# Postgres MCP Pro vs PostgreSQL (archived MCP reference server) (slim)

> Postgres MCP Pro has a score of 36.7 (F) against PostgreSQL (archived MCP reference server)'s 18.6 (F). Both do sql databases. The largest gap is reliability, 28 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postgres-mcp-pro-vs-postgres-reference-server-archived.md (~1,400 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postgres-mcp-pro-vs-postgres-reference-server-archived.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postgres-mcp-pro-vs-postgres-reference-server-archived
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-04

Postgres MCP Pro has a score of 36.7 (F) against PostgreSQL (archived MCP reference server)'s 18.6 (F). Both do sql databases. The largest gap is reliability, 28 points.

- Postgres MCP Pro: F 36.7, rank #436 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/postgres-mcp-pro.min.md
- PostgreSQL (archived MCP reference server): F 18.6, rank #449 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/postgres-reference-server-archived.min.md
- Pick Postgres MCP Pro for reliability (+28), schema & documentation (+27), agent ergonomics (+19), security & auth (+21), maintenance & community (+8). Pick PostgreSQL (archived MCP reference server) for transparency & trust (+16).

| Category | Postgres MCP Pro | PostgreSQL (archived MCP reference server) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 41 | 13 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 56 | 29 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 57 | 38 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 26 | 5 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 8 | 0 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 61 | 77 |