# Teamwork.com vs Wrike (slim)

> Teamwork.com scores 65.9 (B) on agent readiness against Wrike's 60.1 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Wrike leads on schema & documentation. Both do tasks create. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/teamwork-vs-wrike.md (~2,300 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/teamwork-vs-wrike.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/teamwork-vs-wrike
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-08

Teamwork.com scores 65.9 (B) on agent readiness against Wrike's 60.1 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Wrike leads on schema & documentation. Both do tasks create.

- Teamwork.com: B 65.9, rank #251 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/teamwork.min.md
- Wrike: C 60.1, rank #413 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/wrike.min.md
- Teamwork.com, good for Agencies and services firms already on Teamwork.com that want an assistant to create and update tasks, log time, read workload and budgets, and answer Desk tickets. Ahead on Reliability, 73 against 68; Agent ergonomics, 68 against 63; Maintenance & community, 88 against 63. Also Runs on your own machine; No incidents deducted, where Wrike loses 3 points for them.
- Wrike, good for Teams already on Wrike that want an assistant to find work, create tasks and projects from notes, update status in bulk, comment and check approvals. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 78 against 72.

| Category | Teamwork.com | Wrike |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 73 | 68 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 72 | 78 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 68 | 63 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 58 | 60 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 88 | 63 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 80 | 78 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Teamwork.com | Wrike |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Teamwork Crew Limited | Wrike, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://mcp.ai.teamwork.com` | `https://www.wrike.com/api/v4` |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy), stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Teamwork.com's terms of service. The MCP server on GitHub is MIT | Proprietary service under Wrike's terms. The agent skills repository on GitHub is MIT |
| Tools exposed | 225 | 29 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-06 | 2026-09-17 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | 2025-04-08 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2024-08-19 | 2026-06-01 |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | 26 stars | none |