# Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B (slim)

> Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B and Ornith-1.5-9B score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 61 and 61 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ornith-1-5-35b-a3b-vs-ornith-1-5-9b.md (~6,250 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ornith-1-5-35b-a3b-vs-ornith-1-5-9b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ornith-1-5-35b-a3b-vs-ornith-1-5-9b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B and Ornith-1.5-9B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Ornith-1.5-9B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B: C 61, rank #43 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ornith-1-5-35b-a3b.min.md
- Ornith-1.5-9B: C 61, rank #44 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ornith-1-5-9b.min.md
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B, good for Local coding and terminal agents on a 24 to 32 GB GPU or a Mac, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
- Ornith-1.5-9B, good for Local coding and terminal agents on a laptop or a single consumer GPU, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required Ahead on Reach, 95 against 90.

| Category | Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B | Ornith-1.5-9B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 90 | 95 |
| Risk (20%) | 50 | 50 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 85 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 31 | 31 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B | Ornith-1.5-9B |
| --- | --- | --- |