# Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog (slim)

> Scrape.do has a score of 44 (E) against Scrapingdog's 39.3 (E). Both do scraping. The largest gap is reliability, 22 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapingdog.md (~1,600 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapingdog.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapingdog
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

Scrape.do has a score of 44 (E) against Scrapingdog's 39.3 (E). Both do scraping. The largest gap is reliability, 22 points.

- Scrape.do: E 44, rank #406 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/scrape-do.min.md
- Scrapingdog: E 39.3, rank #425 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/scrapingdog.min.md
- Pick Scrape.do for schema & documentation (+14), agent ergonomics (+18), security & auth (+18). Pick Scrapingdog for reliability (+22), payments & pricing (+5), transparency & trust (+8).

| Category | Scrape.do | Scrapingdog |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 40 | 62 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 57 | 43 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 62 | 44 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 23 | 5 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 35 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 45 | 45 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 49 | 57 |