# Tab vs Tomo (slim)

> Tomo scores 13.1 (F) to Tab's 10.7 (F) for assistants reached by message. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/tab-bot-vs-tomo.md (~3,050 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/tab-bot-vs-tomo.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/tab-bot-vs-tomo
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-13

Tomo scores 13.1 (F) on agent readiness against Tab's 10.7 (F), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistants reached by message.

- Tab: F 10.7, rank #1003 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/tab-bot.min.md
- Tomo: F 13.1, rank #1000 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/tomo.min.md
- Tab, good for A person who wants a texting assistant that browses, calls and buys with tight checkout controls.
- Tomo, good for People who want accountability, check-ins and reminders by text, including in group chats. Ahead on Reliability, 15 against 5; Payments & pricing, 10 against 0.

| Category | Tab | Tomo |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 5 | 15 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 0 | 0 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 0 | 0 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 4 | 0 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 0 | 10 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 58 | 54 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 45 | 47 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Tab | Tomo |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Terrasoft, Inc. | Mapo Labs, Inc. |
| Licence | Closed service under Tab's Terms of Use (Terrasoft, Inc., effective 2 September 2026). | Closed service under Tomo's Terms of Service (Mapo Labs, Inc., last updated 24 September 2026). |
| Last release | none | 2026-09-29 |