# Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B (slim)

> Ornith-1.5-122B scores 61 (C) to Qwen3.5-0.8B's 46.7 (D) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ornith-1-5-122b-vs-qwen3-5-0-8b.md (~9,100 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ornith-1-5-122b-vs-qwen3-5-0-8b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ornith-1-5-122b-vs-qwen3-5-0-8b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Ornith-1.5-122B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Qwen3.5-0.8B's 46.7 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Qwen3.5-0.8B leads on reach and risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Ornith-1.5-122B: C 61, rank #81 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ornith-1-5-122b.min.md
- Qwen3.5-0.8B: D 46.7, rank #156 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-5-0-8b.min.md
- Ornith-1.5-122B, good for Local coding and terminal agents on a 128 GB unified-memory machine or a 96 GB GPU setup, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required Ahead on Agent interface, 85 against 60.
- Qwen3.5-0.8B, good for Builders who want a near-free local helper or fine-tuning base for narrow tasks on a phone-class device, laptop or CPU Ahead on Reach, 80 against 75; Risk, 55 against 50.

| Category | Ornith-1.5-122B | Qwen3.5-0.8B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 75 | 80 |
| Risk (20%) | 50 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 60 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 36 | 37 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Ornith-1.5-122B | Qwen3.5-0.8B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Ornith | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-10-24 | 2026-03-02 |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |

Why the edge:
- Agent interface, Ornith-1.5-122B +25: Ornith-1.5-122B 85 (Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository.); Qwen3.5-0.8B 60 (The template ships in the repository (20) and the model was trained for tool use with several calls per turn in the template (20).)
- Reach, Qwen3.5-0.8B +5: Ornith-1.5-122B 75 (Memory 10, since Ornith's own MLX 4-bit build is 69.7 GB and needs about 83.6 GB with the fifth added, over 64 GB and inside the reference machine's 107.4 GB, a…); Qwen3.5-0.8B 80 (Memory earns the full 30, since LM Studio's Q4_K_M build with its projector is 0.73 GB (0.88 GB with the fifth added) and Ollama's Q8_0 build was 1.0 GB, both f…)
- Risk, Qwen3.5-0.8B +5: Ornith-1.5-122B 50 (File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only and no Python in any of Ornith's repositories for this size, so the card's --trust-remote-code flag loads nothing from…); Qwen3.5-0.8B 55 (Safetensors only with no remote code gives file safety its 25, and files in the Qwen organisation the publisher's GitHub links to, each with a hash on the Hub…)