# Vaani Developer Platform vs Vocily AI (slim)

> Vocily AI scores 53.9 (D) to Vaani Developer Platform's 44.6 (E) for voice agents. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/vaani-voice-vs-vocily.md (~5,450 tokens) · this version ~3,080 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/vaani-voice-vs-vocily.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/vaani-voice-vs-vocily
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-02
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Vocily AI scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Vaani Developer Platform's 44.6 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do voice agents.

- Vaani Developer Platform: E 44.6, rank #1084 of 1266 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/vaani-voice.min.md
- Vocily AI: D 53.9, rank #845 of 1266 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/vocily.min.md
- Vaani Developer Platform, good for Outbound and inbound phone agents and campaigns for Indian businesses, with Hindi, Hinglish and Indian carriers, India DND checks and TRAI calling windows built in, plus WebRTC sessions for apps. Also Runs on your own machine; No incidents deducted, where Vocily AI loses 5 points for them.
- Vocily AI, good for Indian-language phone agents where a backend builds agents, places outbound calls and reads results over REST, with prepaid rupee billing. Ahead on Reliability, 40 against 28; Schema & documentation, 90 against 57; Agent ergonomics, 84 against 64; Payments & pricing, 40 against 22; Transparency & trust, 48 against 42.

| Category | Vaani Developer Platform | Vocily AI |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 28 | 40 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 57 | 90 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 64 | 84 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 44 | 46 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 22 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 59 | 61 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 42 | 48 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Vaani Developer Platform | Vocily AI |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Vaani AI Research Private Limited | Vocily AI Private Limited |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.vaanivoice.ai` | `https://api.vocily.ai` |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under Vaani AI Research's terms of service. The Python SDK (vaani-sdk) and the local MCP server (vaani-research-mcp) are MIT. The SDK's full source ships in its PyPI sdist, and the MCP server's npm package holds only the bundled JavaScript | Proprietary service under Vocily's terms of service. No open-source code or published package was found |
| Tools exposed | 9 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2026-09-30 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | 2026-06-10 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2026-09-03 |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 14 npm/wk, 19 PyPI/wk | none |

Why the edge:
- Schema & documentation, Vocily AI +33: Vaani Developer Platform 57 (A public OpenAPI 3.1 file at docs.vaani.dev/api-reference/openapi.json, version 2.0.0, but it holds 5 of the 24 operations in the API reference (trigger-call, call history, transcript, stream, call details). It declares the key only as a header parameter with no security scheme, its trigger-call schema leaves out `medium` and `modify_agent`, and four response schemas are empty. The MCP tools have typed zod inputs (8 of 25). llms.txt, llms-full.txt and a Markdown copy of each page on Mintlify (10). Pages explain what each route is for and warn where it matters, such as dispatch acceptance not meaning a completed call, transcripts returning 404 while processing, and real paid calls from trigger_call (14 of 20). Ranges and enums are documented (`medium`, `voice_speed` 0.6 to 1.4, `page_size` up to 200, campaign retries 1 to 10, campaign status), but `metadata`, `modify_agent` and three MCP tool payloads are free-form objects (9 of 15). Request examples in cURL, Python and JavaScript on every endpoint, a campaign error-code table, 422 and 404 bodies and an SDK exception table by status. No single error reference for the whole API (12 of 15). The docs state API version 2.0.0, but no changelog or release notes page was found (4 of 15). 8+10+14+9+12+4 = 57.); Vocily AI 90 (A public OpenAPI 3.1 file with 54 operations at docs.vocily.ai/developers/openapi.json (25). llms.txt, llms-full.txt and a Markdown copy of every page (10). Pages say what each route is for and what to use instead, such as webhooks over polling and dashboard batches over a loop of calls, though some operation titles are generated names such as Create Kb (16 of 20). Bodies refuse unknown fields and carry ranges and enums, but list filters such as `status` are plain strings and `variables` and `metadata` are free-form (12 of 15). 196 examples in the spec, a reason-code table by status and a 422 that lists every invalid field (15). The `/v1` prefix and a dated API changes page, which starts on 23 September 2026 and records removals made under `/v1` against the reference's own rule that fields are never removed within a version (12 of 15).)
- Agent ergonomics, Vocily AI +20: Vaani Developer Platform 64 (The local MCP server loads 9 compact tools, and `VAANI_READ_ONLY=true` leaves 3. Transcripts are cut at 20,000 characters by default with a note. The REST API has no field selection or summaries, so 3 off (22 of 25). Call history pages by `page` and `page_size` up to 200 with no filters. The MCP agent filter runs client-side on one page. Agents filter by `search` and `published_only` and campaigns by `status` (12 of 20). Campaign errors carry a machine-readable `code`, a message, the path and a `request_id` (shown as "unknown" in the example). Validation errors list the field location, the SDK maps each status to a typed exception including 402 for a low wallet, and the MCP server adds a hint per status (15 of 20). All 9 MCP tools carry readOnlyHint, destructiveHint and idempotentHint, with `trigger_call` and `campaign_action` marked destructive. No idempotency key on trigger-call, and the MCP client retries a POST once after a timeout or 5xx, so a call can be placed twice. The webhook docs say to deduplicate by event id (8 of 20). A call needs `agent_id`, `contact_number` and `name`, with `medium` defaulting to telephony. One official SDK, Python, sync and async. The npm package is an MCP server, not an SDK (7 of 15). 22+12+15+8+7 = 64.); Vocily AI 84 (List calls take `limit` from 1 to 100, default 20, and return the transcript only with `include=transcript` (20 of 25). Every growing list uses the same cursor envelope, and calls filter by agent, status, direction, origin and date. The bounded lists return bare arrays (18 of 20). Errors carry a machine-readable `detail.code`, a field path on validation failures and an `X-Request-ID` (20). `Idempotency-Key` is required on call creation, agent edits accept `If-Match` on a document revision, and the bulk memory erase previews unless `dry_run` is false. Other writes have no idempotency key (18 of 20). A call needs only `agent_id` and `to_number` and an agent only `name`. No SDK was found in the docs, on npm or on PyPI (8 of 15).)
- Payments & pricing, Vocily AI +18: Vaani Developer Platform 22 (No x402, MPP or L402 (0 of 40). The ₹1 ($0.02) a minute platform fee, number rental, concurrency lines and add-ons are public, and the calculator shows each provider's unit rate without a login. Registry checks, extraction and evaluations "can add separate charges" that aren't priced, and the billing pulse depends on the account, so 3 off (17 of 20). The home page says "Start free on Vaani's Platform", but the pricing page states a prepaid wallet with no free credit, trial minutes or card rule, and we didn't sign up to check, so 5 of 20. A person signs up with email verification at platform.vaani.dev and creates keys in the dashboard (0). 0+17+5+0 = 22.); Vocily AI 40 (No x402, MPP or L402 (0 of 40). Per-minute prices for each speech-to-text model, language model and voice, the platform fee, telephony, per-reply chat prices and WhatsApp fees are public without a login in rupees and US dollars (20). A new organisation gets ₹200 or $2 of credit, and the pricing page says no card (20). Access starts with a browser signup and email verification, and API keys can only be created in the dashboard (0).)
- Reliability, Vocily AI +12: Vaani Developer Platform 28 (Graded on the hosted REST API at api.vaanivoice.ai. No status page. status.vaani.dev and status.vaanivoice.ai don't resolve, and neither the site nor the docs link one (0). With no history to read, 5. No request rate limits are published. The docs give 2 concurrent calls on pay as you go and a per-organisation campaign concurrency cap, so partial credit (5). The SDK raises `RateLimitError` on 429 and the MCP client retries once after 600 ms, but no Retry-After, backoff guidance or idempotency key for call creation is documented (3). The pricing table lists a 99.50 per cent uptime SLA on both plans, but no SLA document or service credits were found and the terms supply the service "as-is" with no warranties, so half (5). The API is version 2.0.0 and isn't labelled beta (10). 0+5+5+3+5+10 = 28.); Vocily AI 40 (Graded on the public REST API at api.vocily.ai, read as a hosted service. No status page found. status.vocily.ai doesn't resolve and neither the site nor the docs link one (0). No readable incident history (5). The limit is published as 300 requests a minute per key, with ten concurrent calls per organisation reported in response headers (15). A 429 carries `Retry-After` and `X-RateLimit` headers, capacity refusals carry `Retry-After`, and `POST /v1/calls` requires an `Idempotency-Key` and replays the original call on a retry (15). No SLA found. The terms say availability isn't guaranteed, and the Enterprise tier mentions only agreed support response commitments (0). The docs don't label the API beta, but four dated releases between 23 and 30 September 2026 changed the `/v1` contract, three of them with removals or changed codes, the API root reports version 0.1.0, and the terms still allow for beta and pre-launch service (5 of 10).)
- Transparency & trust, Vocily AI +6: Vaani Developer Platform 42 (A closed service. The terms name Vaani AI Research Private Limited, its Bengaluru address, CIN, Indian law and Bengaluru courts, but they're undated, written for the website www.vaaniresearch.com, and say nothing on billing, refunds, API use or customer data. The SDK and MCP server are MIT, with the SDK's full source in its PyPI sdist (14 of 30). The privacy policy (undated) keeps data, including voice recordings, for up to 24 months, while the pricing table gives 30 days' retention on pay as you go and zero retention on Enterprise. Voice data trains models only with explicit consent. No DPA found (8 of 30). No deprecation policy. The privacy policy promises 15 days' notice of significant changes, and the terms allow changes and termination without notice (2 of 20). The privacy policy names vendor categories (cloud hosting, analytics, voice transcription) and says data may be stored outside India. Model and telephony providers can be read from the calculator, and India data residency is offered on demand. No subprocessor list or data location for the hosted service (5 of 20). 14+8+2+5 = 29.); Vocily AI 48 (A closed service. The terms (10 June 2026) name no legal entity or governing law, still describe a possible beta, and say paid plans may come later while prices are live (10 of 30). The privacy policy (3 September 2026) is written mainly around WhatsApp data and gives no retention period. The pricing and compliance pages say recordings are kept for the life of the account and deleted on request, and audio and transcript storage are per-agent settings. No DPA found (12 of 30). The reference promises additive changes within `/v1`, but removals shipped on 23 and 25 September 2026 with same-day notes and migration tables and no notice period (6 of 20). The privacy policy mentions vetted providers without naming them. Model providers and carriers can be read from the pricing page and docs, and no data location is documented (6 of 20).)