# Orchid vs PicoClaw (slim)

> PicoClaw scores 46.1 (D) to Orchid's 20.2 (F) for assistants reached by message. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/orchid-ai-vs-picoclaw.md (~3,450 tokens) · this version ~580 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/orchid-ai-vs-picoclaw.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/orchid-ai-vs-picoclaw
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-13

PicoClaw scores 46.1 (D) on agent readiness against Orchid's 20.2 (F), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistants reached by message.

- Orchid: F 20.2, rank #992 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/orchid-ai.min.md
- PicoClaw: D 46.1, rank #883 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/picoclaw.min.md
- Orchid, good for A founder or operator who wants Gmail and calendar triage by text with approval before anything leaves. Also No incidents deducted, where PicoClaw loses 7 points for them.
- PicoClaw, good for A person who wants a chat-app assistant on a cheap Linux board, an old Android phone or a home server, with reminders, web search and file memory, and who accepts running software its maker calls pre-production. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 51 against 10; Agent ergonomics, 66 against 0; Security & auth, 51 against 0; Payments & pricing, 60 against 10. Also No key needed to call it; Free to start without a card; Open source.

| Category | Orchid | PicoClaw |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 50 | 54 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 10 | 51 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 0 | 66 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 0 | 51 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 10 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 24 | 22 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 60 | 56 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Orchid | PicoClaw |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | Platform | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Zero Email, Inc. | Sipeed |
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Licence | Closed service under Orchid's Terms of Service (Zero Email, Inc., last updated 16 January 2026). | MIT |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | none | 2026-07-03 |
| Terms last updated |  | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated |  | no document linked |
| Popularity | none | 30k stars |