{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "paperclip", "name": "Paperclip", "vendor": "Paperclip Labs, Inc.", "vendorUrl": "https://paperclip.ing", "kind": "harness", "category": "agent-harnesses", "summary": "Paperclip is an open-source, self-hosted server and web interface that organises AI agents into a company with an org chart, tasks, budgets and approvals. It drives Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw and other harnesses through adapters.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/paperclip.json", "dns": "paperclip.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip", "license": "MIT", "transports": [], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "paperclipai" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@paperclipai/mcp-server" }, { "registry": "oci", "name": "ghcr.io/paperclipai/paperclip" } ], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "No Paperclip account. The default `local_trusted` mode needs no login on loopback. Authenticated mode uses browser sessions for people, board API keys for scripts, and agent API keys or short-lived run JWTs as bearer tokens.", "pricing": "free", "pricingNotes": "Free and MIT, self-hosted, with nothing to buy. The owner pays each harness's model provider or subscription. Paperclip Cloud is a waitlist with no published price.", "priceSummary": "Free · OSS", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the docs, the site or the server source (checked 2026-10-08). The only mention in the repository is a link to a third-party skill in a planning note.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": 98666, "npmWeekly": 59684, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-10-08" }, "docsUrl": "https://docs.paperclip.ing", "llmsTxt": "https://paperclip.ing/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "agent.multi-agent", "agent.mcp-client" ], "tags": [ "open-source", "self-hosted", "local", "free", "no-card", "llms-txt", "docker", "mcp", "typescript" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-23", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 52.6, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 982, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1510, "categoryRank": 39, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 78, "payments": 60, "reliability": 59, "schema": 81, "security": 64, "transparency": 66 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-04" }, "negative": -15, "negativeNotes": [ "Advisories counted one by one, at this run's values (a fixed Critical or High over two months old 1, a fixed Moderate the vendor published 1, an unfixed High 2). OSV holds eleven Paperclip advisories, all published 10 to 16 April 2026. Four fixed Criticals, among them GHSA-68qg-g8mg-6pr7 (CVE-2026-41679, unauthenticated remote code execution through an import authorisation bypass, fixed 2026.410.0) and the cross-tenant key flaws GHSA-3xx2-mqjm-hg9x and GHSA-47wq-cj9q-wpmp, -4. Three fixed Highs (GHSA-265w-rf2w-cjh4, GHSA-w8hx-hqjv-vjcq, GHSA-xfqj-r5qw-8g4j), -3. Three fixed Moderates (GHSA-3pw3-v88x-xj24, GHSA-p7mm-r948-4q3q and GHSA-fpw4-p57j-hqmq, a stored XSS in the UI's Markdown links), -3. https://api.osv.dev/v1/query", "2026-04-16. GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf (High), a `codex_local` agent inherited a Gmail connector from the owner's ChatGPT account and sent real email. OSV lists no fixed version, and `codex_local` still defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, so it counts as unfixed, -2. https://api.osv.dev/v1/vulns/GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf", "2026-07-22. GHSA-x8hx-rhr2-9rf7 (9.6), drive-by remote code execution against the default `local_trusted` mode through DNS rebinding. Per the 8 October check the advisory names no patched version and the source applies the hostname guard to `local_trusted` private deployments, read as fixed, over two months old, -1. It is not in OSV. https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/security/advisories/GHSA-x8hx-rhr2-9rf7", "2026-10-24. Commit 5db57347 (#17435) fixes plugin diagnostics routes that let a board member of one company read another company's plugin log messages, job run errors and webhook delivery errors. It is on master and in canary builds only, in no stable release (2026.1023.0 was promoted from a beta tagged on 11 October), with no advisory, -3. https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/17435", "-4 -3 -3 -2 -1 -3 = -16, held at the -15 floor." ], "verdict": "Board approvals, budgets with a hard stop and an activity log sit above whichever harnesses do the work, with ten stable versions in 90 days. The Claude Code and Codex adapters skip permission prompts and the sandbox by default, twelve security advisories have appeared since April 2026, and a 24 October cross-company read fix is in no stable release.", "bestFor": "Someone running several coding or operations agents who wants one place for tasks, budgets, approvals and history across harnesses.", "strengths": [ "One deployment runs agents on Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Pi, Hermes, Grok Build, Kimi Code and OpenClaw through adapters, under one org chart", "Board approvals gate agent hires and the CEO agent's strategy, and connection actions can be set to Allowed, Ask first or Off", "Budgets by company, agent and project pause an agent at 100 per cent of recorded spend", "The running server publishes its REST surface as OpenAPI at `/api/openapi.json`, and the docs site answers every page as Markdown at `.md`", "Ten stable releases between 17 August and 23 October 2026, each with dated notes, a Breaking Changes section and an upgrade guide" ], "weaknesses": [ "`claude_local` defaults `dangerouslySkipPermissions` to true and `codex_local` defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, with agents running on the host", "Twelve published security advisories since April 2026, five critical, including CVE-2026-41679 (unauthenticated remote code execution, fixed in 2026.410.0)", "Anonymous usage telemetry is on by default and goes to telemetry.paperclip.ing until an opt-out is set", "2,849 open issues on 8 October 2026, 1,396 of them with no comment, and 78 closed in 30 days against 686 opened", "Calendar versions with no 1.0, and release 2026.916.0 carried five breaking changes" ], "agentNotes": [ "Set `PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1` or `DO_NOT_TRACK=1` before the first start. Telemetry is on by default", "Set `dangerouslySkipPermissions` and `dangerouslyBypassApprovalsAndSandbox` to false on agents that read untrusted input, or run them in a sandbox provider", "Install with Node.js 24.11 or newer, and install and sign in to each harness CLI on the host first. Paperclip assumes they are there", "Use `--bind lan` or `--bind tailnet` at onboarding for anything beyond one machine. The default `local_trusted` mode treats every request as the board admin", "Treat 409 on task checkout as owned by another agent and pick different work. The API docs say not to retry" ], "metrics": { "kind": "local", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 52.6 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 78, "payments": 60, "reliability": 59, "schema": 81, "security": 64, "transparency": 73 }, "provenanceScore": 58, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-04", "maintenance": "2026-11-04", "payments": "2026-11-04", "reliability": "2026-11-04", "schema": "2026-11-04", "security": "2026-11-04", "transparency": "2026-11-04" }, "last": "2026-11-04", "lastMoved": "2026-11-04", "oldest": "2026-11-04", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "npx paperclipai@latest onboard --yes # Node.js 24.11 or newer", "http": "curl http://localhost:3100/api/health", "headless": { "command": "npx paperclipai issue create --title \"$TASK\" --json", "env": { "PAPERCLIP_API_KEY": "\u003cboard or agent key\u003e", "PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED": "1" } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/agent.multi-agent", "tool": "https://letme.dev/paperclip" }, "area": "frameworks", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Paperclip Labs, Inc.", "domain": "paperclip.ing", "domainRegistered": "2026-03-02", "endpointOnVendorDomain": null, "terms": "https://paperclip.ing/terms/", "privacy": "https://paperclip.ing/privacy/", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-10-08", "notes": [ "The terms (effective 1 April 2026, updated 23 July 2026) and the privacy policy (effective 23 July 2026) name Paperclip Labs, Inc. and Delaware law. The licence file in the repository reads Copyright (c) 2025 Paperclip AI.", "RDAP at the .ing registry gives a registration date of 2026-03-02 for paperclip.ing, with Cloudflare as registrar. The GitHub repository was created the same day.", "paperclip.ing/.well-known/security.txt and docs.paperclip.ing/.well-known/security.txt returned 404 on 8 October 2026. SECURITY.md sends reports to GitHub private advisories.", "The software is self-hosted, so there is no vendor endpoint or status page to check. status.paperclip.ing did not answer.", "The privacy policy says it governs the hosted services, and that a self-hosted deployment processes data on the owner's infrastructure." ], "score": 58 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip.json", "live": { "slug": "paperclip", "versions": [ { "registry": "github", "name": "paperclipai/paperclip", "version": "v2026.1106.0", "released": "2026-11-06", "seenAt": "2026-11-06T23:54:27.395759821Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@paperclipai/mcp-server", "version": "2026.1106.0", "seenAt": "2026-11-06T23:54:25.875367104Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "paperclipai", "version": "2026.1106.0", "seenAt": "2026-11-06T23:54:25.202880061Z" } ], "githubStars": 111739, "npmWeekly": 55631, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T16:01:01.774301174Z" }, "llmsTxt": { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/llms.txt", "ok": true, "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T15:33:34.992030626Z" }, "domain": { "domain": "paperclip.ing", "registered": "2026-03-02", "source": "https://pubapi.registry.google/rdap/domain/paperclip.ing", "checkedAt": "2026-11-01T14:22:49.390462839Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/", "kind": "changelog", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:15:55.15829297Z", "changedAt": "2026-10-24T02:22:26.710785766Z", "fingerprint": "a227bbb641b7" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/v2026.1001.0/", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:15:57.262424846Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "f4181b1b6b88" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/v2026.1005.0/", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:15:59.373178947Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "802a09c9725b" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/v2026.1012.0/", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:16:01.420841708Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "0afbb1fc6f29" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/v2026.1023.0/", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:16:03.413299546Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "9a8de031b163" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/v2026.916.0/", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:16:05.190283004Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "1e69b918c7c5" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/privacy/", "kind": "privacy", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:16:07.376360782Z", "changedAt": "2026-10-24T02:22:28.926605099Z", "fingerprint": "0f001aba3049" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/terms/", "kind": "terms", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:16:09.360818389Z", "changedAt": "2026-10-24T02:22:30.943098177Z", "fingerprint": "42aee815daee" } ], "github": { "repo": "paperclipai/paperclip", "checkedAt": "2026-11-02T09:14:52.889851537Z", "stars": 110038, "archived": false, "issuesEnabled": true, "pushedAt": "2026-11-02T06:27:13Z", "openIssues": 3464, "openPRs": 3161, "issuesOpened90d": 1860, "issuesClosed90d": 461, "prsMerged90d": 2751, "ci": { "branch": "master", "runs": 50, "success": 43, "failure": 4, "other": 3, "latest": "success", "latestAt": "2026-11-02T06:27:47Z" }, "advisories": [ { "ghsa": "GHSA-x8hx-rhr2-9rf7", "severity": "critical", "published": "2026-07-22T23:12:15Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-3xx2-mqjm-hg9x", "severity": "critical", "published": "2026-04-16T12:24:49Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-fpw4-p57j-hqmq", "severity": "medium", "published": "2026-04-16T12:24:23Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-p7mm-r948-4q3q", "severity": "medium", "published": "2026-04-16T12:24:03Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-47wq-cj9q-wpmp", "severity": "critical", "published": "2026-04-16T12:23:29Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-vr7g-88fq-vhq3", "severity": "critical", "published": "2026-04-16T12:21:04Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf", "severity": "high", "published": "2026-04-16T12:19:12Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-xfqj-r5qw-8g4j", "severity": "high", "published": "2026-04-16T12:16:47Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-w8hx-hqjv-vjcq", "severity": "high", "published": "2026-04-16T12:16:15Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-265w-rf2w-cjh4", "cve": "CVE-2026-41208", "severity": "high", "published": "2026-04-16T12:15:14Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-3pw3-v88x-xj24", "severity": "medium", "published": "2026-04-16T12:14:14Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-68qg-g8mg-6pr7", "cve": "CVE-2026-41679", "severity": "critical", "published": "2026-04-10T16:50:27Z" } ] }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-07T16:01:01.774301174Z" } }, "answer": "Paperclip scores 52.6 (D) on agent readiness against Verdent's 39.7 (E), and leads in every scored category.", "b": { "slug": "verdent", "name": "Verdent", "vendor": "Verdent AI, Inc.", "vendorUrl": "https://www.verdent.ai", "kind": "harness", "category": "agent-harnesses", "summary": "Verdent is a coding agent from Verdent AI, Inc., with a desktop app for macOS and Windows, VS Code and JetBrains extensions and a browser edition. It plans tasks, runs parallel workers in git worktrees and uses MCP servers.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/verdent", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/verdent.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/verdent.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/verdent.json", "dns": "verdent.grade.anchorterminal.com", "license": "Proprietary. The terms of use from Verdent AI, Inc. forbid reverse engineering or copying any component, and no source is published", "transports": [], "packages": [], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "A person signs in to a Verdent account with Google, GitHub or email in a browser. Model use runs on Verdent credits through llm-proxy.verdent.ai, or on the user's own Anthropic, OpenAI or OpenRouter key (BYOK). BYOA runs workers on a local Claude Code or Codex CLI with keys kept on the machine. No API key or token for driving Verdent from another program was found.", "pricing": "paid", "pricingNotes": "From $5 a month (Lite), then $19 Starter, $59 Pro and $179 Max with 320, 1,000 and 3,000 credits a month (doubled by a limited-time bonus). One credit is about $0.059 at provider rates. Top-ups $20 for 340 credits to $200 for 3,400. Free Mode and the free trial ended with v2.18.0 on 29 October 2026.", "priceSummary": "$5 / mo", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the docs, pricing page, terms or changelog (checked 2026-11-06). Subscriptions and top-ups go through Stripe.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-06" }, "docsUrl": "https://www.verdent.ai/docs/verdent-manager/getting-started/overview", "capabilities": [ "agent.harness", "agent.multi-agent", "agent.mcp-client" ], "tags": [ "official", "harness", "coding-agent", "closed-source", "desktop", "vscode", "jetbrains", "mcp", "byok", "paid-plans", "no-sandbox" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-29", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 39.7, "grade": "E", "agentReady": false, "rank": 1336, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1510, "categoryRank": 53, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 35, "maintenance": 61, "payments": 20, "reliability": 43, "schema": 55, "security": 33, "transparency": 55 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-06" }, "negative": -2, "negativeNotes": [ "2026-11-06. The changelog says v2.18.0 of 29 October 2026 retired Free Mode, the free trial and the 100 welcome credits, while the pricing page FAQ read on 6 November still says \"Your free trial includes 100 credits\" and the 1.0 docs overview still lists a free trial. A stale claim on the vendor's own pricing page, 2 points. https://www.verdent.ai/pricing, https://www.verdent.ai/changelog" ], "verdict": "A desktop and editor coding agent that splits a goal into parallel workers in git worktrees, with a read-only Plan Mode, MCP servers and the option to run workers on Claude Code or Codex. It has no CLI, API or sandbox, sends context through Verdent's servers, and has had no free tier since 29 October 2026.", "bestFor": "A person who wants a desktop app to plan and run several coding tasks at once, possibly on their own Claude Code or Codex.", "strengths": [ "Plan Mode is read-only and writes a plan.md for review before Agent Mode makes changes", "Parallel workers each run in their own git worktree, with a review column before work is accepted", "BYOA runs workers on a local Claude Code or Codex CLI, and BYOK takes Anthropic, OpenAI or OpenRouter keys", "Plan, top-up and per-credit prices are public, charged at provider token rates with no markup per the pricing page", "Every current docs page has a Markdown twin, and the changelog is dated by version" ], "weaknesses": [ "No CLI, print mode, API or SDK, so a pipeline can't start or read a run except through a paired chat bot", "No sandbox or network restriction documented, and the actions that need approval aren't listed", "Free Mode and the free trial ended on 29 October 2026, while the pricing page FAQ still promises 100 trial credits", "Event logging to log.verdent.ai has no documented opt-out, and the privacy policy gives no retention periods", "SOC 2 and ISO/IEC 42001 are being pursued, not held, and there is no bug bounty or security.txt" ], "agentNotes": [ "Don't plan to drive Verdent headless. Hand the task to the person using the desktop app, or use a harness with a print mode", "Start large changes in Plan Mode and review plan.md before switching to Agent Mode", "Add MCP servers in the project's .mcp.json or ~/.verdent/mcp.json in the mcpServers shape", "Keep work under git, since rollback relies on git and there is no sandbox", "Budget in credits at about $0.059 each, because there is no free allowance since 29 October 2026" ], "metrics": { "kind": "local", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "E", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 39.7 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 35, "maintenance": 61, "payments": 20, "reliability": 43, "schema": 55, "security": 33, "transparency": 47 }, "provenanceScore": 62, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-06", "maintenance": "2026-11-06", "payments": "2026-11-06", "reliability": "2026-11-06", "schema": "2026-11-06", "security": "2026-11-06", "transparency": "2026-11-06" }, "last": "2026-11-06", "oldest": "2026-11-06", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "config": { "mcpServers": { "github": { "args": [ "-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github" ], "command": "npx", "env": { "GITHUB_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN": "${GITHUB_TOKEN}" } } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/agent.harness", "tool": "https://letme.dev/verdent" }, "area": "frameworks", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Lite plan", "unit": "month", "usd": 5, "note": "Eco Mode models and light usage" }, { "item": "Starter plan", "unit": "month", "usd": 19, "note": "320 credits a month, 480 with the limited-time bonus" }, { "item": "Pro plan", "unit": "month", "usd": 59, "note": "1,000 credits a month, 1,500 with the bonus" }, { "item": "Max plan", "unit": "month", "usd": 179, "note": "3,000 credits a month, 4,500 with the bonus" }, { "item": "Credit", "unit": "credit", "usd": 0.059, "note": "About $0.059, charged at provider token prices with no markup per the pricing page" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Verdent AI, Inc.", "domain": "verdent.ai", "domainRegistered": "2025-05-06", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.verdent.ai/terms", "privacy": "https://www.verdent.ai/privacy", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://www.verdent.ai/changelog", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-11-06", "notes": [ "The privacy policy names Verdent AI, Inc. as data controller, and the terms choose California law.", "The terms forbid users to crawl, scrape or otherwise harvest data or information from the Services. Public pages were read once each.", "www.verdent.ai/robots.txt allows all crawlers.", "RDAP gives verdent.ai a registration date of 6 May 2025.", "/.well-known/security.txt returns 404, and status.verdent.ai did not answer. No status page found.", "The security page says SOC 2 and ISO/IEC 42001 are being pursued, not held, and takes vulnerability reports at hi@verdent.ai with acknowledgement within five business days." ], "score": 62 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/verdent.json", "live": { "slug": "verdent", "securityTxt": { "url": "https://verdent.ai/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T15:59:33.272105482Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://www.verdent.ai/changelog", "kind": "changelog", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:36:28.662063151Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "bac05e4e426e" }, { "url": "https://www.verdent.ai/privacy", "kind": "privacy", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:36:31.354667853Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "3ec1d3c07d70" }, { "url": "https://www.verdent.ai/terms", "kind": "terms", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:36:33.295376926Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "206b6ec23a6a" } ], "updatedAt": "2026-11-07T15:59:33.272105482Z" } }, "edges": [ { "by": 40, "category": "payments", "leads": "paperclip", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "reasons": { "a": "No payment protocol (0). Read with the self-hosted rule. The software is free under MIT with nothing to buy (20). No card and no Paperclip account (20). One `npx` command installs and starts it with no signup (20). Paperclip Cloud is a waitlist with no published price, so there is no paid option to score.", "b": "Harness reading of the published rubric, scored on the Verdent subscription the agent needs. No payment protocol (0). Plan prices from $5 a month, top-up prices and the credit value of about $0.059 are public without a login (20). Free Mode and the free trial ended on 29 October 2026, so there is no free tier (0). A person signs up in a browser (0). 0+20+0+0 = 20." }, "scores": { "a": 60, "b": 20 } }, { "by": 35, "category": "ergonomics", "leads": "paperclip", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "reasons": { "a": "Harness reading of the framework line, scored on what an agent or pipeline driving it has to supply. The MCP server lists 44 tools with no toolsets or read-only subset found, offset by compact reads such as `paperclipInboxLite` and the heartbeat context (12). Budgets by company, agent and project with an automatic pause at 100 per cent, though the README says enforcement uses recorded spend and can lag work in flight (16). `onboard --yes`, CLI commands with `--json`, the REST API and routines started by cron, webhook or API (16). Atomic task checkout with a documented 409, `Idempotency-Key` on routine triggers, saved sessions and bounded recovery (17). One command starts a server with embedded PostgreSQL, but it needs Node.js 24.11 and each harness CLI installed and signed in on the host, and we found no client SDK beyond the TypeScript plugin SDK (9).", "b": "Harness reading. MCP servers per project or globally, subagents, skills and rules, but no per-tool disabling or deferred loading found (10). No output-size, turn-limit or budget controls for a run were found beyond credit balances (5). No exit codes or error format, since there is no headless mode (3). Parallel workers in git worktrees and a review column make runs reviewable and reversible, with no resume by ID documented (10). No CLI, API or SDK. A pipeline can only reach Manager through a paired Telegram, Slack or Feishu bot (7). 10+5+3+10+7 = 35." }, "scores": { "a": 70, "b": 35 } }, { "by": 31, "category": "security", "leads": "paperclip", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "reasons": { "a": "Harness reading of the framework checklist, as used for the other harnesses. 30 for what leaves the machine by default, 20 for approvals and sandboxing, 15 for prompt-injection posture, 15 for audit and 20 for the security programme. Anonymous usage telemetry is on by default and goes to telemetry.paperclip.ing. The README lists what is excluded and four opt-outs, and Sentry and OpenTelemetry stay off until configured. We found no first-run notice in the CLI source (18). Board approvals for hires and strategy, execution policies and per-action connection permissions, but `claude_local` defaults `dangerouslySkipPermissions` to true, `codex_local` defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, local agents run on the host, sandbox providers are optional plugins and the default `local_trusted` mode has no login (10). A documented `low_trust_review` preset contains agents that read untrusted pull requests or tickets. It is opt-in (10). An activity log of mutating actions, run logs, cost events and audited board API keys (14). SECURITY.md with GitHub private reporting and twelve advisories published per the 8 October check, three now with CVEs in OSV. No security.txt, bug bounty or SOC 2 report found (12).", "b": "Framework reading (telemetry defaults, approvals, guardrails, sandboxing). Conversation history and tool results go to Verdent's US servers and on to Azure, Bedrock or Vertex, with zero data retention stated for Vertex and Bedrock only. Event logging to log.verdent.ai has no documented opt-out. BYOA keys stay on the machine (10). Plan Mode is read-only, Agent Mode asks before destructive commands and edits outside scope, and workers are isolated by git worktree, but there is no sandbox or network control and the approval list isn't enumerated (9). No prompt-injection guidance found, while web search and fetch results enter the context (2). Usage history in the dashboard, no audit log found (5). A security page with a disclosure address and a five-day acknowledgement, SOC 2 and ISO/IEC 42001 being pursued rather than held, no security.txt and no bug bounty (7). 10+9+2+5+7 = 33." }, "scores": { "a": 64, "b": 33 } }, { "by": 26, "category": "schema", "leads": "paperclip", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "reasons": { "a": "The running server publishes OpenAPI at `/api/openapi.json` and validates requests with Zod, and the MCP server's tools take Zod schemas. No copy of the spec is published on the docs site, and paperclip.ing/openapi.json describes only the website (22). llms.txt at paperclip.ing, and docs pages answer as Markdown at `.md` (10). An API reference page per resource and task guides, but the MCP tool descriptions are one line each, such as List agents in a company (13). Typed inputs throughout, apart from the `paperclipApiRequest` tool, which takes any path under `/api` and a JSON body (12). cURL, JavaScript and Python examples and a status-code table, with one `{error}` shape and an occasional `details` field (12). A changelog page for every stable release and release notes in the repository, but the API path carries no version (12).", "b": "Framework reading for a harness. No schema for settings or output, only mcp.json examples in the standard mcpServers shape (5). Every current docs page has a Markdown twin at the same path with .md, though no llms.txt (10). The docs say when to use Agent Mode or Plan Mode and what Plan Mode can't do, but the Agent Mode page lists the actions that need approval only as \"certain tool executions\" and \"destructive operations\" (12). Modes and BYOA agent types are enumerated, permissions are not (5). Examples on the MCP, BYOA and messaging pages, and a recovery page, with no error codes (8). Version numbers and a dated public changelog (15). The archived 1.0 docs are still served beside the current ones. 5+10+12+5+8+15 = 55." }, "scores": { "a": 81, "b": 55 } }, { "by": 17, "category": "maintenance", "leads": "paperclip", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "reasons": { "a": "Version 2026.1023.0, released on 23 October 2026 per its notes and the site banner (30). Ten stable releases from 2026.817.0 (17 August) to 2026.1023.0 in the 90 days to 4 November (20). Per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November, 650 pull requests merged in the last 30 days, but 2,849 issues and 3,338 pull requests were open, 1,396 open issues had no comment, and 309 of the 472 still-open issues from the two weeks before had none (8). `paperclipai` and `@paperclipai/mcp-server` publish from the same release workflow. We did not check the MCP registry (12). CI on master, a lockfile refresh workflow and signed image attestations (8). 30 + 20 + 8 + 12 + 8 = 78.", "b": "Closed service. v2.18.0 on 29 October 2026, eight days before this check (30). More than three dated releases in the 90 days from 8 August, among them 2.10.0 to 2.18.0 (20). A dated public changelog, a support address, Discord and a subreddit, with no public tracker to read reply times (8). No official SDK or MCP server to keep current (0). No public packages or CI to judge (3). 30+20+8+0+3 = 61." }, "scores": { "a": 78, "b": 61 } }, { "by": 16, "category": "reliability", "leads": "paperclip", "name": "Reliability", "reasons": { "a": "Read as local software. Official npm package `paperclipai` (Node.js 24.11 or newer) and a Docker image on GHCR (20). Public CI that runs the tests (pr-trusted.yml selects and runs the test shards, and e2e.yml runs the end-to-end suite), with the pass state on master unreadable on 4 November 2026 because GitHub's pages answer 403 here (15). Per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November, 2,849 open issues, 125 labelled bug, 1,599 opened before 8 July, and 78 closed in the last 30 days against 686 opened (6). Calendar versions in semver syntax, with a Breaking Changes section and an upgrade guide in release notes, but breaking changes arrive in ordinary releases and 2026.916.0 carried five (10). No 1.0. The npm `latest` tag is called the stable channel and follows a beta soak of at least three days, while the roadmap says the product is still moving quickly, so half credit (8). 20 + 15 + 6 + 10 + 8 = 59.", "b": "Local-package reading, as for the other closed-source harnesses. The desktop app installs from verdent.ai with macOS 11 or later and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11 stated, and the extension from the editor marketplaces, but not from a package registry (15). No public CI or test suite, since the source isn't published (0). No public issue tracker, every task runs through Verdent's servers, and no status page was found, so there is no readable record (5). A dated changelog by version, with the end of Free Mode called out in v2.18.0, but no breaking-change sections (8). 2.18.0, generally available (15). 15+0+5+8+15 = 43." }, "scores": { "a": 59, "b": 43 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "Agent harness", "b": "Agent harness", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "Paperclip Labs, Inc.", "b": "Verdent AI, Inc.", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "OAuth or key", "b": "OAuth or key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Free", "b": "Paid", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "MIT", "b": "Proprietary. The terms of use from Verdent AI, Inc. forbid reverse engineering or copying any component, and no source is published", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "no", "b": "yes", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "no", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-10-23", "b": "2026-10-29", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "2026-07-23", "b": "2026-05-25", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "2026-07-23", "b": "2026-05-26", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "yes, with an opt-out", "b": "yes", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "yes", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "yes", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "99k stars, 60k npm/wk", "b": "none", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Paperclip scores 52.6 (D) on agent readiness against Verdent's 39.7 (E), and leads in every scored category.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Paperclip or Verdent?" }, { "answer": "Paperclip is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Verdent.", "question": "Are Paperclip and Verdent open source?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 59 against 43", "Schema \u0026 documentation, 81 against 55", "Agent ergonomics, 70 against 35", "Security \u0026 auth, 64 against 33", "Payments \u0026 pricing, 60 against 20", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 78 against 61", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 66 against 55" ], "also": [ "Free to start without a card", "Open source" ], "goodFor": "Someone running several coding or operations agents who wants one place for tasks, budgets, approvals and history across harnesses.", "slug": "paperclip", "watchFor": "`claude_local` defaults `dangerouslySkipPermissions` to true and `codex_local` defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, with agents running on the host" }, { "aheadOn": null, "also": null, "goodFor": "A person who wants a desktop app to plan and run several coding tasks at once, possibly on their own Claude Code or Codex.", "slug": "verdent", "watchFor": "No CLI, print mode, API or SDK, so a pipeline can't start or read a run except through a paired chat bot" } ], "history": { "paperclip": [ { "causes": [ "correction" ], "date": "2026-11-04", "delta": -6.4, "from": 59, "fromGrade": "C", "to": 52.6, "toGrade": "D" }, { "causes": [ "method" ], "date": "2026-10-27", "delta": 0, "from": 59, "fromGrade": "C", "to": 59, "toGrade": "C" } ], "verdent": null }, "job": { "capability": "agent.multi-agent", "name": "Multi-agent orchestration" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agent-zero-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Agent Zero vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agent-zero-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aider-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Aider vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aider-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Amp vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Antigravity CLI vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auggie-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Auggie CLI vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auggie-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axlr-vs-verdent.json", "title": "AXLR vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axlr-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Claude Code vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cline-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Cline vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cline-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/conductor-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Conductor vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/conductor-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Crush vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cursor-cli-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Cursor CLI vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cursor-cli-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-verdent.json", "title": "DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-superagent-vs-verdent.json", "title": "dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-superagent-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devin-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Devin vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devin-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/droid-cli-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Droid CLI vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/droid-cli-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/earendil-pi-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Pi vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/earendil-pi-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Emdash vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-cli-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Gemini CLI vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-cli-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/github-copilot-cli-vs-verdent.json", "title": "GitHub Copilot CLI vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/github-copilot-cli-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/goose-vs-verdent.json", "title": "goose vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/goose-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness2-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Harness² vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness2-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harnessrouter-vs-verdent.json", "title": "HarnessRouter vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harnessrouter-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jules-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Jules vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jules-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/junie-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Junie CLI vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/junie-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kilo-code-cli-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Kilo Code CLI vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kilo-code-cli-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kimi-code-cli-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Kimi Code CLI vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kimi-code-cli-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kiro-cli-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Kiro CLI vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kiro-cli-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/letta-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Letta vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/letta-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mini-swe-agent-vs-verdent.json", "title": "mini-swe-agent vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mini-swe-agent-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minimax-code-vs-verdent.json", "title": "MiniMax Code vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minimax-code-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-vibe-cli-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Mistral Vibe CLI vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-vibe-cli-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-code-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Muse Code vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-code-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-agents-api-vs-verdent.json", "title": "OpenAI Agents API vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-agents-api-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-codex-vs-verdent.json", "title": "OpenAI Codex vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-codex-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencode-vs-verdent.json", "title": "OpenCode vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencode-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openhands-vs-verdent.json", "title": "OpenHands vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openhands-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/orca-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Orca vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/orca-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paseo-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Paseo vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paseo-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prime-agent-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Prime Agent vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prime-agent-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qoder-cli-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Qoder CLI vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qoder-cli-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen-code-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Qwen Code vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen-code-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-mirror-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Mirror CLI vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-mirror-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/rovo-dev-cli-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Rovo Dev CLI vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/rovo-dev-cli-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/sculptor-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Sculptor vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/sculptor-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/t3-code-vs-verdent.json", "title": "T3 Code vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/t3-code-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/traycer-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Traycer vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/traycer-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/verdent-vs-vibe-trading.json", "title": "Verdent vs Vibe-Trading", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/verdent-vs-vibe-trading" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/verdent-vs-warp.json", "title": "Verdent vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/verdent-vs-warp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Amp vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Antigravity CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auggie-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Auggie CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auggie-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axlr-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "AXLR vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axlr-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Claude Code vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "CLI Manager vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-verdent.json", "title": "CLI Manager vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cline-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Cline vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cline-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/conductor-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Conductor vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/conductor-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Crush vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-superagent-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-superagent-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devin-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Devin vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devin-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/droid-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Droid CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/droid-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Emdash vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Gemini CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/github-copilot-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "GitHub Copilot CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/github-copilot-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/goose-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "goose vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/goose-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-autonomous-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Harness vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-autonomous-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-autonomous-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Harness vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-autonomous-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harnessrouter-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "HarnessRouter vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harnessrouter-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jules-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Jules vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jules-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/junie-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Junie CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/junie-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kilo-code-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Kilo Code CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kilo-code-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kimi-code-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Kimi Code CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kimi-code-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kiro-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Kiro CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kiro-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/letta-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Letta vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/letta-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minimax-code-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "MiniMax Code vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minimax-code-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-vibe-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Mistral Vibe CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-vibe-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-code-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Muse Code vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-code-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencode-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "OpenCode vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencode-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openhands-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "OpenHands vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openhands-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openmausbot-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "OpenMausBot vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openmausbot-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openmausbot-vs-verdent.json", "title": "OpenMausBot vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openmausbot-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/orca-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Orca vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/orca-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-parallax-agents.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Parallax", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-parallax-agents" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-paseo.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Paseo", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-paseo" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-prime-agent.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Prime Agent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-prime-agent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qoder-cli.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Qoder CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qoder-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qwen-code.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Qwen Code", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qwen-code" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-reflection-mirror.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Mirror CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-reflection-mirror" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-rovo-dev-cli.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Rovo Dev CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-rovo-dev-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-sculptor.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Sculptor", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-sculptor" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-t3-code.json", "title": "Paperclip vs T3 Code", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-t3-code" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-traycer.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Traycer", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-traycer" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-unstoppable.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Unstoppable", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-unstoppable" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-vibe-trading.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Vibe-Trading", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-vibe-trading" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-warp.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-warp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/parallax-agents-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Parallax vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/parallax-agents-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/unstoppable-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Unstoppable vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/unstoppable-vs-verdent" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "by": 16, "edge": "paperclip", "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "paperclip": 59, "verdent": 43, "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 26, "edge": "paperclip", "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "paperclip": 81, "verdent": 55, "weight": 13 }, { "by": 35, "edge": "paperclip", "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "paperclip": 70, "verdent": 35, "weight": 13 }, { "by": 31, "edge": "paperclip", "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "paperclip": 64, "verdent": 33, "weight": 14 }, { "by": 40, "edge": "paperclip", "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "paperclip": 60, "verdent": 20, "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 17, "edge": "paperclip", "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "paperclip": 78, "verdent": 61, "weight": 7 }, { "by": 11, "edge": "paperclip", "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "paperclip": 66, "verdent": 55, "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "Paperclip scores 52.6 (D) on agent readiness against Verdent's 39.7 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do multi-agent orchestration.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "paperclip": "Board approvals, budgets with a hard stop and an activity log sit above whichever harnesses do the work, with ten stable versions in 90 days. The Claude Code and Codex adapters skip permission prompts and the sandbox by default, twelve security advisories have appeared since April 2026, and a 24 October cross-company read fix is in no stable release.", "verdent": "A desktop and editor coding agent that splits a goal into parallel workers in git worktrees, with a read-only Plan Mode, MCP servers and the option to run workers on Claude Code or Codex. It has no CLI, API or sandbox, sends context through Verdent's servers, and has had no free tier since 29 October 2026." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-verdent", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-verdent.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-verdent.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-verdent.min.md" }, "markdown": "Paperclip scores 52.6 (D) on agent readiness against Verdent's 39.7 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do multi-agent orchestration.\n\n- Paperclip: grade D, 52.6/100, rank #982 of 1510. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/paperclip.json\n- Verdent: grade E, 39.7/100, rank #1336 of 1510. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/verdent.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/verdent.json\n- Best agent harnesses and coding agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/agent-harnesses/index.md\n- All 1500 harnesses comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agent-harnesses/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Paperclip (D)\n\nGood for: Someone running several coding or operations agents who wants one place for tasks, budgets, approvals and history across harnesses.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 59 against 43\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 81 against 55\n- Agent ergonomics, 70 against 35\n- Security \u0026 auth, 64 against 33\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 60 against 20\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 78 against 61\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 66 against 55\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- Free to start without a card\n- Open source\n\nWatch for: `claude_local` defaults `dangerouslySkipPermissions` to true and `codex_local` defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, with agents running on the host\n\n### Verdent (E)\n\nGood for: A person who wants a desktop app to plan and run several coding tasks at once, possibly on their own Claude Code or Codex.\n\nWatch for: No CLI, print mode, API or SDK, so a pipeline can't start or read a run except through a paired chat bot\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Payments \u0026 pricing: Paperclip +40\n\n- Paperclip (60): No payment protocol (0). Read with the self-hosted rule. The software is free under MIT with nothing to buy (20). No card and no Paperclip account (20). One `npx` command installs and starts it with no signup (20). Paperclip Cloud is a waitlist with no published price, so there is no paid option to score.\n- Verdent (20): Harness reading of the published rubric, scored on the Verdent subscription the agent needs. No payment protocol (0). Plan prices from $5 a month, top-up prices and the credit value of about $0.059 are public without a login (20). Free Mode and the free trial ended on 29 October 2026, so there is no free tier (0). A person signs up in a browser (0). 0+20+0+0 = 20.\n\n### Agent ergonomics: Paperclip +35\n\n- Paperclip (70): Harness reading of the framework line, scored on what an agent or pipeline driving it has to supply. The MCP server lists 44 tools with no toolsets or read-only subset found, offset by compact reads such as `paperclipInboxLite` and the heartbeat context (12). Budgets by company, agent and project with an automatic pause at 100 per cent, though the README says enforcement uses recorded spend and can lag work in flight (16). `onboard --yes`, CLI commands with `--json`, the REST API and routines started by cron, webhook or API (16). Atomic task checkout with a documented 409, `Idempotency-Key` on routine triggers, saved sessions and bounded recovery (17). One command starts a server with embedded PostgreSQL, but it needs Node.js 24.11 and each harness CLI installed and signed in on the host, and we found no client SDK beyond the TypeScript plugin SDK (9).\n- Verdent (35): Harness reading. MCP servers per project or globally, subagents, skills and rules, but no per-tool disabling or deferred loading found (10). No output-size, turn-limit or budget controls for a run were found beyond credit balances (5). No exit codes or error format, since there is no headless mode (3). Parallel workers in git worktrees and a review column make runs reviewable and reversible, with no resume by ID documented (10). No CLI, API or SDK. A pipeline can only reach Manager through a paired Telegram, Slack or Feishu bot (7). 10+5+3+10+7 = 35.\n\n### Security \u0026 auth: Paperclip +31\n\n- Paperclip (64): Harness reading of the framework checklist, as used for the other harnesses. 30 for what leaves the machine by default, 20 for approvals and sandboxing, 15 for prompt-injection posture, 15 for audit and 20 for the security programme. Anonymous usage telemetry is on by default and goes to telemetry.paperclip.ing. The README lists what is excluded and four opt-outs, and Sentry and OpenTelemetry stay off until configured. We found no first-run notice in the CLI source (18). Board approvals for hires and strategy, execution policies and per-action connection permissions, but `claude_local` defaults `dangerouslySkipPermissions` to true, `codex_local` defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, local agents run on the host, sandbox providers are optional plugins and the default `local_trusted` mode has no login (10). A documented `low_trust_review` preset contains agents that read untrusted pull requests or tickets. It is opt-in (10). An activity log of mutating actions, run logs, cost events and audited board API keys (14). SECURITY.md with GitHub private reporting and twelve advisories published per the 8 October check, three now with CVEs in OSV. No security.txt, bug bounty or SOC 2 report found (12).\n- Verdent (33): Framework reading (telemetry defaults, approvals, guardrails, sandboxing). Conversation history and tool results go to Verdent's US servers and on to Azure, Bedrock or Vertex, with zero data retention stated for Vertex and Bedrock only. Event logging to log.verdent.ai has no documented opt-out. BYOA keys stay on the machine (10). Plan Mode is read-only, Agent Mode asks before destructive commands and edits outside scope, and workers are isolated by git worktree, but there is no sandbox or network control and the approval list isn't enumerated (9). No prompt-injection guidance found, while web search and fetch results enter the context (2). Usage history in the dashboard, no audit log found (5). A security page with a disclosure address and a five-day acknowledgement, SOC 2 and ISO/IEC 42001 being pursued rather than held, no security.txt and no bug bounty (7). 10+9+2+5+7 = 33.\n\n### Schema \u0026 documentation: Paperclip +26\n\n- Paperclip (81): The running server publishes OpenAPI at `/api/openapi.json` and validates requests with Zod, and the MCP server's tools take Zod schemas. No copy of the spec is published on the docs site, and paperclip.ing/openapi.json describes only the website (22). llms.txt at paperclip.ing, and docs pages answer as Markdown at `.md` (10). An API reference page per resource and task guides, but the MCP tool descriptions are one line each, such as List agents in a company (13). Typed inputs throughout, apart from the `paperclipApiRequest` tool, which takes any path under `/api` and a JSON body (12). cURL, JavaScript and Python examples and a status-code table, with one `{error}` shape and an occasional `details` field (12). A changelog page for every stable release and release notes in the repository, but the API path carries no version (12).\n- Verdent (55): Framework reading for a harness. No schema for settings or output, only mcp.json examples in the standard mcpServers shape (5). Every current docs page has a Markdown twin at the same path with .md, though no llms.txt (10). The docs say when to use Agent Mode or Plan Mode and what Plan Mode can't do, but the Agent Mode page lists the actions that need approval only as \"certain tool executions\" and \"destructive operations\" (12). Modes and BYOA agent types are enumerated, permissions are not (5). Examples on the MCP, BYOA and messaging pages, and a recovery page, with no error codes (8). Version numbers and a dated public changelog (15). The archived 1.0 docs are still served beside the current ones. 5+10+12+5+8+15 = 55.\n\n### Maintenance \u0026 community: Paperclip +17\n\n- Paperclip (78): Version 2026.1023.0, released on 23 October 2026 per its notes and the site banner (30). Ten stable releases from 2026.817.0 (17 August) to 2026.1023.0 in the 90 days to 4 November (20). Per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November, 650 pull requests merged in the last 30 days, but 2,849 issues and 3,338 pull requests were open, 1,396 open issues had no comment, and 309 of the 472 still-open issues from the two weeks before had none (8). `paperclipai` and `@paperclipai/mcp-server` publish from the same release workflow. We did not check the MCP registry (12). CI on master, a lockfile refresh workflow and signed image attestations (8). 30 + 20 + 8 + 12 + 8 = 78.\n- Verdent (61): Closed service. v2.18.0 on 29 October 2026, eight days before this check (30). More than three dated releases in the 90 days from 8 August, among them 2.10.0 to 2.18.0 (20). A dated public changelog, a support address, Discord and a subreddit, with no public tracker to read reply times (8). No official SDK or MCP server to keep current (0). No public packages or CI to judge (3). 30+20+8+0+3 = 61.\n\n### Reliability: Paperclip +16\n\n- Paperclip (59): Read as local software. Official npm package `paperclipai` (Node.js 24.11 or newer) and a Docker image on GHCR (20). Public CI that runs the tests (pr-trusted.yml selects and runs the test shards, and e2e.yml runs the end-to-end suite), with the pass state on master unreadable on 4 November 2026 because GitHub's pages answer 403 here (15). Per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November, 2,849 open issues, 125 labelled bug, 1,599 opened before 8 July, and 78 closed in the last 30 days against 686 opened (6). Calendar versions in semver syntax, with a Breaking Changes section and an upgrade guide in release notes, but breaking changes arrive in ordinary releases and 2026.916.0 carried five (10). No 1.0. The npm `latest` tag is called the stable channel and follows a beta soak of at least three days, while the roadmap says the product is still moving quickly, so half credit (8). 20 + 15 + 6 + 10 + 8 = 59.\n- Verdent (43): Local-package reading, as for the other closed-source harnesses. The desktop app installs from verdent.ai with macOS 11 or later and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11 stated, and the extension from the editor marketplaces, but not from a package registry (15). No public CI or test suite, since the source isn't published (0). No public issue tracker, every task runs through Verdent's servers, and no status page was found, so there is no readable record (5). A dated changelog by version, with the end of Free Mode called out in v2.18.0, but no breaking-change sections (8). 2.18.0, generally available (15). 15+0+5+8+15 = 43.\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Paperclip | Verdent | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 59 | 43 | Paperclip +16 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 81 | 55 | Paperclip +26 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 70 | 35 | Paperclip +35 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 64 | 33 | Paperclip +31 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 60 | 20 | Paperclip +40 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 78 | 61 | Paperclip +17 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 66 | 55 | Paperclip +11 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | -15 | -2 | |\n| **Total** | | **52.6 · D** | **39.7 · E** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Paperclip | Verdent |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |\n| Vendor | Paperclip Labs, Inc. | Verdent AI, Inc. |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | | |\n| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |\n| Pricing | Free | Paid |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | MIT | Proprietary. The terms of use from Verdent AI, Inc. forbid reverse engineering or copying any component, and no source is published |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |\n| llms.txt | yes | no |\n| Last release | 2026-10-23 | 2026-10-29 |\n| Terms last updated | 2026-07-23 | 2026-05-25 |\n| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-07-23 | 2026-05-26 |\n| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | yes |\n| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |\n| Popularity | 99k stars, 60k npm/wk | none |\n\n## How the scores have moved\n\n### Paperclip\n\n- -6.4 on 4 November 2026 (C to D): correction\n- no change on 27 October 2026: checklist\n\n### Verdent\n\nNo score change since it was listed.\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Paperclip.** Board approvals, budgets with a hard stop and an activity log sit above whichever harnesses do the work, with ten stable versions in 90 days. The Claude Code and Codex adapters skip permission prompts and the sandbox by default, twelve security advisories have appeared since April 2026, and a 24 October cross-company read fix is in no stable release.\n\n**Verdent.** A desktop and editor coding agent that splits a goal into parallel workers in git worktrees, with a read-only Plan Mode, MCP servers and the option to run workers on Claude Code or Codex. It has no CLI, API or sandbox, sends context through Verdent's servers, and has had no free tier since 29 October 2026.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Paperclip\n\n1. Set `PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1` or `DO_NOT_TRACK=1` before the first start. Telemetry is on by default\n2. Set `dangerouslySkipPermissions` and `dangerouslyBypassApprovalsAndSandbox` to false on agents that read untrusted input, or run them in a sandbox provider\n3. Install with Node.js 24.11 or newer, and install and sign in to each harness CLI on the host first. Paperclip assumes they are there\n4. Use `--bind lan` or `--bind tailnet` at onboarding for anything beyond one machine. The default `local_trusted` mode treats every request as the board admin\n5. Treat 409 on task checkout as owned by another agent and pick different work. The API docs say not to retry\n\n### Verdent\n\n1. Don't plan to drive Verdent headless. Hand the task to the person using the desktop app, or use a harness with a print mode\n2. Start large changes in Plan Mode and review plan.md before switching to Agent Mode\n3. Add MCP servers in the project's .mcp.json or ~/.verdent/mcp.json in the mcpServers shape\n4. Keep work under git, since rollback relies on git and there is no sandbox\n5. Budget in credits at about $0.059 each, because there is no free allowance since 29 October 2026\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Paperclip or Verdent?\n\nPaperclip scores 52.6 (D) on agent readiness against Verdent's 39.7 (E), and leads in every scored category.\n\n### Are Paperclip and Verdent open source?\n\nPaperclip is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Verdent.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-verdent.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-verdent.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"paperclip\", \"b\": \"verdent\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare paperclip verdent`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/paperclip.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/verdent.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Paperclip or Verdent\n\n- [Agent Zero vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agent-zero-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Aider vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aider-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Amp vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Antigravity CLI vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Auggie CLI vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auggie-vs-verdent.md)\n- [AXLR vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axlr-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Claude Code vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Cline vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cline-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Conductor vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/conductor-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Crush vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Cursor CLI vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cursor-cli-vs-verdent.md)\n- [DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-verdent.md)\n- [dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-superagent-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Devin vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devin-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Droid CLI vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/droid-cli-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Pi vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/earendil-pi-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Emdash vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Gemini CLI vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-cli-vs-verdent.md)\n- [GitHub Copilot CLI vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/github-copilot-cli-vs-verdent.md)\n- [goose vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/goose-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Harness² vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness2-vs-verdent.md)\n- [HarnessRouter vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harnessrouter-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Jules vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jules-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Junie CLI vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/junie-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Kilo Code CLI vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kilo-code-cli-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Kimi Code CLI vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kimi-code-cli-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Kiro CLI vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kiro-cli-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Letta vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/letta-vs-verdent.md)\n- [mini-swe-agent vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mini-swe-agent-vs-verdent.md)\n- [MiniMax Code vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minimax-code-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Mistral Vibe CLI vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-vibe-cli-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Muse Code vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-code-vs-verdent.md)\n- [OpenAI Agents API vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-agents-api-vs-verdent.md)\n- [OpenAI Codex vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-codex-vs-verdent.md)\n- [OpenCode vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencode-vs-verdent.md)\n- [OpenHands vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openhands-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Orca vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/orca-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Paseo vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paseo-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Prime Agent vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prime-agent-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Qoder CLI vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qoder-cli-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Qwen Code vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen-code-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Mirror CLI vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-mirror-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Rovo Dev CLI vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/rovo-dev-cli-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Sculptor vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/sculptor-vs-verdent.md)\n- [T3 Code vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/t3-code-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Traycer vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/traycer-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Verdent vs Vibe-Trading](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/verdent-vs-vibe-trading.md)\n- [Verdent vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/verdent-vs-warp.md)\n- [Amp vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Antigravity CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Auggie CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auggie-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [AXLR vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axlr-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Claude Code vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-verdent.md)\n- [CLI Manager vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [CLI Manager vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Cline vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cline-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Conductor vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/conductor-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Crush vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-superagent-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Devin vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devin-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Droid CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/droid-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Emdash vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Gemini CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [GitHub Copilot CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/github-copilot-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [goose vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/goose-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Harness vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-autonomous-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Harness vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-autonomous-vs-verdent.md)\n- [HarnessRouter vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harnessrouter-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Jules vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jules-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Junie CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/junie-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Kilo Code CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kilo-code-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Kimi Code CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kimi-code-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Kiro CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kiro-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Letta vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/letta-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [MiniMax Code vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minimax-code-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Mistral Vibe CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-vibe-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Muse Code vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-code-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [OpenCode vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencode-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [OpenHands vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openhands-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [OpenMausBot vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openmausbot-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [OpenMausBot vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openmausbot-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Orca vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/orca-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Parallax](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-parallax-agents.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Paseo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-paseo.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Prime Agent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-prime-agent.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Qoder CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qoder-cli.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Qwen Code](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qwen-code.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Mirror CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-reflection-mirror.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Rovo Dev CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-rovo-dev-cli.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Sculptor](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-sculptor.md)\n- [Paperclip vs T3 Code](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-t3-code.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Traycer](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-traycer.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Unstoppable](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-unstoppable.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Vibe-Trading](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-vibe-trading.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-warp.md)\n- [Parallax vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/parallax-agents-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Unstoppable vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/unstoppable-vs-verdent.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-07", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.7", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Paperclip vs Verdent", "url": "" } ], "description": "Paperclip scores 52.6 (D) to Verdent's 39.7 (E) for multi-agent orchestration. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Paperclip D 52.6", "Verdent E 39.7", "scores" ], "h1": "Paperclip vs Verdent", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/paperclip-vs-verdent", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Paperclip vs Verdent for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-07", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-verdent" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 6350, "slim": 2830 }, "version": 1 }