# Permit MCP Gateway vs Restate (slim)

> Restate scores 73.3 (BB) on agent readiness against Permit MCP Gateway's 54.1 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Permit MCP Gateway leads on security & auth. Both do hitl approve. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/permit-mcp-gateway-vs-restate.md (~2,100 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/permit-mcp-gateway-vs-restate.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/permit-mcp-gateway-vs-restate
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-08

Restate scores 73.3 (BB) on agent readiness against Permit MCP Gateway's 54.1 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Permit MCP Gateway leads on security & auth. Both do hitl approve.

- Permit MCP Gateway: C 54.1, rank #534 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/permit-mcp-gateway.min.md
- Restate: BB 73.3, rank #78 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/restate.min.md
- Permit MCP Gateway, good for A security team that wants approvals and per-user limits on MCP tools across many clients without touching agent code. Ahead on Security & auth, 80 against 61. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install.
- Restate, good for A team that already writes agent steps as durable handlers and wants a long, cheap wait for a human answer in TypeScript, Python, Java, Go or Rust, with the option to self-host. Ahead on Reliability, 91 against 47; Schema & documentation, 85 against 53; Payments & pricing, 40 against 10; Maintenance & community, 92 against 43; Transparency & trust, 50 against 41. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; Free to start without a card.

| Category | Permit MCP Gateway | Restate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 47 | 91 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 53 | 85 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 83 | 81 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 80 | 61 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 10 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 43 | 92 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 41 | 50 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Permit MCP Gateway | Restate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Permit.io | Restate GmbH |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://{subdomain}.agent.security/mcp` | no (local only) |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Licence | none | BSL 1.1 converting to Apache-2.0 four years after release (server), MIT (SDKs) |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | none | 2026-10-01 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2024-07-29 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | none | 4.5k stars, 329k npm/wk, 76k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | none |