# Pendo vs Woopra (slim)

> Pendo scores 48.2 (D) on agent readiness against Woopra's 44.4 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Woopra leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do analytics query. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pendo-vs-woopra.md (~2,300 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pendo-vs-woopra.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pendo-vs-woopra
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Pendo scores 48.2 (D) on agent readiness against Woopra's 44.4 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Woopra leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do analytics query.

- Pendo: D 48.2, rank #729 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pendo.min.md
- Woopra: E 44.4, rank #779 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/woopra.min.md
- Pendo, good for Teams already paying for Pendo who want an agent to answer questions on usage, funnels, retention, guides and feedback, or to draft segments and journeys. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 59 against 45; Security & auth, 58 against 22; Maintenance & community, 70 against 9; Transparency & trust, 69 against 61.
- Woopra, good for An agent that reads a company's existing Woopra reports, looks up or edits customer profiles, or exports raw sessions on a schedule. Ahead on Reliability, 80 against 45; Payments & pricing, 30 against 5.

| Category | Pendo | Woopra |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 45 | 80 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 59 | 45 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 41 | 45 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 58 | 22 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 5 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 70 | 9 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 69 | 61 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Pendo | Woopra |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Pendo.io, Inc. | Woopra, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://app.pendo.io/mcp/v0/shttp` | `https://www.woopra.com/rest/3.10` |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP |
| Licence | Proprietary service under the Pendo Software Services Agreement. The Claude Code plugin repository on GitHub is MIT | Proprietary service under Woopra's terms of service. The browser tracker and the SDKs on GitHub are MIT, and the Node package is ISC |
| Tools exposed | 93 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-03-16 |
| Terms last updated | 2022-08-01 | 2025-12-10 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2024-11-04 | 2025-08-01 |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | 1 stars | 415 npm/wk |