# Scrape.do vs ScrapeGraphAI > ScrapeGraphAI has a score of 68.3 (B) against Scrape.do's 44 (E). Both do scraping. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 55 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapegraphai - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapegraphai.md (~1,700 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapegraphai.min.md (~330 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapegraphai.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-05 ScrapeGraphAI has a score of 68.3 (B) against Scrape.do's 44 (E). Both do scraping. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 55 points. - Scrape.do: grade E, 44/100, rank #406 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/scrape-do.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/scrape-do.json - ScrapeGraphAI: grade B, 68.3/100, rank #128 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/scrapegraphai.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/scrapegraphai.json ## Which one, for what Pick Scrape.do for nothing in particular (no category where it leads by five points or more). Pick ScrapeGraphAI for reliability (+24), schema & documentation (+31), agent ergonomics (+10), security & auth (+16), payments & pricing (+55), maintenance & community (+25), transparency & trust (+12). ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Scrape.do | ScrapeGraphAI | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 40 | 64 | ScrapeGraphAI +24 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 57 | 88 | ScrapeGraphAI +31 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 62 | 72 | ScrapeGraphAI +10 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 23 | 39 | ScrapeGraphAI +16 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 35 | 90 | ScrapeGraphAI +55 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 45 | 70 | ScrapeGraphAI +25 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 49 | 61 | ScrapeGraphAI +12 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **44 · E** | **68.3 · B** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Scrape.do | ScrapeGraphAI | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Scrape.do | ScrapeGraphAI | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.scrape.do/` | `https://v2-api.scrapegraphai.com` | | Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | | Auth | API key | OAuth or key | | Pricing | Freemium | Freemium | | x402 | no | payer tooling only | | Licence | none | none | | Tools exposed | none | 20 | | Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a | | p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | MCP registry | not listed | `io.github.ScrapeGraphAI/scrapegraph-mcp` | | Last release | 2026-07-31 | 2026-07-31 | | Popularity | 2 npm/wk | 2.4k npm/wk, 46k PyPI/wk | | Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Scrape.do.** $29 for 250,000 basic credits, and 429s, 502s and most failures aren't billed. Token travels in the query string on the main API. **ScrapeGraphAI.** An agent can mint an account and key over x402 or MPP with no signup. Rate limits and plan prices differ between docs pages. ## Before you call either ### Scrape.do 1. Start with the default data centre request (1 credit). Add `super=true` or `render=true` only after a block, since they cost 10 and 5 2. Pass `output=markdown` to get LLM-ready text instead of raw HTML 3. Read `Scrape.do-Request-Cost` from the response headers. Some domains cost 10 to 200 credits whatever you pass 4. Treat a 429 as too many concurrent requests and wait for one to finish 5. Keep URLs with `token=` out of logs and shared traces ### ScrapeGraphAI 1. Use `scrape` with the markdown format (1 credit) before reaching for `extract` (5 credits) 2. Read `GET https://v2-api.scrapegraphai.com/api/agent/protocols` for current packs and prices before paying over x402 3. MCP tool calls stop at 60 seconds. Use `crawl_start` and poll for anything longer 4. Back off 1, 2 then 4 seconds on a 429 `rate_limit_exceeded`. No Retry-After is sent 5. Use Orthogonal's x402 gateway when you need to pay per call without a key ## Other comparisons with Scrape.do or ScrapeGraphAI - [Bright Data vs Scrape.do](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bright-data-vs-scrape-do.md) - [Bright Data vs ScrapeGraphAI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bright-data-vs-scrapegraphai.md) - [Jina Reader vs Scrape.do](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrape-do.md) - [Jina Reader vs ScrapeGraphAI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrapegraphai.md) - [Olostep vs Scrape.do](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-scrape-do.md) - [Olostep vs ScrapeGraphAI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-scrapegraphai.md) - [Scrape.do vs Scrapeless](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapeless.md) - [Scrape.do vs Scrapfly](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapfly.md) - [Scrape.do vs ScrapingAnt](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapingant.md) - [Scrape.do vs ScrapingBee](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapingbee.md) - [Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapingdog.md) - [Scrape.do vs Spider](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-spider-cloud.md) - [Scrape.do vs ZenRows](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-zenrows.md) - [ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapeless](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapegraphai-vs-scrapeless.md) - [ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapfly](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapegraphai-vs-scrapfly.md) - [ScrapeGraphAI vs ScrapingAnt](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapegraphai-vs-scrapingant.md) - [ScrapeGraphAI vs ScrapingBee](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapegraphai-vs-scrapingbee.md) - [ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapingdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapegraphai-vs-scrapingdog.md) - [ScrapeGraphAI vs Spider](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapegraphai-vs-spider-cloud.md) - [ScrapeGraphAI vs ZenRows](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapegraphai-vs-zenrows.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapeGraphAI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapegraphai.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs Scrape.do](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrape-do.md) - [Apify MCP Server vs ScrapeGraphAI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apify-mcp-vs-scrapegraphai.md)