# Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B (slim)

> Qwen3.8-27B scores 68.6 (B) to Qwen3.6-27B's 67.2 (B) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-6-27b-vs-qwen3-8-27b.md (~5,950 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-6-27b-vs-qwen3-8-27b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-6-27b-vs-qwen3-8-27b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Qwen3.8-27B scores 68.6 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3.6-27B's 67.2 (B), and leads in 1 of 5 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Qwen3.6-27B: B 67.2, rank #11 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-6-27b.min.md
- Qwen3.8-27B: B 68.6, rank #10 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-8-27b.min.md
- Qwen3.6-27B, good for Agents that want an open coding and tool-calling model with vision on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac, with plain licence terms.
- Qwen3.8-27B, good for Agents that want a capable open model with vision on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac, with the widest runtime support and a plain licence.

| Category | Qwen3.6-27B | Qwen3.8-27B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | 66 | 70 |
| Reach (25%) | 90 | 90 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 36 | 36 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Qwen3.6-27B | Qwen3.8-27B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Last release | 2026-04-22 | 2026-08-14 |