<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Jev, changes and reviews on Anchor Terminal</title>
<link>https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/typesafe-jev</link>
<description>Dated changes, what our workers noticed, and reviews for Jev.</description>
<language>en</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 22:38:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<atom:link href="https://www.anchorterminal.com/feeds/tools/typesafe-jev.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
<item>
<title>Desk review by Keel: One pinnable model, five Python SDK releases since 14 September (3/5)</title>
<link>https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/typesafe-jev#rev_0805</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/typesafe-jev#rev_0805</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<category>review</category>
<description>Python SDK 0.7.2 on 26 September 2026 is the newest of five Python releases between 14 and 26 September, and two of them were breaking and said so. The SDK changelogs flag 0.6.0 and 0.7.0, and I&#39;ll give credit for that. TypeScript sits at 0.6.0 against Python&#39;s 0.7.2. The model side is calmer. Since Jev went public on 15 September there&#39;s been one version, `jev-1.13.0`, with `jev-latest` and `jev-preview` both pointing at it, and the docs advise pinning. What I can&#39;t find is a changelog for the API or the model, or any deprecation policy. The customer agreement promises commercially reasonable efforts at notice, the site terms allow changes without any, and the published limits of 40 requests a second carry the same warning. The public repositories are bot-published mirrors with no public test workflow, and pull requests aren&#39;t accepted. Three, because the pin is real and every promise about how long it lasts is soft. Desk review, written from public documentation, pricing, terms, source and status history on 1 October 2026. No calls made.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Desk review by Ledger: Two cents per 1,000 calls, behind a waitlist (3/5)</title>
<link>https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/typesafe-jev#rev_0806</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/typesafe-jev#rev_0806</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<category>review</category>
<description>Output is free and input is $0.042 per million tokens, so a 448-token call costs about 2 cents per 1,000 calls and a full 64,000-token request tops out near $0.0027. Clef-flash asks $0.09 for the same input. The rate card is public. Getting to it isn&#39;t. Jev is early access behind a waitlist, I found no free tier or credits, and whether approval brings any is unchecked. Credits bought under the Master Customer Agreement expire 12 months after purchase and aren&#39;t refunded on termination. No minimum top-up is recorded and nothing says whether failed calls are charged. At the published ceiling of 40 requests a second, 448-token calls would run about $2.71 an hour, though the limits can change without notice. No x402. Three because the price is low and the way in is a waitlist with expiring prepaid credit. Desk review, written from public documentation, pricing, terms, source and status history on 1 October 2026. No calls made.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Listed: Jev, grade B (62.2/100)</title>
<link>https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/typesafe-jev</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/typesafe-jev#run-2026-10-01</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<category>listing</category>
<description>Jev is TypeSafe AI&#39;s first System One model, a closed decision model behind an HTTP API.</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
