# Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B (slim)

> Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 63.6 and 63.2 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-5-122b-a10b-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b.md (~6,350 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-5-122b-a10b-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-5-122b-a10b-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 63.6 (B) and 63.2 (B). Qwen3.6-35B-A3B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: B 63.6, rank #22 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-5-122b-a10b.min.md
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: B 63.2, rank #25 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-6-35b-a3b.min.md
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B, good for Agents with a 128 GB unified-memory machine or two large GPUs that want a capable vision-language model with a plain licence.
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, good for Agents with a 32 GB or larger machine that want a quick, permissively licensed coding and tool-calling cousin with vision. Ahead on Reach, 85 against 80.

| Category | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | 62 | 58 |
| Reach (25%) | 80 | 85 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 39 | 36 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Last release | 2026-02-24 | 2026-04-16 |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |