# Plum vs Snoop (slim)

> Plum and Snoop score within a point of each other for personal transactions, 27.4 and 26.7 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/plum-vs-snoop.md (~1,700 tokens) · this version ~480 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/plum-vs-snoop.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/plum-vs-snoop
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-14

Plum and Snoop score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 27.4 (F) and 26.7 (F). Snoop leads on security & auth. Both do personal transactions.

- Plum: F 27.4, rank #1026 of 1076 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/plum.min.md
- Snoop: F 26.7, rank #1027 of 1076 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/snoop.min.md
- Plum, good for UK and European users who want saving and investing automated from their spending. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 10 against 0.
- Snoop, good for UK users who want bills and subscriptions watched and savings suggested at no cost. Ahead on Security & auth, 6 against 0.

| Category | Plum | Snoop |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 60 | 60 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 10 | 0 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 0 | 0 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 0 | 6 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 56 | 55 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 58 | 58 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Plum | Snoop |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Plum Fintech Limited | Usnoop Limited |
| Licence | Closed service under Plum's terms (Plum Fintech Limited and Saveable Limited) | Closed service under Snoop's terms and conditions (Usnoop Limited) |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-12 | 2026-09-30 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-15 | no date given |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |