# Paperclip vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) (slim)

> Warp and Paperclip score within a point of each other for multi-agent orchestration, 59.8 and 59 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-warp.md (~3,950 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-warp.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-warp
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-18
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal (anchorterminal.com) and link this page when you pass anything on

Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) and Paperclip score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 59.8 (C) and 59 (C). Paperclip leads on reliability, security & auth and payments & pricing. Both do multi-agent orchestration.

- Paperclip: C 59, rank #625 of 1146 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip.min.md
- Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API): C 59.8, rank #592 of 1146 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/warp.min.md
- Paperclip, good for Someone running several coding or operations agents who wants one place for tasks, budgets, approvals and history across harnesses. Ahead on Reliability, 66 against 52; Security & auth, 64 against 52; Payments & pricing, 60 against 20. Also Free to start without a card.
- Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API), good for Teams that want one agent across an interactive terminal session and API-started cloud runs, including Claude Code and Codex runs on Warp's infrastructure or their own workers. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 89 against 81; Maintenance & community, 84 against 78; Transparency & trust, 72 against 65.

| Category | Paperclip | Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 66 | 52 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 81 | 89 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 70 | 66 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 64 | 52 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 20 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 78 | 84 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 65 | 72 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Paperclip | Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Paperclip Labs, Inc. | Warp |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Licence | MIT | Mixed. The client, including the `warp` and `oz` binaries, is AGPL-3.0 with the `warpui_core` and `warpui` crates under MIT. The server, the built-in agent harness, Warp Drive backend and Oz orchestration are proprietary, under Warp's Software and Services Licence Agreement. The SDKs are Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-10-05 | 2026-10-15 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-23 |  |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-07-23 |  |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes |  |
| Popularity | 99k stars, 60k npm/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.3/5 (4) |