# Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B (slim)

> Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 64.6 and 63.6 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-5-122b-a10b-vs-qwen3-5-397b-a17b.md (~6,400 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-5-122b-a10b-vs-qwen3-5-397b-a17b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-5-122b-a10b-vs-qwen3-5-397b-a17b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 64.6 (B) and 63.6 (B). Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: B 63.6, rank #22 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-5-122b-a10b.min.md
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B: B 64.6, rank #18 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-5-397b-a17b.min.md
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B, good for Agents with a 128 GB unified-memory machine or two large GPUs that want a capable vision-language model with a plain licence. Ahead on Reach, 80 against 70.
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B, good for Agents with access to an 8-GPU server, or calling a hosted endpoint, that want the strongest open Qwen3.5 with vision and a plain licence. Ahead on Capability, 72 against 62.

| Category | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | 62 | 72 |
| Reach (25%) | 80 | 70 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 39 | 39 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Last release | 2026-02-24 | 2026-02-16 |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |