# PicoClaw vs Skydive (slim)

> Skydive scores 52.1 (D) to PicoClaw's 46.2 (D) for proactive personal assistants. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/picoclaw-vs-skydive.md (~4,050 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/picoclaw-vs-skydive.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/picoclaw-vs-skydive
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-31
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Skydive scores 52.1 (D) on agent readiness against PicoClaw's 46.2 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. PicoClaw leads on reliability, agent ergonomics and payments & pricing. Both do proactive personal assistants.

- PicoClaw: D 46.2, rank #1040 of 1244 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/picoclaw.min.md
- Skydive: D 52.1, rank #899 of 1244 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/skydive.min.md
- PicoClaw, good for A person who wants a chat-app assistant on a cheap Linux board, an old Android phone or a home server, with reminders, web search and file memory, and who accepts running software its maker calls pre-production. Ahead on Reliability, 54 against 41; Agent ergonomics, 66 against 59; Payments & pricing, 60 against 35. Also No key needed to call it; Open source.
- Skydive, good for A person or team who wants hosted agents with their own cloud computers, memory and connected apps, reachable in Slack, email, text and a CLI, and who can drive them from scripts through the CLI. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 81 against 51; Security & auth, 59 against 51; Maintenance & community, 56 against 22; Transparency & trust, 75 against 58. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install.

| Category | PicoClaw | Skydive |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 54 | 41 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 51 | 81 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 66 | 59 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 51 | 59 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 35 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 22 | 56 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 58 | 75 |

| Fact (where they differ) | PicoClaw | Skydive |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | Agent harness | Platform |
| Vendor | Sipeed | Create, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://api.skydive.com/v1` |
| Transports |  | HTTP |
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Licence | MIT | Closed service under the Skydive Terms of Service (Create, Inc.), effective 29 July 2026. The skydive-cli npm package is published under the MIT licence. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-07-03 | 2026-08-26 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models |  | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access |  | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 30k stars | 5.5k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 1.8/5 (4) | none |