# Postiz API + MCP vs Typefully > Postiz API + MCP scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Typefully's 49.1 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do social post. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postiz-vs-typefully - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postiz-vs-typefully.md (~2,300 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postiz-vs-typefully.min.md (~630 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postiz-vs-typefully.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-09 Postiz API + MCP scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Typefully's 49.1 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do social post. - Postiz API + MCP: grade C, 59.3/100, rank #500 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/postiz.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/postiz.json - Typefully: grade D, 49.1/100, rank #714 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/typefully.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/typefully.json ## Which one, for what ### Postiz API + MCP (C) Good for: Teams that want to self-host, or want 34 platforms including Mastodon, Farcaster, Discord and Slack on a flat plan. Ahead on: - Reliability, 53 against 27 - Schema & documentation, 88 against 83 - Security & auth, 49 against 38 - Transparency & trust, 81 against 64 Also in its favour: - Open source Watch for: Create-post capped at 90 requests an hour on every Cloud plan ### Typefully (D) Good for: An agent that drafts and schedules posts for one person's or one team's own accounts, with a human reviewing drafts and comments in the Typefully editor. Watch for: Rate limits are described by response headers only. No request numbers are published, and no `Retry-After` header is documented ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Postiz API + MCP | Typefully | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 53 | 27 | Postiz API + MCP +26 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 88 | 83 | Postiz API + MCP +5 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 65 | 62 | Postiz API + MCP +3 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 49 | 38 | Postiz API + MCP +11 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 30 | 30 | even | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 85 | 82 | Postiz API + MCP +3 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 81 | 64 | Postiz API + MCP +17 | | Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | -3 | | | **Total** | | **59.3 · C** | **49.1 · D** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Postiz API + MCP | Typefully | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Postiz (Gitroom) | Typefully Inc. | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.postiz.com/public/v1` | `https://api.typefully.com` | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | | Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key | | Pricing | Paid | Freemium | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | AGPL-3.0 | Proprietary service under Typefully's Terms of Service. The Agent Skill and its CLI script in typefully/agent-skills are MIT | | Tools exposed | 13 | none | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | MCP registry | not listed | `com.typefully/mcp` | | Last release | 2026-09-22 | 2026-10-01 | | Terms last updated | 2026-05-03 | 2026-02-23 | | Privacy policy last updated | 2026-05-03 | no date given | | Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text | | Terms restrict automated access | yes | yes | | Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text | | Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text | | Popularity | 37k stars, 368 npm/wk | none | | Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | none | ## Verdicts **Postiz API + MCP.** AGPL-3.0 and self-hostable with the API and MCP included, 34 platforms. Create-post capped at 90 requests an hour on every Cloud plan. **Typefully.** A public OpenAPI 3.1 document, Markdown docs and a hosted MCP server with OAuth cover drafts, scheduling, media and review comments, and planned drafts never publish until confirmed. Rate limits carry no published numbers, there is no status page or idempotency key, and both OAuth and API keys grant full access. ## Before you call either ### Postiz API + MCP 1. Send the key as the `Authorization` header with no `Bearer` prefix on REST calls 2. Batch several posts into one create request to stay under 90 an hour 3. Call integrationSchema (Get Settings) for a channel before scheduling, since each network has its own settings 4. Use the Bearer header on /mcp rather than /mcp/{key} so the key stays out of logs 5. Read output.errors on a failed schedule call and retry with the corrected fields ### Typefully 1. Call `GET /v2/social-sets` first. Every draft, media, tag and queue path needs a `social_set_id` 2. Use `plan_at` or omit both dates to leave a draft unpublished. `publish_at: "now"` posts at once and is asynchronous 3. Do not retry a failed publish blindly. Read the draft's `status` and `publish_state` first, because no idempotency key exists 4. Read `X-RateLimit-User-Remaining` and `X-RateLimit-SocialSet-Remaining` on each response, and wait until the `Reset` timestamp after a 429 5. Send the key only as `Authorization: Bearer`. The legacy MCP URL with `?TYPEFULLY_API_KEY=` still works and puts the key in logs ## Questions ### Which is better for AI agents, Postiz API + MCP or Typefully? Postiz API + MCP scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Typefully's 49.1 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. ### Do Postiz API + MCP and Typefully need an API key? Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in. ### Can an agent call Postiz API + MCP and Typefully without installing anything? Yes. Postiz API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://api.postiz.com/public/v1 and Typefully at https://api.typefully.com. ### Are Postiz API + MCP and Typefully open source? Postiz API + MCP is open source (AGPL-3.0). No open-source release is listed for Typefully. ## For agents - This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postiz-vs-typefully.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postiz-vs-typefully.min.md - Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "postiz", "b": "typefully"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare postiz typefully` - Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/postiz.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/typefully.json ## Other comparisons with Postiz API + MCP or Typefully - [Ayrshare API + MCP vs Postiz API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ayrshare-vs-postiz.md) - [Ayrshare API + MCP vs Typefully](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ayrshare-vs-typefully.md) - [Blotato vs Postiz API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blotato-vs-postiz.md) - [Blotato vs Typefully](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blotato-vs-typefully.md) - [Buffer API + MCP vs Postiz API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/buffer-vs-postiz.md) - [Buffer API + MCP vs Typefully](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/buffer-vs-typefully.md) - [Zernio (formerly Late) API + MCP vs Postiz API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/late-vs-postiz.md) - [Zernio (formerly Late) API + MCP vs Typefully](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/late-vs-typefully.md) - [Metricool API + MCP vs Postiz API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-postiz.md) - [Metricool API + MCP vs Typefully](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-typefully.md) - [Mixpost API + MCP vs Postiz API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mixpost-vs-postiz.md) - [Mixpost API + MCP vs Typefully](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mixpost-vs-typefully.md) - [OneUp API + MCP vs Postiz API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oneup-vs-postiz.md) - [OneUp API + MCP vs Typefully](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oneup-vs-typefully.md) - [Post Bridge API + MCP vs Postiz API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/post-bridge-vs-postiz.md) - [Post Bridge API + MCP vs Typefully](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/post-bridge-vs-typefully.md) - [Postiz API + MCP vs Publer API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postiz-vs-publer.md) - [Postiz API + MCP vs Upload-Post API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postiz-vs-upload-post.md) - [Publer API + MCP vs Typefully](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/publer-vs-typefully.md) - [Typefully vs Upload-Post API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/typefully-vs-upload-post.md) - [Postiz API + MCP vs X MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postiz-vs-x-mcp.md)