# Shufti vs Veriff (slim)

> Veriff scores 61.1 (C) on agent readiness against Shufti's 57.8 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Both do kyc identity. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/shufti-vs-veriff.md (~2,150 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/shufti-vs-veriff.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/shufti-vs-veriff
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Veriff scores 61.1 (C) on agent readiness against Shufti's 57.8 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Both do kyc identity.

- Shufti: C 57.8, rank #538 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/shufti.min.md
- Veriff: C 61.1, rank #436 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/veriff.min.md
- Shufti, good for A team that wants document, face, address, AML and KYB checks behind one endpoint, a free plan for low volume, and an MCP server that hands the person a hosted verification link. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install; Free to start without a card.
- Veriff, good for A team that needs document and selfie verification with public per-verification prices and a trial, and that can run a webhook receiver and HMAC signing. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 82 against 58; Payments & pricing, 40 against 35.

| Category | Shufti | Veriff |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 65 | 62 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 58 | 82 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 47 | 43 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 62 | 63 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 35 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 72 | 74 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 71 | 67 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Shufti | Veriff |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Shufti Pro Limited | Veriff OÜ |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.shuftipro.com` | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Shufti's Terms and Conditions. The licences of the mobile capture SDKs were not checked | Proprietary service. The npm capture SDKs are ISC (@veriff/js-sdk, @veriff/incontext-sdk) and MIT (@veriff/react-native-sdk) |
| Tools exposed | 25 | none |
| Last release | 2026-10-06 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated |  | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-01 | 2026-04-16 |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access |  | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 673 npm/wk | 32 stars, 110k npm/wk |