# Postfleet vs Robotomail (slim)

> Robotomail scores 69.8 (B) to Postfleet's 57.6 (C) for agent inboxes. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postfleet-vs-robotomail.md (~2,200 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postfleet-vs-robotomail.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postfleet-vs-robotomail
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-27
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Robotomail scores 69.8 (B) on agent readiness against Postfleet's 57.6 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent inboxes.

- Postfleet: C 57.6, rank #695 of 1217 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/postfleet.min.md
- Robotomail: B 69.8, rank #186 of 1217 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/robotomail.min.md
- Postfleet, good for A developer whose agent reads mail from strangers and should only see screened text, with server-side approval before sends. Also Runs on your own machine.
- Robotomail, good for A developer who wants one mailbox per agent with replies as events, on a small fixed monthly price. Ahead on Reliability, 73 against 35; Schema & documentation, 90 against 83; Payments & pricing, 35 against 30; Transparency & trust, 73 against 36.

| Category | Postfleet | Robotomail |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 35 | 73 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 83 | 90 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 72 | 72 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 68 | 65 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 35 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 75 | 77 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 36 | 73 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Postfleet | Robotomail |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Postfleet | Tiny Bot Labs Limited |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.postfleet.ai/api/v1` | `https://api.robotomail.com/v1` |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under Postfleet's terms (effective 6 October 2026), which name no company or governing law. The MCP server package @postfleet/mcp and the TypeScript SDK postfleet are MIT on npm; the GitHub repository is a mirror of the MCP server only | Proprietary service under Robotomail's terms of service. The five SDKs on GitHub are MIT |
| Tools exposed | 16 | 6 |
| MCP registry | `ai.postfleet/postfleet` | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-08 | 2026-09-25 |
| Terms last updated |  | 2026-10-05 |
| Privacy policy last updated |  | 2026-09-01 |
| Customer content may train models |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 0 stars | 20 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (4) |