# ScrapeAtlas vs Scrapingdog (slim)

> ScrapeAtlas scores 63 (B) to Scrapingdog's 39.3 (E) for extraction. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapeatlas-vs-scrapingdog.md (~2,750 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapeatlas-vs-scrapingdog.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapeatlas-vs-scrapingdog
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-30
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

ScrapeAtlas scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against Scrapingdog's 39.3 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Scrapingdog leads on reliability. Both do extraction.

- ScrapeAtlas: B 63, rank #481 of 1226 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/scrapeatlas.min.md
- Scrapingdog: E 39.3, rank #1109 of 1226 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/scrapingdog.min.md
- ScrapeAtlas, good for Agents that need structured public data from a named social, video, forum, marketplace or prediction-market platform, such as a creator's profile and recent posts, a thread's comments, a product's reviews or a market's order book, paid per successful request without a subscription. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 88 against 43; Agent ergonomics, 76 against 44; Security & auth, 55 against 5; Payments & pricing, 55 against 40; Maintenance & community, 70 against 45; Transparency & trust, 61 against 56.
- Scrapingdog, good for A budget agent that wants parsed Google, Amazon or LinkedIn results and can keep the key out of logs. Ahead on Reliability, 62 against 42. Also Runs on your own machine.

| Category | ScrapeAtlas | Scrapingdog |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 42 | 62 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 88 | 43 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 76 | 44 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 55 | 5 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 55 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 70 | 45 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 61 | 56 |

| Fact (where they differ) | ScrapeAtlas | Scrapingdog |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | OD. Media & Technology LLC | Scrapingdog (OpenData Labs) |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.scrapeatlas.com` | `https://api.scrapingdog.com/scrape` |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| Licence | Proprietary service under ScrapeAtlas's Terms of Service. The @scrapeatlas/cli package on npm is MIT with no public source repository | none |
| Tools exposed | 373 | 35 |
| MCP registry | `io.github.OnlineDopamine/scrapeatlas` | `io.github.Darshan972/scrapingdog-mcp` |
| Last release | 2026-10-28 | 2026-07-31 |
| Terms last updated |  | 2026-01-13 |
| Privacy policy last updated |  | 2025-07-17 |
| Customer content may train models |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  | not found in the text |
| Popularity | none | 0 stars, 41 npm/wk, 12 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (2) |