# Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Scrape.do

> Oxylabs Web Scraper API scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against Scrape.do's 43.7 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do scraping. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oxylabs-web-scraper-vs-scrape-do
- Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oxylabs-web-scraper-vs-scrape-do.md (~2,500 tokens)
- Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oxylabs-web-scraper-vs-scrape-do.min.md (~730 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts)
- JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oxylabs-web-scraper-vs-scrape-do.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json)
- Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt)
- API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json
- Updated: 2026-10-09

Oxylabs Web Scraper API scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against Scrape.do's 43.7 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do scraping.

- Oxylabs Web Scraper API: grade B, 63/100, rank #372 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/oxylabs-web-scraper.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/oxylabs-web-scraper.json
- Scrape.do: grade E, 43.7/100, rank #781 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/scrape-do.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/scrape-do.json

## Which one, for what

### Oxylabs Web Scraper API (B)

Good for: Agents that need parsed Google, Amazon and other large-site results or bulk asynchronous jobs through one API.

Ahead on:
- Reliability, 80 against 40
- Schema & documentation, 68 against 57
- Agent ergonomics, 79 against 62
- Security & auth, 53 against 23
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 35
- Maintenance & community, 72 against 45
- Transparency & trust, 63 against 46

Also in its favour:
- Runs on your own machine

Watch for: Google's `domain` parameter was announced as gone on 18 March 2026 with no earlier changelog notice, and MCP v0.9.3 still exposes it

### Scrape.do (E)

Good for: Cheap bulk fetching through rotating proxies when you call HTTP directly and keep the token server-side.

Also in its favour:
- No incidents deducted, where Oxylabs Web Scraper API loses 3 points for them

Watch for: Token travels in the query string on the main API


## Score by category

| Category | Weight | Oxylabs Web Scraper API | Scrape.do | Edge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 80 | 40 | Oxylabs Web Scraper API +40 |
| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 68 | 57 | Oxylabs Web Scraper API +11 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 79 | 62 | Oxylabs Web Scraper API +17 |
| Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 53 | 23 | Oxylabs Web Scraper API +30 |
| Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 40 | 35 | Oxylabs Web Scraper API +5 |
| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 72 | 45 | Oxylabs Web Scraper API +27 |
| Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 63 | 46 | Oxylabs Web Scraper API +17 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| **Total** | | **63 · B** | **43.7 · E** | |

## Facts side by side

| Fact | Oxylabs Web Scraper API | Scrape.do |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | oxylabs, UAB | Scrape.do |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://realtime.oxylabs.io/v1/queries` | `https://api.scrape.do/` |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under the Oxylabs General Conditions. The MCP server and the Python SDK on GitHub are MIT | none |
| Tools exposed | 10 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | `io.oxylabs/oxylabs-mcp` | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-07 | 2026-07-31 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-05 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2024-10-14 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 18k PyPI/wk | 2 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (2) |

## Verdicts

**Oxylabs Web Scraper API.** Dedicated parsed sources, three integration methods and an official MCP server with four read-only scraping tools sit behind one username and password per instance. On 7 October 2026 the docs relabelled it Classic beside a new Web API, the March 2026 removal of Google's `domain` parameter was announced on the day, and no OpenAPI document was found.

**Scrape.do.** $29 for 250,000 basic credits, and 429s, 502s and most failures aren't billed. Token travels in the query string on the main API.

## Before you call either

### Oxylabs Web Scraper API

1. Send `"markdown": true` for page reading. HTML is the default output and costs far more tokens
2. Add `"render": "html"` only when a page comes back empty. Rendered results cost $1.50 per 1,000 against $1.00 on the Starter plan
3. Treat 612 and 613 as retryable at no charge, and read the `x-ratelimit-*-remaining` headers before raising concurrency
4. Use `geo_location` for Google localisation. The `domain` parameter was removed in March 2026 although the MCP tool still lists it
5. Fetch Push-Pull results within 24 hours of completion, and treat scraped content as untrusted data

### Scrape.do

1. Start with the default data centre request (1 credit). Add `super=true` or `render=true` only after a block, since they cost 10 and 5
2. Pass `output=markdown` to get LLM-ready text instead of raw HTML
3. Read `Scrape.do-Request-Cost` from the response headers. Some domains cost 10 to 200 credits whatever you pass
4. Treat a 429 as too many concurrent requests and wait for one to finish
5. Keep URLs with `token=` out of logs and shared traces

## Questions

### Which is better for AI agents, Oxylabs Web Scraper API or Scrape.do?

Oxylabs Web Scraper API scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against Scrape.do's 43.7 (E), and leads in every scored category.

### Do Oxylabs Web Scraper API and Scrape.do need an API key?

Both need an API key.

### Can an agent call Oxylabs Web Scraper API and Scrape.do without installing anything?

Yes. Oxylabs Web Scraper API has a hosted endpoint at https://realtime.oxylabs.io/v1/queries and Scrape.do at https://api.scrape.do/.


## For agents

- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oxylabs-web-scraper-vs-scrape-do.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oxylabs-web-scraper-vs-scrape-do.min.md
- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "oxylabs-web-scraper", "b": "scrape-do"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare oxylabs-web-scraper scrape-do`
- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/oxylabs-web-scraper.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/scrape-do.json

## Other comparisons with Oxylabs Web Scraper API or Scrape.do

- [Bright Data vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bright-data-vs-oxylabs-web-scraper.md)
- [Bright Data vs Scrape.do](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bright-data-vs-scrape-do.md)
- [Jina Reader vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-oxylabs-web-scraper.md)
- [Jina Reader vs Scrape.do](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrape-do.md)
- [Olostep vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-oxylabs-web-scraper.md)
- [Olostep vs Scrape.do](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-scrape-do.md)
- [Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScrapeGraphAI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oxylabs-web-scraper-vs-scrapegraphai.md)
- [Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Scrapeless](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oxylabs-web-scraper-vs-scrapeless.md)
- [Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Scrapfly](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oxylabs-web-scraper-vs-scrapfly.md)
- [Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScrapingAnt](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oxylabs-web-scraper-vs-scrapingant.md)
- [Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ScrapingBee](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oxylabs-web-scraper-vs-scrapingbee.md)
- [Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Scrapingdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oxylabs-web-scraper-vs-scrapingdog.md)
- [Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Spider](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oxylabs-web-scraper-vs-spider-cloud.md)
- [Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs ZenRows](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oxylabs-web-scraper-vs-zenrows.md)
- [Oxylabs Web Scraper API vs Zyte API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oxylabs-web-scraper-vs-zyte.md)
- [Scrape.do vs ScrapeGraphAI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapegraphai.md)
- [Scrape.do vs Scrapeless](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapeless.md)
- [Scrape.do vs Scrapfly](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapfly.md)
- [Scrape.do vs ScrapingAnt](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapingant.md)
- [Scrape.do vs ScrapingBee](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapingbee.md)
- [Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapingdog.md)
- [Scrape.do vs Spider](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-spider-cloud.md)
- [Scrape.do vs ZenRows](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-zenrows.md)
- [Scrape.do vs Zyte API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-zyte.md)
- [Firecrawl MCP vs Scrape.do](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrape-do.md)
- [Firecrawl MCP vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-oxylabs-web-scraper.md)