# Tray.ai API + MCP vs Windmill API + MCP (slim)

> Windmill API + MCP has a score of 56.1 (C) against Tray.ai API + MCP's 55.6 (C). Both do automation workflows. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 40 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/tray-vs-windmill.md (~1,500 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/tray-vs-windmill.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/tray-vs-windmill
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

Windmill API + MCP has a score of 56.1 (C) against Tray.ai API + MCP's 55.6 (C). Both do automation workflows. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 40 points.

- Tray.ai API + MCP: C 55.6, rank #312 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/tray.min.md
- Windmill API + MCP: C 56.1, rank #306 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/windmill.min.md
- Pick Tray.ai API + MCP for reliability (+32), security & auth (+6). Pick Windmill API + MCP for agent ergonomics (+40), payments & pricing (+35), maintenance & community (+27).

| Category | Tray.ai API + MCP | Windmill API + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 72 | 40 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 80 | 79 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 33 | 73 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 66 | 60 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 0 | 35 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 60 | 87 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 69 | 67 |