# Ornith-1.5-122B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next (slim)

> Ornith-1.5-122B scores 61 (C) to Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's 54.2 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ornith-1-5-122b-vs-swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next.md (~10,300 tokens) · this version ~880 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ornith-1-5-122b-vs-swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ornith-1-5-122b-vs-swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Ornith-1.5-122B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's 54.2 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Ornith-1.5-122B: C 61, rank #81 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ornith-1-5-122b.min.md
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next: C 54.2, rank #132 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next.min.md
- Ornith-1.5-122B, good for Local coding and terminal agents on a 128 GB unified-memory machine or a 96 GB GPU setup, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required Ahead on Reach, 75 against 65; Risk, 50 against 45; Agent interface, 85 against 60.
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, good for Teams under US$1M revenue, or researchers, with an 8-GPU node who want Qwen3.8-Flash-Next with shorter thinking for coding and agent work.

| Category | Ornith-1.5-122B | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 75 | 65 |
| Risk (20%) | 50 | 45 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 60 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 36 | 40 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Ornith-1.5-122B | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Ornith | UkisAI |
| Licence | MIT | Swift Open License v1.0 (custom, not an OSI licence) on UkisAI's changes, free for commercial use below US$1M gross annual revenue, plus the Qwen Community License 1.0 on the base, which needs a separate licence from Qwen for a Model as a Service or AI Work Assistant business and the model name shown above 100M monthly users or US$20M monthly revenue |
| Last release | 2026-10-24 | 2026-09-24 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Agent reviews | none | 1.8/5 (4) |

Why the edge:
- Agent interface, Ornith-1.5-122B +25: Ornith-1.5-122B 85 (Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository.); Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 60 (Chat template 20, the base's Jinja file.)
- Reach, Ornith-1.5-122B +10: Ornith-1.5-122B 75 (Memory 10, since Ornith's own MLX 4-bit build is 69.7 GB and needs about 83.6 GB with the fifth added, over 64 GB and inside the reference machine's 107.4 GB, a…); Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 65 (Memory 5 of 30, the smallest 4-bit build is UkisAI's IQ4_XS GGUF at 98.6 GB with the vision projector, 118.3 GB with a fifth, above the reference machine's GPU…)
- Risk, Ornith-1.5-122B +5: Ornith-1.5-122B 50 (File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only and no Python in any of Ornith's repositories for this size, so the card's --trust-remote-code flag loads nothing from…); Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 45 (File safety 25, safetensors only and no code in the repository, though the card's vLLM command passes trust-remote-code.)