# Qwen3.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B (slim)

> Spark-X2.6-4B and Qwen3.5-9B score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 61 and 60.5 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-5-9b-vs-spark-x2-6-4b.md (~5,950 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-5-9b-vs-spark-x2-6-4b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-5-9b-vs-spark-x2-6-4b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Spark-X2.6-4B and Qwen3.5-9B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.5 (C). Qwen3.5-9B leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Qwen3.5-9B: C 60.5, rank #53 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-5-9b.min.md
- Spark-X2.6-4B: C 61, rank #48 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/spark-x2-6-4b.min.md
- Qwen3.5-9B, good for Agents that want a small multimodal tool-calling cousin on a laptop or a 16 GB GPU, under a plain licence Ahead on Risk, 55 against 50.
- Spark-X2.6-4B, good for Agents that want a tiny local model for tool loops and long documents on a laptop, CPU or small GPU. Ahead on Documentation and upkeep, 41 against 34. Also Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.5 out of 5.

| Category | Qwen3.5-9B | Spark-X2.6-4B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 85 | 85 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 50 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 34 | 41 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Qwen3.5-9B | Spark-X2.6-4B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Alibaba (Qwen team) | SparkLLM (XHToken) |
| Last release | 2026-03-02 | 2026-10-20 |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |