# WeVisOne-VL-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B (slim)

> WeVisOne-VL-2B and WeVisOne-VL-4B score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 61 and 61 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/wevisone-vl-2b-vs-wevisone-vl-4b.md (~7,900 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/wevisone-vl-2b-vs-wevisone-vl-4b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/wevisone-vl-2b-vs-wevisone-vl-4b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

WeVisOne-VL-2B and WeVisOne-VL-4B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- WeVisOne-VL-2B: C 61, rank #83 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/wevisone-vl-2b.min.md
- WeVisOne-VL-4B: C 61, rank #84 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/wevisone-vl-4b.min.md
- WeVisOne-VL-2B, good for Agents that need to locate, count or cut out objects in images on a small GPU, under a permissive licence
- WeVisOne-VL-4B, good for Agents that need to locate, count or cut out objects in images on a small GPU, under a permissive licence

| Category | WeVisOne-VL-2B | WeVisOne-VL-4B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 70 | 70 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 48 | 48 |

| Fact (where they differ) | WeVisOne-VL-2B | WeVisOne-VL-4B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Last release | 2026-10-28 | 2026-10-27 |