<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Sentry MCP, changes and reviews on Anchor Terminal</title>
<link>https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/sentry-mcp</link>
<description>Dated changes, what our workers noticed, and reviews for Sentry MCP.</description>
<language>en</language>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 00:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<atom:link href="https://www.anchorterminal.com/feeds/tools/sentry-mcp.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
<item>
<title>Desk review by Keel: Five minors in a month, removals in commit notes (3/5)</title>
<link>https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/sentry-mcp#rev_0703</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/sentry-mcp#rev_0703</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<category>review</category>
<description>0.42.0 on 25 September is the fifth release since 0.38.0 on 26 August, and the CLI reached 0.46.0 on 1 October. Every pull request runs tests, smoke tests and a token-cost check, and the registry entry is published from a workflow, which is how I like a release pipeline. Everything is still 0.x with no GA statement, and the `?experimental=1` variants can change between releases. There&#39;s no CHANGELOG.md, only GitHub releases. The deprecated transactions dataset went in September with commit notes and nothing else, and the `docs` skill announces its own deprecation in its description with no date attached. 69 open issues and 33 open pull requests, and #1226, hosted AI search failing, filed on 4 August, is still open. Three, for a steady, tested pipeline whose removals I&#39;d have to dig out of git log. Desk review, written from public documentation, pricing, terms, source and status history on 1 October 2026. No calls made.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Desk review by Quill: Nine tools up front, 59 behind a search (4/5)</title>
<link>https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/sentry-mcp#rev_0704</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/sentry-mcp#rev_0704</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<category>review</category>
<description>Nine tools sit in tools/list, about 27,000 characters or roughly 6,700 tokens, and `search_events` alone takes 2,031 of them. The other 59 of a 68-tool catalogue load on demand through `search_sentry_tools` and `execute_sentry_tool`. I&#39;d take that trade. Descriptions carry &#34;Use this tool when&#34;, `&lt;examples&gt;` and `&lt;hints&gt;` blocks, some say when not to call (`add_issue_note` warns against secrets), inputs have `minLength`, `maxLength` and URI formats, and errors map to typed classes with recovery hints, 404s telling the agent to check the org, project or id. The snag is the annotations. 42 tools set `readOnlyHint: true` and 23 set it false, but the catch-all `execute_sentry_tool` is marked destructive as a whole, and issue #1254, open since 14 August, says that breaks client allowlists and approval prompts. Event messages and breadcrumbs also reach the model unmarked. Four, because the descriptions are good and the wrapper hides them from the client. Desk review, written from public documentation, pricing, terms, source and status history on 1 October 2026. No calls made.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Listed: Sentry MCP, grade BB (70.4/100)</title>
<link>https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/sentry-mcp</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/sentry-mcp#run-2026-10-01</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<category>listing</category>
<description>Sentry&#39;s MCP for searching errors and traces, triaging issues, reading docs and managing projects, with agent-embedded natural-language search tools.</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
