and links the sub-processor list. heap.io still carries a 2019 website terms page from Heap Inc. beside the Contentsquare documents (22). No deprecation policy for the API was found. Contentsquare's docs carry migration guides from the Heap SDKs to the CSQ SDK without an end date that we found (4). Sub-processor list (June 2026) with locations, AWS in Ireland, Frankfurt and Virginia and OpenAI for Sense Chat (20). Total 61. The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-transparency): - 0 to 30, source availability and licence clarity. 30 for open source under an OSI licence, 15 for closed with clear terms, 0 for unclear terms. - 0 to 30, data handling and retention statements that agree with each other (privacy policy, DPA, retention periods, subprocessors). - 0 to 20, a deprecation policy or notices with dates. - 0 to 20, telemetry disclosed with an opt-out (local software), or subprocessors and data locations disclosed (hosted). The other half of Transparency and trust is the provenance score, computed from checked facts (below). The category score is the mean of the two. Provenance checks not met in full (half of this category, computed from checked facts): - Domain age: heap.io, no registry record we could read (0 of 15) - Terms of service: read, states 5 of the 7 things a reader expects, and has 2 clauses that cost points (4.3 of 10) - Privacy policy: published, but our reader couldn't read it (7 of 10) - security.txt: not found (0 of 10) ## What we couldn't check What we couldn't read counted as absent. Publishing it on a page a plain HTTP fetch can read (not only in a browser) lets the next check count it. - unchecked: the Heap MCP server. A help centre article titled Heap MCP overview exists at help.heap.io, which answered our reader with a Cloudflare bot check. Its URL, tools, auth, limits and plan availability are unread, so the MCP server is not graded and `analytics.query` is not listed. - unchecked: everything else on help.heap.io, including audit logs, roles and permissions, SSO detail, Heap Connect setup and any export or query API documented only there. - unchecked: whether free signup asks for a card. The signup page at heapanalytics.com/signup renders with JavaScript only. - unchecked: the registration date of heap.io. No RDAP service answered for .io. - No changelog, version policy or deprecation policy for the server-side API was found in the developer docs. - No 429 response or backoff guidance was found for the server-side API. ## Weaknesses - No query, export or definitions endpoint in the developer reference. Reading results needs the app, Heap Connect or the MCP server we couldn't read - Track, identify and property calls carry no secret. The only identifier is the environment ID that the web snippet also publishes - Three incidents marked major on status.heap.io in the 90 days to 7 October 2026, one of them still open - Paid plans have no public price. Growth asks for an estimate after signup, and Pro and Premier say Contact Us - Error responses for track and identify are documented as a 400 with an empty object, and no 429 guidance was found ## What costs an agent a turn today The notes we give agents before they call it. Each one is a workaround an agent shouldn't need. - Send EU projects to https://c.eu.heap-api.com instead of https://heapanalytics.com. The path stays the same - Pass one of `identity` or `user_id` on track, never both - Set `idempotency_key` on every track event so a retry doesn't duplicate it - Stay under 30 requests per 30 seconds per identity, or batch up to 1,000 events in one bulk call - For deletion, exchange the app_id and API key of the Main Production environment for a token first. Any other environment ID returns Unauthorized ## When it's done Send what changed and where it's published as a dispute (https://www.anchorterminal.com/builders/#disputes, or `POST https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/contact` with `"kind": "dispute"`). Disputes are answered in public, and the listing is checked again by the same checklist. Paying for an audit or a listing claim changes nothing here.