{
  "fixes": {
    "slug": "aembit",
    "name": "Aembit",
    "listing": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/aembit",
    "markdown": "# Fix list: Aembit\n\nFrom Anchor Terminal's listing at https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/aembit, the October 2026 research run, assessed 8 October 2026. Grade BB, 70.5 out of 100.\n\nThis is everything the published grade says the listing lacks, the biggest possible gain to the total first. It comes from the reason given for each score, the checklist each category was scored against (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist), the provenance checks, the deductions, what we couldn't check and what the review panel asked for. A fix counts at the next check, once it's public.\n\nFor a coding agent working on Aembit: work through the items below in the product, its docs and its public pages. Each category gives the reason for its score, with the points each checklist item earned, and the checklist itself, so the gap is the items that earned less than their points. Change the product, not the wording, and keep a note of what you changed and where it's published.\n\n## 1. Payments \u0026 pricing, 40 out of 100, up to 7.5 more on the total\n\nWhy it scored 40: No x402, MPP or L402 found in the docs, the OpenAPI files or the pricing page (0). Teams is published at $20 per AI agent a month and $20 per workload a month, though its button is Contact Us (20). Starter is free with 3 AI agents or 10 workloads, and the pricing FAQ says no payment information is required (20). A person signs up in a browser at useast2.aembit.io/signup, through a request form or through the AWS or Azure marketplace (0). Total 40.\n\nThe checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-payments):\n\nThe published rubric, also on the [x402 page](https://www.anchorterminal.com/x402/).\n\n- 40, a machine payment protocol (x402, MPP or L402) on the tool's own endpoints. 10 to 30 when it covers only some endpoints or only goes through a third party, and the note says which.\n- 20, per-call or per-unit pricing published without a login. 10 for public plan-only pricing, 0 for \"contact sales\" or prices behind a login.\n- 20, a free tier or trial that doesn't need a card.\n- 20, autonomous onboarding, meaning an agent can get access without a person signing up in a browser (keyless use, x402, a programmatic key API).\n\nPayment platforms and agent wallets rarely charge for their own API over a machine protocol, so the first line has steps for them, and the highest one that applies counts. 40 when x402, MPP or L402 runs on all their own endpoints, 30 when it runs on part of their own API, 25 when their merchants can accept one, 20 for running a facilitator, 15 for paying as a buyer, and 0 when the only protocol is their own. Merchant acceptance sits above a facilitator because the platform's own customers can charge agents through it, while a facilitator settles for sellers who wire up the protocol themselves. The counter-argument (a facilitator does more for the protocol as a whole) has a point. Each note says which step applied.\n\nOpen-source software you run yourself is scored on its hosted or paid option if it has one. A free, self-hosted package with nothing to buy gets 20, 20 and 20 for the last three lines, and 0 to 40 for the first only if it ships a payment protocol.\n\n## 2. Reliability, 65 out of 100, up to 7 more on the total\n\nWhy it scored 65: Graded as a hosted service. Statuspage at status.aembit.io with two components, Management Portal (Admin and API) and Control Plane (20). One incident in the 90 days to 8 October 2026, the admin console unavailable for five minutes on 14 July during a service upgrade (30). No rate limit figures found. The Aembit MCP Server page says it has no application-level rate limiting and caps `perPage` at 100 (0). The Edge API and the MCP Authorisation Server list 429 responses, and the docs advise caching tokens until near expiry, but no Retry-After or back-off guidance for callers and no idempotency keys were found (5). No SLA is published, and the docs send SLA details to support (0). The Cloud API is v1 and the Edge API 1.0.0 with no beta label, though MCP Identity Gateway began as a limited beta on 28 January 2026 and the docs don't state its current status (10). Total 65.\n\nThe checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-reliability):\n\nHosted APIs, MCP servers, models and platforms.\n\n- 20, a public status page with component history (Statuspage, Instatus, BetterStack or the vendor's own).\n- 0 to 30, the incident record for the last 90 days on that page. 30 for a clean record or trivial incidents only, 20 for minor incidents only, 10 for one major outage (an hour or more of a core API down, or errors across the board), 0 for several. 5 when there's no history we could read, and the note says so.\n- 15, rate limits documented with numbers.\n- 15, documented 429 or overload handling (Retry-After, backoff guidance), and idempotency keys or safe-retry guidance where writes are involved.\n- 10, an SLA published for any paid tier.\n- 10, the surface agents use is generally available, not beta or preview.\n\nLocal packages, SDKs, frameworks and stdio MCP servers.\n\n- 20, installs from an official package with supported runtimes stated.\n- 25, a public CI and test suite, passing on the default branch.\n- 0 to 25, open crash or regression issues relative to activity (25 for few and handled, 0 for many, old and unanswered).\n- 15, semver discipline and breaking changes called out in a changelog.\n- 15, version 1.0 or later, or declared stable.\n\nProtocols are read from their reference implementations, the public facilitators or servers, spec stability and test vectors.\n\n## 3. Agent ergonomics, 72 out of 100, up to 4.6 more on the total\n\nWhy it scored 72: The Edge API is two calls that return one credential, and the Aembit MCP Server has three read-only tools (22). Cloud API lists take `page`, `per-page`, `order`, `filter` and `group-by`, and event queries take time spans and severity (20). Standard HTTP status codes with per-endpoint tables for the Edge API, and JSON-RPC errors from the gateway, but no catalogue of Cloud API error bodies (12). No idempotency keys found. Credential requests are repeatable and the MCP server is read-only, and the gateway passes tool annotations through (8). TypeScript SDK on npm, a CLI and a Terraform provider. The Python SDK is in the repository at 0.1.0 and was not on PyPI on 8 October 2026 (10). Total 72.\n\nThe checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-ergonomics):\n\n- 0 to 25, context cost. For MCP, the number and size of the tool definitions (25 for ten or fewer compact tools, 15 for 11 to 30, 5 for more than 30, plus up to 10 back for toolsets, dynamic loading or read-only subsets). For APIs, whether responses can be sized (field selection, limits, summaries).\n- 20, pagination, filtering and output-size controls.\n- 20, actionable, documented error responses, codes and messages an agent can recover from.\n- 20, idempotency or safe retries, and for MCP the `readOnlyHint` and `destructiveHint` annotations.\n- 15, sensible defaults, few required parameters, and official SDKs in at least two languages.\n\nModels are read for tool use, structured output, prompt caching, context length, batch and SDKs. Frameworks for how much code and how many defaults a tool-calling agent with MCP needs.\n\n## 4. Transparency \u0026 trust, 60 out of 100, up to 3.5 more on the total\n\nMade of editorial 42, provenance 78.\n\nWhy it scored 60: Closed service under terms of service last reviewed 14 July 2026, with the Edge SDKs under Apache-2.0 (15). The privacy policy of 5 May 2026 covers the platform, and a docs page lists the metadata collected (admin email, name and IP address, workload IP addresses and identifiers). Event log retention is 24 hours on Starter and 7 days on Teams for agents. No retention period was found in the privacy policy and no DPA was found (14). The changelog has a Deprecated filter and the docs flag deprecated settings, but no deprecation policy with a notice period was found (8). Status posts name us-east-2 and us-west-2. No sub-processor list was found, and the trust centre returned 403 to our reader (5). Total 42.\n\nThe checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-transparency):\n\n- 0 to 30, source availability and licence clarity. 30 for open source under an OSI licence, 15 for closed with clear terms, 0 for unclear terms.\n- 0 to 30, data handling and retention statements that agree with each other (privacy policy, DPA, retention periods, subprocessors).\n- 0 to 20, a deprecation policy or notices with dates.\n- 0 to 20, telemetry disclosed with an opt-out (local software), or subprocessors and data locations disclosed (hosted).\n\nThe other half of Transparency and trust is the provenance score, computed from checked facts (below). The category score is the mean of the two.\n\nProvenance checks not met in full (half of this category, computed from checked facts):\n\n- Domain age: aembit.io, registered 2021-03-14 (5 years) (11 of 15)\n- Terms of service: read, states 5 of the 7 things a reader expects, and has 2 clauses that cost points (4.3 of 10)\n- Privacy policy: read, states 5 of the 8 things a reader expects (7.8 of 10)\n- security.txt: not found (0 of 10)\n\n## 5. Security \u0026 auth, 84 out of 100, up to 2.8 more on the total\n\nWhy it scored 84: The API accepts only Bearer access tokens and the docs say long-lived credentials aren't supported. Aembit API tokens last 1 hour by default, workloads authenticate by attestation through Trust Providers, and MCP clients use OAuth 2.1 with PKCE and dynamic client registration or a Client ID Metadata Document (30). Roles set No Access, Read Only or Read/Write per resource type and can be limited to Resource Sets, an Auditor system role exists, and MCP Tool Access Control can hide or block tools, though it is off until support enables it. No confirmation step for destructive API calls was found (16). The gateway relays MCP server content, and a Content Security Provider can send tool traffic to CrowdStrike AIDR for inspection (11). Audit logs, access authorisation events and workload events with export by Log Streams (15). SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 stated in the docs, with reports under NDA. No security.txt, bug bounty or public advisories found, and the trust centre returned 403 to our reader (12). Total 84.\n\nThe checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-security):\n\n- 0 to 30, the credential model. 30 for OAuth 2.1 with scopes, or scoped and revocable keys with rotation. 20 for plain revocable API keys. 10 for one all-powerful key. 10 off when a secret can travel in a URL query string as a documented option.\n- 0 to 20, read-only or least-privilege modes, and confirmation or approval for destructive actions.\n- 0 to 15, prompt-injection posture where the tool returns untrusted content (documented mitigations or guidance). A tool that returns no untrusted content gets 10.\n- 0 to 15, audit logs or per-call visibility for the operator.\n- 0 to 20, a security programme. security.txt or a disclosure policy, a bug bounty, SOC 2 or ISO 27001, advisories handled in public.\n\nModels are read for retention, whether API data trains models (and whether that's off by default), zero-retention options and certifications. Frameworks for telemetry defaults, approval hooks, guardrails and sandboxing.\n\n## 6. Schema \u0026 documentation, 85 out of 100, up to 2.4 more on the total\n\nWhy it scored 85: OpenAPI 3.1.1 files for the Cloud API (78 paths, 171 operations) and the Edge API (2 operations) download from docs.aembit.io without a login (25). llms.txt, per-page Markdown, split API reference files and a docs bundle on GitHub (10). The guides say when to pick the MCP Identity Gateway over the MCP Authorisation Server, and an SDK over Agent Proxy, and 170 of 171 Cloud operations carry a summary or description (16). 188 Cloud schemas, 44 with required fields, and enums on the Edge API credential type, but most Edge fields are nullable strings (9). curl examples and status code tables, with the MCP Authorisation Server's table described as not exhaustive and no Cloud API error catalogue (10). `/api/v1` in the path and a dated changelog with RSS (15). Total 85.\n\nThe checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-schema):\n\nAPIs and MCP servers.\n\n- 25, a machine-readable contract (a public OpenAPI file or similar; for MCP, typed JSON Schema inputs on every tool).\n- 10, llms.txt or Markdown docs served for agents.\n- 0 to 20, descriptions that say what a tool is for, when to use it and when not to, read from the tool definitions in the source or the API reference.\n- 0 to 15, typed inputs with enums, constraints and required fields, and no free-form JSON blobs.\n- 0 to 15, examples and documented error responses.\n- 15, versioning and a public changelog.\n\nModels are read from the API reference, the OpenAPI file, llms.txt, the structured-output and tool-use docs and the model cards. Frameworks from docs a model can follow, typed interfaces, examples and the API reference.\n\n## 7. Maintenance \u0026 community, 80 out of 100, up to 1.8 more on the total\n\nWhy it scored 80: MCP Identity Gateway 1.34.6034 on 7 October 2026 and Aembit CLI 1.34.6014 on 5 October (30). Gateway versions on 7 and 18 August, 15 September and 7 October 2026 (20). Closed service with a public changelog and RSS, a knowledge base and ticket support, with community support only on the free plan (11 of 15). @aembit/edge-sdk 1.34.1 on 7 September 2026 is current, and the Python SDK is unpublished (12). The SDK repository has CI, release and Renovate workflows. We couldn't see their run status (7). Total 80.\n\nThe checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-maintenance):\n\n- 0 to 30, time since the last release, or the last published model or API change for a closed service. 30 within 30 days, 20 within 90, 10 within 180, 0 older.\n- 20, at least three releases or dated changelog entries in the last 90 days.\n- 0 to 25, responsiveness. Issues and pull requests answered on GitHub (the open issues and how recent the replies are). For closed services, a public changelog and a support or community channel that answers, 0 to 15.\n- 15, presence in the official MCP registry under a verified namespace (MCP servers), or current official SDKs (APIs and models).\n- 10, package health, current dependencies and CI.\n\nModels are read for deprecation notice periods and model churn rather than release counts.\n\n## What we couldn't check\n\nWhat we couldn't read counted as absent. Publishing it on a page a plain HTTP fetch can read (not only in a browser) lets the next check count it.\n\n- unchecked: the trust centre at trust.aembit.io returned 403 to our reader, so any sub-processor list, DPA or report index there is unread. Transparency and Security score those items as not found.\n- unchecked: GitHub stars and CI run status for Aembit/edge-sdks. The GitHub API refused us for its rate limit.\n- Whether MCP Identity Gateway is generally available. The version table calls 1.28.4136 (28 January 2026) an initial limited beta and no later statement was found.\n- No rate limit figures, SLA, deprecation policy, DPA or security.txt were found in the reviewed pages.\n- The Edge API OpenAPI file gives https://aembit.io/terms as its terms of service, which returned 404. The governing terms are at https://aembit.io/terms-of-service/.\n- The docs say the Edge SDKs are available for TypeScript and Python, but pypi.org/project/aembit-edge-sdk returned 404 and the repository's pyproject.toml is at 0.1.0.\n- Whether the Teams plan can be bought without talking to sales. Its button on the pricing page is Contact Us.\n\n## Weaknesses\n\n- No rate limit figures in the reviewed documentation. The Edge API lists 429 responses without limits or Retry-After guidance\n- No SLA is published. The docs send SLA questions to Aembit support\n- The managed MCP Identity Gateway endpoint is requested through an Aembit representative, and MCP Tool Access Control is enabled by support\n- The Python Edge SDK is in the repository at 0.1.0 but pypi.org/project/aembit-edge-sdk returned 404 on 8 October 2026\n- No DPA, sub-processor list or security.txt found on aembit.io. The trust centre returned 403 to our reader\n\n## What costs an agent a turn today\n\nThe notes we give agents before they call it. Each one is a workaround an agent shouldn't need.\n\n- Read the API Base URL and token from the tenant's Profile page. Tokens last 1 hour by default, so plan to refresh\n- Send `X-Aembit-ResourceSet` on Cloud API, Edge API and MCP calls outside the default Resource Set, or the request runs against the default set\n- Cache the Edge API access token from `/edge/v1/auth` until near expiry before calling `/edge/v1/credentials`. Both endpoints can answer 429\n- Point MCP clients at `https://\u003cgateway-host\u003e/mcp`. The `/me` path is deprecated\n- Expect tool names prefixed with the Server Workload name behind the MCP Identity Gateway, and keep `perPage` at 100 or less on the Aembit MCP Server\n\n## When it's done\n\nSend what changed and where it's published as a dispute (https://www.anchorterminal.com/builders/#disputes, or `POST https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/contact` with `\"kind\": \"dispute\"`). Disputes are answered in public, and the listing is checked again by the same checklist. Paying for an audit or a listing claim changes nothing here.\n",
    "grade": "BB",
    "score": 70.5,
    "assessed": "2026-10-08",
    "run": "October 2026 research run",
    "categories": [
      {
        "key": "payments",
        "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing",
        "score": 40,
        "maxGain": 7.5,
        "reason": "No x402, MPP or L402 found in the docs, the OpenAPI files or the pricing page (0). Teams is published at $20 per AI agent a month and $20 per workload a month, though its button is Contact Us (20). Starter is free with 3 AI agents or 10 workloads, and the pricing FAQ says no payment information is required (20). A person signs up in a browser at useast2.aembit.io/signup, through a request form or through the AWS or Azure marketplace (0). Total 40.",
        "checklist": [
          "The published rubric, also on the [x402 page](https://www.anchorterminal.com/x402/).",
          "- 40, a machine payment protocol (x402, MPP or L402) on the tool's own endpoints. 10 to 30 when it covers only some endpoints or only goes through a third party, and the note says which.\n- 20, per-call or per-unit pricing published without a login. 10 for public plan-only pricing, 0 for \"contact sales\" or prices behind a login.\n- 20, a free tier or trial that doesn't need a card.\n- 20, autonomous onboarding, meaning an agent can get access without a person signing up in a browser (keyless use, x402, a programmatic key API).",
          "Payment platforms and agent wallets rarely charge for their own API over a machine protocol, so the first line has steps for them, and the highest one that applies counts. 40 when x402, MPP or L402 runs on all their own endpoints, 30 when it runs on part of their own API, 25 when their merchants can accept one, 20 for running a facilitator, 15 for paying as a buyer, and 0 when the only protocol is their own. Merchant acceptance sits above a facilitator because the platform's own customers can charge agents through it, while a facilitator settles for sellers who wire up the protocol themselves. The counter-argument (a facilitator does more for the protocol as a whole) has a point. Each note says which step applied.",
          "Open-source software you run yourself is scored on its hosted or paid option if it has one. A free, self-hosted package with nothing to buy gets 20, 20 and 20 for the last three lines, and 0 to 40 for the first only if it ships a payment protocol."
        ],
        "checklistUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-payments"
      },
      {
        "key": "reliability",
        "name": "Reliability",
        "score": 65,
        "maxGain": 7,
        "reason": "Graded as a hosted service. Statuspage at status.aembit.io with two components, Management Portal (Admin and API) and Control Plane (20). One incident in the 90 days to 8 October 2026, the admin console unavailable for five minutes on 14 July during a service upgrade (30). No rate limit figures found. The Aembit MCP Server page says it has no application-level rate limiting and caps `perPage` at 100 (0). The Edge API and the MCP Authorisation Server list 429 responses, and the docs advise caching tokens until near expiry, but no Retry-After or back-off guidance for callers and no idempotency keys were found (5). No SLA is published, and the docs send SLA details to support (0). The Cloud API is v1 and the Edge API 1.0.0 with no beta label, though MCP Identity Gateway began as a limited beta on 28 January 2026 and the docs don't state its current status (10). Total 65.",
        "checklist": [
          "Hosted APIs, MCP servers, models and platforms.",
          "- 20, a public status page with component history (Statuspage, Instatus, BetterStack or the vendor's own).\n- 0 to 30, the incident record for the last 90 days on that page. 30 for a clean record or trivial incidents only, 20 for minor incidents only, 10 for one major outage (an hour or more of a core API down, or errors across the board), 0 for several. 5 when there's no history we could read, and the note says so.\n- 15, rate limits documented with numbers.\n- 15, documented 429 or overload handling (Retry-After, backoff guidance), and idempotency keys or safe-retry guidance where writes are involved.\n- 10, an SLA published for any paid tier.\n- 10, the surface agents use is generally available, not beta or preview.",
          "Local packages, SDKs, frameworks and stdio MCP servers.",
          "- 20, installs from an official package with supported runtimes stated.\n- 25, a public CI and test suite, passing on the default branch.\n- 0 to 25, open crash or regression issues relative to activity (25 for few and handled, 0 for many, old and unanswered).\n- 15, semver discipline and breaking changes called out in a changelog.\n- 15, version 1.0 or later, or declared stable.",
          "Protocols are read from their reference implementations, the public facilitators or servers, spec stability and test vectors."
        ],
        "checklistUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-reliability"
      },
      {
        "key": "ergonomics",
        "name": "Agent ergonomics",
        "score": 72,
        "maxGain": 4.6,
        "reason": "The Edge API is two calls that return one credential, and the Aembit MCP Server has three read-only tools (22). Cloud API lists take `page`, `per-page`, `order`, `filter` and `group-by`, and event queries take time spans and severity (20). Standard HTTP status codes with per-endpoint tables for the Edge API, and JSON-RPC errors from the gateway, but no catalogue of Cloud API error bodies (12). No idempotency keys found. Credential requests are repeatable and the MCP server is read-only, and the gateway passes tool annotations through (8). TypeScript SDK on npm, a CLI and a Terraform provider. The Python SDK is in the repository at 0.1.0 and was not on PyPI on 8 October 2026 (10). Total 72.",
        "checklist": [
          "- 0 to 25, context cost. For MCP, the number and size of the tool definitions (25 for ten or fewer compact tools, 15 for 11 to 30, 5 for more than 30, plus up to 10 back for toolsets, dynamic loading or read-only subsets). For APIs, whether responses can be sized (field selection, limits, summaries).\n- 20, pagination, filtering and output-size controls.\n- 20, actionable, documented error responses, codes and messages an agent can recover from.\n- 20, idempotency or safe retries, and for MCP the `readOnlyHint` and `destructiveHint` annotations.\n- 15, sensible defaults, few required parameters, and official SDKs in at least two languages.",
          "Models are read for tool use, structured output, prompt caching, context length, batch and SDKs. Frameworks for how much code and how many defaults a tool-calling agent with MCP needs."
        ],
        "checklistUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-ergonomics"
      },
      {
        "key": "transparency",
        "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust",
        "score": 60,
        "maxGain": 3.5,
        "reason": "Closed service under terms of service last reviewed 14 July 2026, with the Edge SDKs under Apache-2.0 (15). The privacy policy of 5 May 2026 covers the platform, and a docs page lists the metadata collected (admin email, name and IP address, workload IP addresses and identifiers). Event log retention is 24 hours on Starter and 7 days on Teams for agents. No retention period was found in the privacy policy and no DPA was found (14). The changelog has a Deprecated filter and the docs flag deprecated settings, but no deprecation policy with a notice period was found (8). Status posts name us-east-2 and us-west-2. No sub-processor list was found, and the trust centre returned 403 to our reader (5). Total 42.",
        "blend": "editorial 42, provenance 78",
        "checklist": [
          "- 0 to 30, source availability and licence clarity. 30 for open source under an OSI licence, 15 for closed with clear terms, 0 for unclear terms.\n- 0 to 30, data handling and retention statements that agree with each other (privacy policy, DPA, retention periods, subprocessors).\n- 0 to 20, a deprecation policy or notices with dates.\n- 0 to 20, telemetry disclosed with an opt-out (local software), or subprocessors and data locations disclosed (hosted).",
          "The other half of Transparency and trust is the provenance score, computed from checked facts (below). The category score is the mean of the two."
        ],
        "checklistUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-transparency"
      },
      {
        "key": "security",
        "name": "Security \u0026 auth",
        "score": 84,
        "maxGain": 2.8,
        "reason": "The API accepts only Bearer access tokens and the docs say long-lived credentials aren't supported. Aembit API tokens last 1 hour by default, workloads authenticate by attestation through Trust Providers, and MCP clients use OAuth 2.1 with PKCE and dynamic client registration or a Client ID Metadata Document (30). Roles set No Access, Read Only or Read/Write per resource type and can be limited to Resource Sets, an Auditor system role exists, and MCP Tool Access Control can hide or block tools, though it is off until support enables it. No confirmation step for destructive API calls was found (16). The gateway relays MCP server content, and a Content Security Provider can send tool traffic to CrowdStrike AIDR for inspection (11). Audit logs, access authorisation events and workload events with export by Log Streams (15). SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 stated in the docs, with reports under NDA. No security.txt, bug bounty or public advisories found, and the trust centre returned 403 to our reader (12). Total 84.",
        "checklist": [
          "- 0 to 30, the credential model. 30 for OAuth 2.1 with scopes, or scoped and revocable keys with rotation. 20 for plain revocable API keys. 10 for one all-powerful key. 10 off when a secret can travel in a URL query string as a documented option.\n- 0 to 20, read-only or least-privilege modes, and confirmation or approval for destructive actions.\n- 0 to 15, prompt-injection posture where the tool returns untrusted content (documented mitigations or guidance). A tool that returns no untrusted content gets 10.\n- 0 to 15, audit logs or per-call visibility for the operator.\n- 0 to 20, a security programme. security.txt or a disclosure policy, a bug bounty, SOC 2 or ISO 27001, advisories handled in public.",
          "Models are read for retention, whether API data trains models (and whether that's off by default), zero-retention options and certifications. Frameworks for telemetry defaults, approval hooks, guardrails and sandboxing."
        ],
        "checklistUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-security"
      },
      {
        "key": "schema",
        "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation",
        "score": 85,
        "maxGain": 2.4,
        "reason": "OpenAPI 3.1.1 files for the Cloud API (78 paths, 171 operations) and the Edge API (2 operations) download from docs.aembit.io without a login (25). llms.txt, per-page Markdown, split API reference files and a docs bundle on GitHub (10). The guides say when to pick the MCP Identity Gateway over the MCP Authorisation Server, and an SDK over Agent Proxy, and 170 of 171 Cloud operations carry a summary or description (16). 188 Cloud schemas, 44 with required fields, and enums on the Edge API credential type, but most Edge fields are nullable strings (9). curl examples and status code tables, with the MCP Authorisation Server's table described as not exhaustive and no Cloud API error catalogue (10). `/api/v1` in the path and a dated changelog with RSS (15). Total 85.",
        "checklist": [
          "APIs and MCP servers.",
          "- 25, a machine-readable contract (a public OpenAPI file or similar; for MCP, typed JSON Schema inputs on every tool).\n- 10, llms.txt or Markdown docs served for agents.\n- 0 to 20, descriptions that say what a tool is for, when to use it and when not to, read from the tool definitions in the source or the API reference.\n- 0 to 15, typed inputs with enums, constraints and required fields, and no free-form JSON blobs.\n- 0 to 15, examples and documented error responses.\n- 15, versioning and a public changelog.",
          "Models are read from the API reference, the OpenAPI file, llms.txt, the structured-output and tool-use docs and the model cards. Frameworks from docs a model can follow, typed interfaces, examples and the API reference."
        ],
        "checklistUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-schema"
      },
      {
        "key": "maintenance",
        "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community",
        "score": 80,
        "maxGain": 1.8,
        "reason": "MCP Identity Gateway 1.34.6034 on 7 October 2026 and Aembit CLI 1.34.6014 on 5 October (30). Gateway versions on 7 and 18 August, 15 September and 7 October 2026 (20). Closed service with a public changelog and RSS, a knowledge base and ticket support, with community support only on the free plan (11 of 15). @aembit/edge-sdk 1.34.1 on 7 September 2026 is current, and the Python SDK is unpublished (12). The SDK repository has CI, release and Renovate workflows. We couldn't see their run status (7). Total 80.",
        "checklist": [
          "- 0 to 30, time since the last release, or the last published model or API change for a closed service. 30 within 30 days, 20 within 90, 10 within 180, 0 older.\n- 20, at least three releases or dated changelog entries in the last 90 days.\n- 0 to 25, responsiveness. Issues and pull requests answered on GitHub (the open issues and how recent the replies are). For closed services, a public changelog and a support or community channel that answers, 0 to 15.\n- 15, presence in the official MCP registry under a verified namespace (MCP servers), or current official SDKs (APIs and models).\n- 10, package health, current dependencies and CI.",
          "Models are read for deprecation notice periods and model churn rather than release counts."
        ],
        "checklistUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-maintenance"
      }
    ],
    "provenance": [
      {
        "label": "Domain age",
        "value": "aembit.io, registered 2021-03-14 (5 years)",
        "points": 11,
        "max": 15
      },
      {
        "label": "Terms of service",
        "value": "read, states 5 of the 7 things a reader expects, and has 2 clauses that cost points",
        "points": 4.3,
        "max": 10
      },
      {
        "label": "Privacy policy",
        "value": "read, states 5 of the 8 things a reader expects",
        "points": 7.8,
        "max": 10
      },
      {
        "label": "security.txt",
        "value": "not found",
        "points": 0,
        "max": 10
      }
    ],
    "unchecked": [
      "unchecked: the trust centre at trust.aembit.io returned 403 to our reader, so any sub-processor list, DPA or report index there is unread. Transparency and Security score those items as not found.",
      "unchecked: GitHub stars and CI run status for Aembit/edge-sdks. The GitHub API refused us for its rate limit.",
      "Whether MCP Identity Gateway is generally available. The version table calls 1.28.4136 (28 January 2026) an initial limited beta and no later statement was found.",
      "No rate limit figures, SLA, deprecation policy, DPA or security.txt were found in the reviewed pages.",
      "The Edge API OpenAPI file gives https://aembit.io/terms as its terms of service, which returned 404. The governing terms are at https://aembit.io/terms-of-service/.",
      "The docs say the Edge SDKs are available for TypeScript and Python, but pypi.org/project/aembit-edge-sdk returned 404 and the repository's pyproject.toml is at 0.1.0.",
      "Whether the Teams plan can be bought without talking to sales. Its button on the pricing page is Contact Us."
    ],
    "weaknesses": [
      "No rate limit figures in the reviewed documentation. The Edge API lists 429 responses without limits or Retry-After guidance",
      "No SLA is published. The docs send SLA questions to Aembit support",
      "The managed MCP Identity Gateway endpoint is requested through an Aembit representative, and MCP Tool Access Control is enabled by support",
      "The Python Edge SDK is in the repository at 0.1.0 but pypi.org/project/aembit-edge-sdk returned 404 on 8 October 2026",
      "No DPA, sub-processor list or security.txt found on aembit.io. The trust centre returned 403 to our reader"
    ],
    "agentNotes": [
      "Read the API Base URL and token from the tenant's Profile page. Tokens last 1 hour by default, so plan to refresh",
      "Send `X-Aembit-ResourceSet` on Cloud API, Edge API and MCP calls outside the default Resource Set, or the request runs against the default set",
      "Cache the Edge API access token from `/edge/v1/auth` until near expiry before calling `/edge/v1/credentials`. Both endpoints can answer 429",
      "Point MCP clients at `https://\u003cgateway-host\u003e/mcp`. The `/me` path is deprecated",
      "Expect tool names prefixed with the Server Workload name behind the MCP Identity Gateway, and keep `perPage` at 100 or less on the Aembit MCP Server"
    ],
    "recheck": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/builders/#disputes"
  },
  "meta": {
    "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)",
    "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/",
    "generatedAt": "2026-10-08",
    "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
    "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/",
    "methodology": "0.4",
    "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json",
    "preview": false,
    "run": "2026-10-01",
    "runLabel": "October 2026 research run"
  }
}