# OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Step 3.7 Flash (slim)

> Step 3.7 Flash scores 59.8 (C) to OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT's 56.8 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/otel-2-0-llm-31b-it-vs-step-3-7-flash.md (~10,200 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/otel-2-0-llm-31b-it-vs-step-3-7-flash.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/otel-2-0-llm-31b-it-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Step 3.7 Flash scores 59.8 (C) on agent readiness against OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT's 56.8 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT leads on risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT: C 56.8, rank #111 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/otel-2-0-llm-31b-it.min.md
- Step 3.7 Flash: C 59.8, rank #93 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/step-3-7-flash.min.md
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT, good for Telecoms teams that want an open model for standards questions and RAG on their own hardware Ahead on Risk, 55 against 45; Documentation and upkeep, 74 against 39.
- Step 3.7 Flash, good for Teams with a GPU server or a provider account that want an open, long-context agent model with vision Ahead on Reach, 70 against 50; Agent interface, 85 against 60.

| Category | OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT | Step 3.7 Flash |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 50 | 70 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 45 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 60 | 85 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 74 | 39 |

| Fact (where they differ) | OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT | Step 3.7 Flash |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | AT&T (Open Telco AI) | StepFun |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 (metadata and card; no LICENSE file) |
| Last release | 2026-11-01 | 2026-06-03 |

Why the edge:
- Documentation and upkeep, OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT +35: OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT 74 (Model card 14, Intended use, a long limitations section, the architecture and training method, the parameters (31B) and the language (English) are on the card.); Step 3.7 Flash 39 (Model card 14, Intended use, the architecture, the parameters, the context and the language (in the metadata) are on the card.)
- Agent interface, Step 3.7 Flash +25: OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT 60 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, 19,300 characters, the publisher's own.); Step 3.7 Flash 85 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (5,723 characters).)
- Reach, Step 3.7 Flash +20: OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT 50 (Memory 10, the publisher's only build is the BF16 safetensors, 62.55 GB for the 15 shards the index names, and 62.55 GB × 1.2 = 75.1 GB, above 64 GB and inside…); Step 3.7 Flash 70 (Memory 5, the smallest build at 4 bits is StepFun's IQ4_XS GGUF, 104.99 GB with the 3.97 GB projector, and 108.96 GB × 1.2 = 130.8 GB, over what the reference m…)
- Risk, OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT +10: OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT 55 (File safety 25, safetensors only, with no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python files.); Step 3.7 Flash 45 (File safety 15, safetensors and GGUF only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25).)