# People Data Labs vs Prospeo API + MCP > People Data Labs scores 64.2 (B) on agent readiness against Prospeo API + MCP's 50.9 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Prospeo API + MCP leads on security & auth and payments & pricing. Both do lead search. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/people-data-labs-vs-prospeo - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/people-data-labs-vs-prospeo.md (~2,450 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/people-data-labs-vs-prospeo.min.md (~630 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/people-data-labs-vs-prospeo.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-09 People Data Labs scores 64.2 (B) on agent readiness against Prospeo API + MCP's 50.9 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Prospeo API + MCP leads on security & auth and payments & pricing. Both do lead search. - People Data Labs: grade B, 64.2/100, rank #326 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/people-data-labs.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/people-data-labs.json - Prospeo API + MCP: grade D, 50.9/100, rank #680 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/prospeo.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/prospeo.json ## Which one, for what ### People Data Labs (B) Good for: Products and pipelines that enrich or search person and company records at volume and can write Elasticsearch or SQL queries. Ahead on: - Reliability, 78 against 35 - Schema & documentation, 70 against 61 - Maintenance & community, 79 against 34 - Transparency & trust, 67 against 42 Watch for: No OpenAPI file was found. The machine-readable material is a Postman collection and Elasticsearch mappings ### Prospeo API + MCP (D) Good for: An agent that searches for prospects and then enriches them with verified emails and mobiles in one cheap loop. Ahead on: - Security & auth, 54 against 43 - Payments & pricing, 40 against 35 Also in its favour: - Runs on your own machine Watch for: No status page, SLA or changelog ## Score by category | Category | Weight | People Data Labs | Prospeo API + MCP | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 78 | 35 | People Data Labs +43 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 70 | 61 | People Data Labs +9 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 77 | 79 | Prospeo API + MCP +2 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 43 | 54 | Prospeo API + MCP +11 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 35 | 40 | Prospeo API + MCP +5 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 79 | 34 | People Data Labs +45 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 67 | 42 | People Data Labs +25 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **64.2 · B** | **50.9 · D** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | People Data Labs | Prospeo API + MCP | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | People Data Labs, Inc. | Prospeo | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.peopledatalabs.com/v5` | `https://api.prospeo.io` | | Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | | Auth | API key | OAuth or key | | Pricing | Freemium | Freemium | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Proprietary service under the Services Subscription Agreement. The Python and JavaScript SDKs are MIT | MIT | | Tools exposed | none | 8 | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | no | | MCP registry | not listed | `io.prospeo/prospeo-mcp-server` | | Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-06-01 | | Terms last updated | couldn't be read | couldn't be read | | Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | couldn't be read | | Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | couldn't be read | | Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | couldn't be read | | Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | couldn't be read | | Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | couldn't be read | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | couldn't be read | | Popularity | 40 stars, 133k npm/wk, 30k PyPI/wk | 0 stars, 641 npm/wk | | Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **People Data Labs.** Monthly dated release notes, a free sandbox with synthetic data, response headers that report credits and rate limits, and a free plan of 100 records a month make the API easy to start with. No OpenAPI file was found, keys carry no scopes and may travel in the URL, and the agreement allows changes without notice. **Prospeo API + MCP.** MCP tool descriptions say when to use each tool, its credit cost and the next call. No status page, SLA or changelog. ## Before you call either ### People Data Labs 1. Send the key in the `X-Api-Key` header. The `api_key` query parameter puts the secret in URLs and logs 2. Build and test queries against `https://sandbox.api.peopledatalabs.com/v5/...` first. It costs no credits and allows five calls a minute 3. Set `size` deliberately on search. Every record returned costs one credit, and responses over 1 MB fail 4. Treat `404` on enrichment as no match, not an error, and `402` as credits exhausted. Neither is worth a retry 5. On `429`, wait until the `x-ratelimit-reset` time. Limits are fixed-window per key and per endpoint ### Prospeo API + MCP 1. Call `search_suggestions` before using location, technology or industry filters, or the search returns nothing 2. Pass `person_id` values from search into `bulk_enrich_person`, 25 at a time 3. Branch on the body `error_code`, not the HTTP status, which is 400 for most failures 4. Set `enrich_mobile` only when needed. A mobile costs 10 credits against 1 for an email 5. Use Enrich Person. The old Email Finder endpoint was removed in March 2026 ## Questions ### Which is better for AI agents, People Data Labs or Prospeo API + MCP? People Data Labs scores 64.2 (B) on agent readiness against Prospeo API + MCP's 50.9 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Prospeo API + MCP leads on security & auth and payments & pricing. ### Do People Data Labs and Prospeo API + MCP need an API key? People Data Labs needs an API key. Prospeo API + MCP takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. ### Can an agent call People Data Labs and Prospeo API + MCP without installing anything? Yes. People Data Labs has a hosted endpoint at https://api.peopledatalabs.com/v5 and Prospeo API + MCP at https://api.prospeo.io. ## For agents - This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/people-data-labs-vs-prospeo.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/people-data-labs-vs-prospeo.min.md - Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "people-data-labs", "b": "prospeo"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare people-data-labs prospeo` - Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/people-data-labs.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/prospeo.json ## Other comparisons with People Data Labs or Prospeo API + MCP - [Apollo API + MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apollo-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [Apollo API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apollo-vs-prospeo.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-prospeo.md) - [Crustdata API + MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [Crustdata API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-prospeo.md) - [Enrich Layer API + MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/enrich-layer-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/enrich-layer-vs-prospeo.md) - [FullEnrich API + MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [FullEnrich API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-prospeo.md) - [Fuse MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fuse-mcp-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [Fuse MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fuse-mcp-vs-prospeo.md) - [Gojiberry vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gojiberry-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [Gojiberry vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gojiberry-vs-prospeo.md) - [Hunter API + MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hunter-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [LeadMagic API + MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/leadmagic-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [LeadMagic API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/leadmagic-vs-prospeo.md) - [Lusha API + MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lusha-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [Lusha API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lusha-vs-prospeo.md) - [People Data Labs vs ZoomInfo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/people-data-labs-vs-zoominfo.md) - [Prospeo API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prospeo-vs-zoominfo.md) - [Dropcontact API + MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [Dropcontact API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-prospeo.md) - [Hunter API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hunter-vs-prospeo.md)