# Pamba vs Xpoz MCP (slim)

> Xpoz MCP and Pamba score within a point of each other for social analytics, 41.5 and 41.2 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pamba-vs-xpoz-mcp.md (~3,650 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pamba-vs-xpoz-mcp.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pamba-vs-xpoz-mcp
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-13
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Xpoz MCP and Pamba score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 41.5 (E) and 41.2 (E). Pamba leads on reliability, schema & documentation, agent ergonomics, payments & pricing and maintenance & community. Both do social analytics.

- Pamba: E 41.2, rank #1334 of 1524 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pamba.min.md
- Xpoz MCP: E 41.5, rank #1328 of 1524 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/xpoz-mcp.min.md
- Pamba, good for Not recommended for the managed accounts. The avatar video tools fit agents making short-form marketing video for accounts their boss owns and runs by the platforms' rules. Ahead on Reliability, 45 against 20; Schema & documentation, 84 against 64; Agent ergonomics, 75 against 63; Payments & pricing, 53 against 45; Maintenance & community, 70 against 25.
- Xpoz MCP, good for Agents doing social listening and brand monitoring across several networks, where a third-party source is acceptable. Also No incidents deducted, where Pamba loses 15 points for them.

| Category | Pamba | Xpoz MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 45 | 20 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 84 | 64 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 75 | 63 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 35 | 37 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 53 | 45 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 70 | 25 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 28 | 29 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Pamba | Xpoz MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | MCP server |
| Vendor | Pamba | XPOZ |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.pamba.app/mcp` | `https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcp` |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth | API key |
| Licence | Closed service. No terms of service or privacy policy published; an acceptable use policy only | none |
| Tools exposed | 407 | 52 |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | `ai.xpoz/social-insights` |
| Last release | 2026-11-11 | none |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | not read yet |

Why the edge:
- Maintenance & community, Pamba +45: Pamba 70 (Closed service.); Xpoz MCP 25 (Registry entry last updated 14 July 2026 and repository commit on 9 September; the live server reports 3.0.0 (10).)
- Reliability, Pamba +25: Pamba 45 (Graded as a hosted service.); Xpoz MCP 20 (No status page found (0).)
- Schema & documentation, Pamba +20: Pamba 84 (No OpenAPI file found.); Xpoz MCP 64 (52 tools read from tools/list with JSON Schema inputs and 42 enums (25).)
- Agent ergonomics, Pamba +12: Pamba 75 (Read on the MCP server.); Xpoz MCP 63 (52 tools totalling about 238 KB (5).)
- Payments & pricing, Pamba +8: Pamba 53 (No x402, MPP or L402 (0).); Xpoz MCP 45 (No machine payment protocol (0).)