# Poke vs Zapia (slim) > Poke scores 37.6 (F) to Zapia's 17.3 (F) for assistants reached by message. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side. - Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/poke-vs-zapia.md (~3,250 tokens) · this version ~630 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/poke-vs-zapia.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/poke-vs-zapia - Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-13 Poke scores 37.6 (F) on agent readiness against Zapia's 17.3 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Zapia leads on maintenance & community. Both do assistants reached by message. - Poke: F 37.6, rank #960 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/poke.min.md - Zapia: F 17.3, rank #995 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/zapia.min.md - Poke, good for One person who wants an assistant in their text messages that reads and drafts mail, manages a calendar and reaches other apps through MCP. Ahead on Reliability, 51 against 15; Schema & documentation, 42 against 0; Agent ergonomics, 30 against 0; Security & auth, 24 against 3. - Zapia, good for Spanish- and Portuguese-speaking users who want an assistant over their mail, calendar, Drive and WhatsApp in an app. Ahead on Maintenance & community, 56 against 31. | Category | Poke | Zapia | | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability (16%) | 51 | 15 | | Performance (10%) | pending | pending | | Schema & documentation (13%) | 42 | 0 | | Agent ergonomics (13%) | 30 | 0 | | Security & auth (14%) | 24 | 3 | | Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 30 | | Task success (10%) | pending | pending | | Maintenance & community (7%) | 31 | 56 | | Transparency & trust (7%) | 58 | 59 | | Fact (where they differ) | Poke | Zapia | | --- | --- | --- | | Vendor | The Interaction Company of California Inc. | Brainlogic AI S.A.S. | | Transports | HTTP | | | Auth | API key | OAuth or key | | Licence | Proprietary service under Poke's Terms of Service. The `poke` npm package (CLI and Node.js SDK) declares MIT | Closed service under Zapia's terms and conditions (Brainlogic AI SAS). No date was found on the terms. | | llms.txt | yes | no | | Last release | 2026-06-25 | 2026-10-12 | | Terms last updated | 2026-03-17 | | | Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-11 | | | Customer content may train models | yes | | | Terms restrict automated access | yes | | | Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | | | Terms or service can change without notice | yes | | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |