# Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct (slim)

> Qwen3.5-9B scores 60.5 (C) to Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct's 52.6 (D) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-5-9b-vs-qwen3-vl-4b-instruct.md (~6,150 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-5-9b-vs-qwen3-vl-4b-instruct.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-5-9b-vs-qwen3-vl-4b-instruct
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Qwen3.5-9B scores 60.5 (C) on agent readiness against Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct's 52.6 (D), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Qwen3.5-9B: C 60.5, rank #53 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-5-9b.min.md
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct: D 52.6, rank #84 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-vl-4b-instruct.min.md
- Qwen3.5-9B, good for Agents that want a small multimodal tool-calling cousin on a laptop or a 16 GB GPU, under a plain licence Ahead on Capability, 51 against 25; Agent interface, 70 against 60.
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct, good for An agent with 4 GB or more to spare that needs a local model to read images, documents and video Ahead on Reach, 95 against 85.

| Category | Qwen3.5-9B | Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | 51 | 25 |
| Reach (25%) | 85 | 95 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 60 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 34 | 31 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Qwen3.5-9B | Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Last release | 2026-03-02 | 2025-11-01 |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |