{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "openproject", "name": "OpenProject", "vendor": "OpenProject GmbH", "vendorUrl": "https://www.openproject.org", "kind": "http-api", "category": "project-management", "summary": "OpenProject is open-source project management software for work packages, Gantt plans, boards and time tracking, sold as a cloud service and for self-hosting. Agents reach it through the APIv3 REST API, and paid plans add an MCP server.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/openproject", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/openproject.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/openproject.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/openproject.json", "repo": "https://github.com/opf/openproject", "license": "GPL-3.0 for the OpenProject source. Enterprise add-ons need a paid token, and OpenProject Enterprise cloud runs under OpenProject's Terms of Service", "transports": [ "http" ], "packages": [], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "Access is self-serve. A user creates a named personal API token in account settings and sends it as `Authorization: Bearer`, or as the Basic auth password with the user name `apikey`. The token carries that user's permissions, and no per-token scope or expiry was found. An administrator can register OAuth 2.0 applications for the authorisation code grant, PKCE or client credentials, with one scope per API (`api_v3`, `mcp`, `scim_v2`, `bcf_v2_1`). JWTs from a configured OIDC provider are also accepted. No app review or partner approval is described.", "pricing": "freemium", "pricingNotes": "The Community edition is free to self-host with the REST API included, and the cloud has a 14-day trial with no credit card, so an agent can start without a contract. Cloud plans are per user per month on a yearly term, Basic $7.25 (from 5 users, $8.50 on a monthly term), Professional $13.50 (from 25 users) and Premium $19.50 (from 100 users), with Corporate on request. Euro prices are 5.95, 10.95 and 15.95. API calls are not priced. The MCP server needs Professional or above. Community is not sold as a cloud plan (https://www.openproject.org/pricing/, checked 2026-10-08).", "priceSummary": "$7.25 / seat-mo", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the API docs, the OpenAPI document or the pricing page (checked 2026-10-08).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": 16352, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-10-08" }, "docsUrl": "https://www.openproject.org/docs/api/", "openapi": "https://www.openproject.org/docs/api/v3/spec.yml", "capabilities": [ "tasks.create", "tasks.update", "projects.manage", "tasks.comments", "projects.reporting", "events.webhooks-send" ], "tags": [ "official", "hosted", "self-hosted", "open-source", "rest", "openapi", "oauth", "mcp", "freemium", "free-trial", "webhooks", "status-page", "sla", "eu-hosting", "project-management" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-01", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 57.4, "grade": "C", "agentReady": false, "rank": 550, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 842, "categoryRank": 11, "methodology": "0.4", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 75, "payments": 30, "reliability": 52, "schema": 76, "security": 59, "transparency": 87 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-08" }, "negative": -5, "negativeNotes": [ "2026-06-08. 13 advisories rated critical were published against opf/openproject between January and June 2026, among them cache store poisoning leading to remote code execution (GHSA-qj96-f42f-6336, fixed in 17.3.3 and 17.4.1), SQL injection in the timestamps function (GHSA-98vw-2r87-fx2r) and a pre-authentication remote code execution in the Docker image through a default secret key (GHSA-r85r-gjq2-f83r, 13 May 2026). OpenProject published them itself, and its policy is to publish each advisory with the fixing release, so the deduction is reduced, -3 (https://github.com/opf/openproject/security/advisories).", "2026-09-30. 83 advisories in all were published in the twelve months to 8 October 2026, several of them missing permission checks in APIv3 that exposed private work package data across projects. Several credit the YesWeHack bounty sponsored by the European Commission. The advisories give self-hosted version numbers and do not say when the cloud was patched. Fixed and published, -2 (https://github.com/opf/openproject/security/advisories)." ], "verdict": "OpenProject's APIv3 has a public OpenAPI 3.1 document with 320 operations, stable error identifiers and optimistic locking, and the same API ships in the free GPL-3.0 Community edition. No request limits are published, API tokens carry their user's full permissions, and 83 security advisories were published in the last twelve months, 13 rated critical.", "bestFor": "Teams that want a self-hostable or EU-hosted project tool with Gantt, time tracking and budgets, and an agent working through a documented REST API.", "strengths": [ "OpenAPI 3.1 document with 234 paths and 320 operations, public on the docs site and served by every instance at `/api/v3/spec.json`", "Errors carry a stable `errorIdentifier` URN, and validation failures list one entry per property", "The Community edition is GPL-3.0 and free to self-host with the REST API included, and the cloud trial needs no credit card", "Seven releases between 5 August and 1 October 2026, with security fixes published as GitHub advisories and CVEs", "The service description commits to 99.9 per cent yearly availability with service credits, and an EU shard keeps all sub-processors in the EU" ], "weaknesses": [ "83 advisories published against opf/openproject in the twelve months to 8 October 2026, 13 rated critical, among them remote code execution and SQL injection", "No request limit, 429 behaviour or Retry-After guidance is published for the cloud API", "Personal API tokens act with their user's full permissions, and OAuth has one scope per API with no read-only form", "No official SDK. The client libraries the docs list are community projects the vendor says it does not vet", "The MCP server is an Enterprise add-on for the Professional plan and above, which starts at 25 users" ], "agentNotes": [ "Send the API token as `Authorization: Bearer \u003ctoken\u003e`, or as the Basic auth password with the user name `apikey`", "Read the resource first and send its current `lockVersion` with every PATCH. A stale value returns 409 `UpdateConflict`", "POST to the `/form` endpoint of a work package to learn writable fields and allowed values before creating or updating", "URL-encode `filters` as a JSON array, and add `pageSize`, `offset` and `select` to keep work package lists small", "Run the agent as a dedicated user with a narrow project role, and treat work package text and comments as untrusted input" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "C", "methodology": "0.4", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 57.4 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 75, "payments": 30, "reliability": 52, "schema": 76, "security": 59, "transparency": 79 }, "provenanceScore": 95 }, "connect": { "http": "curl -H \"Authorization: Bearer $API_KEY\" https://community.openproject.org/api/v3/users/42" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/tasks.create", "tool": "https://letme.dev/openproject" }, "area": "business", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Community (self-hosted)", "unit": "seat-month", "usd": 0, "note": "free, REST API included; not sold as a cloud plan" }, { "item": "Basic (cloud)", "unit": "seat-month", "usd": 7.25, "note": "yearly term, from 5 users; $8.50 on a monthly term" }, { "item": "Professional (cloud)", "unit": "seat-month", "usd": 13.5, "note": "yearly term, from 25 users; includes the MCP server" }, { "item": "Premium (cloud)", "unit": "seat-month", "usd": 19.5, "note": "yearly term, from 100 users" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "OpenProject GmbH", "domain": "openproject.org", "domainRegistered": "2003-10-24", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.openproject.org/legal/terms-of-service/", "privacy": "https://www.openproject.org/legal/privacy/", "statusPage": "https://status.openproject.com", "changelog": "https://www.openproject.org/docs/release-notes/", "securityTxt": "valid", "checked": "2026-10-08", "notes": [ "The Terms of Service (last updated 6 August 2026) name OpenProject GmbH, Krausenstrasse 9, 10117 Berlin, Germany, and cover both the cloud and the on-premises Enterprise edition. The German version takes precedence.", "The privacy policy (version 30 July 2026) has a section on OpenProject Enterprise Cloud, where OpenProject GmbH is processor and the customer controller. The data processing agreement at https://www.openproject.org/legal/data-processing-agreement/ is part of the terms.", "Cloud instances answer at \u003cname\u003e.openproject.com or, on the EU shard, an openproject.eu host. Both are the vendor's domains, apart from the openproject.org site that carries the docs and legal pages. Self-hosted instances answer on the owner's domain.", "www.openproject.org/.well-known/security.txt is PGP-signed, names security@openproject.com and expires on 31 December 2026.", "RDAP for openproject.org gives a registration date of 2003-10-24 and InterNetX GmbH as registrar." ], "score": 95 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/openproject.json", "live": { "slug": "openproject", "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.openproject.com", "indicator": "unknown", "summary": "no machine-readable status found", "checkedAt": "2026-10-09T07:58:22.822468534Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-10-09T07:58:22.822468534Z" } }, "answer": "Wrike scores 60.1 (C) on agent readiness against OpenProject's 57.4 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. OpenProject leads on agent ergonomics, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust.", "b": { "slug": "wrike", "name": "Wrike", "vendor": "Wrike, Inc.", "vendorUrl": "https://www.wrike.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "project-management", "summary": "Wrike is a hosted work management platform for tasks, projects, folders, approvals and request forms. Agents reach it through REST API v4 and an official remote MCP server at mcp.wrike.com/v2 with 29 documented tools.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/wrike", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/wrike.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/wrike.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/wrike.json", "repo": "https://github.com/wrike/agent-skills", "license": "Proprietary service under Wrike's terms. The agent skills repository on GitHub is MIT", "transports": [ "http", "streamable-http" ], "remoteUrl": "https://www.wrike.com/api/v4", "packages": [], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "Self-serve. Any Wrike user with API permission creates an API app under Apps \u0026 Integrations and gets an OAuth client ID and secret, with no app review. The API uses the OAuth 2.0 authorisation code flow with scopes such as wsReadOnly and wsReadWrite, one-hour access tokens and refresh tokens. A permanent access token from the same app never expires and acts with all of its user's access. The MCP server at mcp.wrike.com/v2 takes OAuth 2.0 through an admin-created app or a permanent token as a Bearer header. Clients that need dynamic client registration are told to use the permanent token. Password resets and deactivation revoke tokens.", "pricing": "freemium", "pricingNotes": "The API and the MCP server are included on every plan, and Wrike charges nothing per call. Free is $0, Team $10 a user a month (2 to 15 users), Business $25 a user a month (5 to 200 users), and Pinnacle and Apex are quoted by sales. A 14-day trial needs no card, so an agent's owner can start on Free or the trial without a contract. Some fields and tools depend on the plan (checked 2026-10-08).", "priceSummary": "$10 / seat-mo", "where": "hosted", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the developer docs, the llms.txt index or the pricing page (checked 2026-10-08).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 29, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-10-08" }, "docsUrl": "https://developers.wrike.com", "llmsTxt": "https://developers.wrike.com/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "tasks.create", "tasks.update", "projects.manage", "tasks.comments", "projects.reporting", "automation.webhooks" ], "tags": [ "official", "hosted", "mcp", "oauth", "openapi", "llms-txt", "webhooks", "freemium", "free-tier", "no-card", "closed-source", "status-page", "soc2" ], "lastRelease": "2026-09-17", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 60.1, "grade": "C", "agentReady": false, "rank": 480, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 842, "categoryRank": 10, "methodology": "0.4", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 63, "maintenance": 63, "payments": 30, "reliability": 68, "schema": 78, "security": 60, "transparency": 78 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-08" }, "negative": -3, "negativeNotes": [ "17 September 2026. The API changelog says the task dependency endpoints 'now' need the TaskDatesAndDependenciesEdit right and reject callers without it with 403, with no earlier notice found. The change is documented with the action required, so the smallest deduction applies (https://developers.wrike.com/changelog/permission-checks-enforced-on-task-dependency-endpoints)." ], "verdict": "The official MCP server has 29 documented tools for search, task and project creation, bulk updates, comments and approvals, and it works on every plan including Free. Permanent access tokens never expire and carry the user's full access, and no SLA, official SDK or deprecation policy was found in the reviewed documentation.", "bestFor": "Teams already on Wrike that want an assistant to find work, create tasks and projects from notes, update status in bulk, comment and check approvals.", "strengths": [ "Official remote MCP server at https://mcp.wrike.com/v2 over Streamable HTTP, with 29 documented tools and no delete tool", "REST API v4 and the MCP server are included on every plan, Free among them, and the 14-day trial needs no card", "OpenAPI 3.0.1 definitions on each of 244 reference pages, plus llms.txt and Markdown copies of the docs", "OAuth 2.0 authorisation code flow with read-only and read-write scopes and one-hour access tokens", "SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001, 27017, 27018 and 27701 named on the trust centre, and a valid security.txt" ], "weaknesses": [ "A permanent access token never expires and reaches everything its user can, and it is the documented route for clients that need dynamic client registration", "The API accepts the access token as an `access_token` query parameter as a documented option", "No SLA, idempotency keys or Retry-After header found in the reviewed documentation", "No official SDK, and the official MCP registry lists only a third-party Wrike server (ai.waystation/wrike)", "The status page is a single timeline with no API or MCP component, and user audit reports are limited to Pinnacle and Apex" ], "agentNotes": [ "Build API URLs from the `host` value returned by /oauth2/token. Accounts live on www.wrike.com, app-eu.wrike.com or app-us2.wrike.com, and the wrong host answers 401.", "Use https://mcp.wrike.com/v2 only. The older /app/mcp/stream and /app/mcp/sse URLs serve the v1 tool set.", "Call `search_workflows` before setting a status, because `update_items` and `search_items` take custom status ids.", "Stay under about 400 requests a minute per token or IP and back off exponentially on 429. Use POST /batch for up to 100 operations.", "Page task lists with `pageSize` (up to 1,000) and `nextPageToken`, and request optional data through `fields`." ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "C", "methodology": "0.4", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 60.1 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 63, "maintenance": 63, "payments": 30, "reliability": 68, "schema": 78, "security": 60, "transparency": 62 }, "provenanceScore": 94 }, "connect": { "http": "curl -X GET -H \"Authorization: bearer $WRIKE_ACCESS_TOKEN\" \"https://www.wrike.com/api/v4/contacts?me=true\"", "config": { "mcpServers": { "wrike": { "args": [ "mcp-remote", "https://mcp.wrike.com/v2", "--header", "Authorization:Bearer YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN" ], "command": "npx" } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/tasks.create", "tool": "https://letme.dev/wrike" }, "area": "business", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Free (API and MCP server included)", "unit": "seat-month", "usd": 0, "note": "2 GB of storage per account" }, { "item": "Team", "unit": "seat-month", "usd": 10, "note": "2 to 15 users, as shown on 2026-10-08" }, { "item": "Business", "unit": "seat-month", "usd": 25, "note": "5 to 200 users, as shown on 2026-10-08" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Wrike, Inc.", "domain": "wrike.com", "domainRegistered": "2005-10-15", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.wrike.com/security/terms/", "privacy": "https://www.wrike.com/security/privacy/", "statusPage": "https://status.wrike.com", "changelog": "https://developers.wrike.com/changelog", "securityTxt": "valid", "checked": "2026-10-08", "notes": [ "The terms name Wrike, Inc. or its affiliate on the order, with a principal office at 550 West B Street, Floor 4, PMB 2305, San Diego, CA 92101, and apply to orders effective on or after 8 April 2025.", "The API answers on wrike.com hosts (www, app-eu, app-us2) and the MCP server at mcp.wrike.com.", "www.wrike.com/.well-known/security.txt names a report form and appsec@team.wrike.com and expires on 10 October 2026, two days after this check.", "RDAP for wrike.com gives a registration date of 2005-10-15.", "status.wrike.com/history redirects to a 404 page. The timeline is read from status.wrike.com/json, the feed the page itself loads." ], "score": 94 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/wrike.json", "live": { "slug": "wrike", "probe": { "target": "https://www.wrike.com/api/v4", "method": "get", "lastAt": "2026-10-09T10:43:02.2864011Z", "lastOk": true, "lastStatus": 401, "lastMs": 174, "lastNote": "asks for credentials", "authRequired": true, "uptime24h": 100, "uptime30d": 100, "p50ms24h": 175, "p95ms24h": 228, "samples24h": 207, "samples30d": 207, "days": [ { "date": "2026-10-08", "probes": 93, "ok": 93 }, { "date": "2026-10-09", "probes": 114, "ok": 114 } ] }, "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.wrike.com", "indicator": "unknown", "summary": "no machine-readable status found", "checkedAt": "2026-10-09T07:58:41.478376372Z" }, "githubStars": 0, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://wrike.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "valid", "expires": "2026-10-10T11:59:00Z", "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T15:38:51.176012566Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://developers.wrike.com/changelog", "kind": "changelog", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T18:18:05.203147743Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "cf826d2d7e5d" }, { "url": "https://www.wrike.com/security/privacy/", "kind": "privacy", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T18:31:40.410565321Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "edd029b4b88b" }, { "url": "https://www.wrike.com/security/terms/", "kind": "terms", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T18:31:42.63251747Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "6a9b72566372" } ], "updatedAt": "2026-10-09T10:43:02.2864011Z" } }, "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "HTTP API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "OpenProject GmbH", "b": "Wrike, Inc.", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "https://www.wrike.com/api/v4", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "HTTP", "b": "HTTP, Streamable HTTP", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "OAuth or key", "b": "OAuth or key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Freemium", "b": "Freemium", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "GPL-3.0 for the OpenProject source. Enterprise add-ons need a paid token, and OpenProject Enterprise cloud runs under OpenProject's Terms of Service", "b": "Proprietary service under Wrike's terms. The agent skills repository on GitHub is MIT", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "none", "b": "29", "name": "Tools exposed" }, { "a": "no", "b": "yes", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "no", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-10-01", "b": "2026-09-17", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "2026-08-06", "b": "2025-04-08", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "no date given", "b": "2026-06-01", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "yes", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "yes", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "yes", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "16k stars", "b": "none", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Wrike scores 60.1 (C) on agent readiness against OpenProject's 57.4 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. OpenProject leads on agent ergonomics, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, OpenProject or Wrike?" }, { "answer": "Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.", "question": "Do OpenProject and Wrike need an API key?" }, { "answer": "No hosted endpoint is listed for OpenProject. Wrike has a hosted endpoint at https://www.wrike.com/api/v4.", "question": "Can an agent call OpenProject and Wrike without installing anything?" }, { "answer": "OpenProject is open source (GPL-3.0 for the OpenProject source. Enterprise add-ons need a paid token, and OpenProject Enterprise cloud runs under OpenProject's Terms of Service). No open-source release is listed for Wrike.", "question": "Are OpenProject and Wrike open source?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Agent ergonomics, 70 against 63", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 75 against 63", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 87 against 78" ], "also": [ "Open source" ], "goodFor": "Teams that want a self-hostable or EU-hosted project tool with Gantt, time tracking and budgets, and an agent working through a documented REST API.", "slug": "openproject", "watchFor": "83 advisories published against opf/openproject in the twelve months to 8 October 2026, 13 rated critical, among them remote code execution and SQL injection" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 68 against 52" ], "also": [ "A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install", "Free to start without a card" ], "goodFor": "Teams already on Wrike that want an assistant to find work, create tasks and projects from notes, update status in bulk, comment and check approvals.", "slug": "wrike", "watchFor": "A permanent access token never expires and reaches everything its user can, and it is the documented route for clients that need dynamic client registration" } ], "job": { "capability": "tasks.create", "name": "Tasks create" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/asana-vs-openproject.json", "title": "Asana vs OpenProject", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/asana-vs-openproject" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/asana-vs-wrike.json", "title": "Asana vs Wrike", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/asana-vs-wrike" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/basecamp-vs-openproject.json", "title": "Basecamp vs OpenProject", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/basecamp-vs-openproject" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/basecamp-vs-wrike.json", "title": "Basecamp vs Wrike", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/basecamp-vs-wrike" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clickup-vs-openproject.json", "title": "ClickUp vs OpenProject", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clickup-vs-openproject" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clickup-vs-wrike.json", "title": "ClickUp vs Wrike", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clickup-vs-wrike" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/monday-vs-openproject.json", "title": "monday.com vs OpenProject", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/monday-vs-openproject" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/monday-vs-wrike.json", "title": "monday.com vs Wrike", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/monday-vs-wrike" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-plane.json", "title": "OpenProject vs Plane", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-plane" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-roma.json", "title": "OpenProject vs Roma", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-roma" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-shortcut.json", "title": "OpenProject vs Shortcut", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-shortcut" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-taiga.json", "title": "OpenProject vs Taiga", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-taiga" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-teamwork.json", "title": "OpenProject vs Teamwork.com", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-teamwork" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-todoist.json", "title": "OpenProject vs Todoist", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-todoist" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-trello.json", "title": "OpenProject vs Trello", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-trello" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-youtrack.json", "title": "OpenProject vs YouTrack", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-youtrack" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/plane-vs-wrike.json", "title": "Plane vs Wrike", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/plane-vs-wrike" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/roma-vs-wrike.json", "title": "Roma vs Wrike", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/roma-vs-wrike" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/shortcut-vs-wrike.json", "title": "Shortcut vs Wrike", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/shortcut-vs-wrike" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/taiga-vs-wrike.json", "title": "Taiga vs Wrike", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/taiga-vs-wrike" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/teamwork-vs-wrike.json", "title": "Teamwork.com vs Wrike", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/teamwork-vs-wrike" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/todoist-vs-wrike.json", "title": "Todoist vs Wrike", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/todoist-vs-wrike" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/trello-vs-wrike.json", "title": "Trello vs Wrike", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/trello-vs-wrike" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/wrike-vs-youtrack.json", "title": "Wrike vs YouTrack", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/wrike-vs-youtrack" } ], "scores": [ { "by": 16, "edge": "wrike", "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "openproject": 52, "weight": 16, "wrike": 68 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 2, "edge": "wrike", "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "openproject": 76, "weight": 13, "wrike": 78 }, { "by": 7, "edge": "openproject", "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "openproject": 70, "weight": 13, "wrike": 63 }, { "by": 1, "edge": "wrike", "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "openproject": 59, "weight": 14, "wrike": 60 }, { "by": 0, "edge": "", "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "openproject": 30, "weight": 10, "wrike": 30 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 12, "edge": "openproject", "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "openproject": 75, "weight": 7, "wrike": 63 }, { "by": 9, "edge": "openproject", "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "openproject": 87, "weight": 7, "wrike": 78 } ], "summary": "Wrike scores 60.1 (C) on agent readiness against OpenProject's 57.4 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. OpenProject leads on agent ergonomics, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do tasks create.", "verdicts": { "openproject": "OpenProject's APIv3 has a public OpenAPI 3.1 document with 320 operations, stable error identifiers and optimistic locking, and the same API ships in the free GPL-3.0 Community edition. No request limits are published, API tokens carry their user's full permissions, and 83 security advisories were published in the last twelve months, 13 rated critical.", "wrike": "The official MCP server has 29 documented tools for search, task and project creation, bulk updates, comments and approvals, and it works on every plan including Free. Permanent access tokens never expire and carry the user's full access, and no SLA, official SDK or deprecation policy was found in the reviewed documentation." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-wrike", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-wrike.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-wrike.md", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-wrike.min.md" }, "markdown": "Wrike scores 60.1 (C) on agent readiness against OpenProject's 57.4 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. OpenProject leads on agent ergonomics, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do tasks create.\n\n- OpenProject: grade C, 57.4/100, rank #550 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/openproject.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/openproject.json\n- Wrike: grade C, 60.1/100, rank #480 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/wrike.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/wrike.json\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### OpenProject (C)\n\nGood for: Teams that want a self-hostable or EU-hosted project tool with Gantt, time tracking and budgets, and an agent working through a documented REST API.\n\nAhead on:\n- Agent ergonomics, 70 against 63\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 75 against 63\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 87 against 78\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- Open source\n\nWatch for: 83 advisories published against opf/openproject in the twelve months to 8 October 2026, 13 rated critical, among them remote code execution and SQL injection\n\n### Wrike (C)\n\nGood for: Teams already on Wrike that want an assistant to find work, create tasks and projects from notes, update status in bulk, comment and check approvals.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 68 against 52\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install\n- Free to start without a card\n\nWatch for: A permanent access token never expires and reaches everything its user can, and it is the documented route for clients that need dynamic client registration\n\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | OpenProject | Wrike | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 52 | 68 | Wrike +16 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 76 | 78 | Wrike +2 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 70 | 63 | OpenProject +7 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 59 | 60 | Wrike +1 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 30 | 30 | even |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 75 | 63 | OpenProject +12 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 87 | 78 | OpenProject +9 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | -5 | -3 | |\n| **Total** | | **57.4 · C** | **60.1 · C** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | OpenProject | Wrike |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | OpenProject GmbH | Wrike, Inc. |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://www.wrike.com/api/v4` |\n| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |\n| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |\n| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | GPL-3.0 for the OpenProject source. Enterprise add-ons need a paid token, and OpenProject Enterprise cloud runs under OpenProject's Terms of Service | Proprietary service under Wrike's terms. The agent skills repository on GitHub is MIT |\n| Tools exposed | none | 29 |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |\n| llms.txt | no | yes |\n| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-09-17 |\n| Terms last updated | 2026-08-06 | 2025-04-08 |\n| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2026-06-01 |\n| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Popularity | 16k stars | none |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**OpenProject.** OpenProject's APIv3 has a public OpenAPI 3.1 document with 320 operations, stable error identifiers and optimistic locking, and the same API ships in the free GPL-3.0 Community edition. No request limits are published, API tokens carry their user's full permissions, and 83 security advisories were published in the last twelve months, 13 rated critical.\n\n**Wrike.** The official MCP server has 29 documented tools for search, task and project creation, bulk updates, comments and approvals, and it works on every plan including Free. Permanent access tokens never expire and carry the user's full access, and no SLA, official SDK or deprecation policy was found in the reviewed documentation.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### OpenProject\n\n1. Send the API token as `Authorization: Bearer \u003ctoken\u003e`, or as the Basic auth password with the user name `apikey`\n2. Read the resource first and send its current `lockVersion` with every PATCH. A stale value returns 409 `UpdateConflict`\n3. POST to the `/form` endpoint of a work package to learn writable fields and allowed values before creating or updating\n4. URL-encode `filters` as a JSON array, and add `pageSize`, `offset` and `select` to keep work package lists small\n5. Run the agent as a dedicated user with a narrow project role, and treat work package text and comments as untrusted input\n\n### Wrike\n\n1. Build API URLs from the `host` value returned by /oauth2/token. Accounts live on www.wrike.com, app-eu.wrike.com or app-us2.wrike.com, and the wrong host answers 401.\n2. Use https://mcp.wrike.com/v2 only. The older /app/mcp/stream and /app/mcp/sse URLs serve the v1 tool set.\n3. Call `search_workflows` before setting a status, because `update_items` and `search_items` take custom status ids.\n4. Stay under about 400 requests a minute per token or IP and back off exponentially on 429. Use POST /batch for up to 100 operations.\n5. Page task lists with `pageSize` (up to 1,000) and `nextPageToken`, and request optional data through `fields`.\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, OpenProject or Wrike?\n\nWrike scores 60.1 (C) on agent readiness against OpenProject's 57.4 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. OpenProject leads on agent ergonomics, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust.\n\n### Do OpenProject and Wrike need an API key?\n\nBoth take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.\n\n### Can an agent call OpenProject and Wrike without installing anything?\n\nNo hosted endpoint is listed for OpenProject. Wrike has a hosted endpoint at https://www.wrike.com/api/v4.\n\n### Are OpenProject and Wrike open source?\n\nOpenProject is open source (GPL-3.0 for the OpenProject source. Enterprise add-ons need a paid token, and OpenProject Enterprise cloud runs under OpenProject's Terms of Service). No open-source release is listed for Wrike.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-wrike.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-wrike.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"openproject\", \"b\": \"wrike\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare openproject wrike`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/openproject.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/wrike.json\n\n## Other comparisons with OpenProject or Wrike\n\n- [Asana vs OpenProject](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/asana-vs-openproject.md)\n- [Asana vs Wrike](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/asana-vs-wrike.md)\n- [Basecamp vs OpenProject](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/basecamp-vs-openproject.md)\n- [Basecamp vs Wrike](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/basecamp-vs-wrike.md)\n- [ClickUp vs OpenProject](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clickup-vs-openproject.md)\n- [ClickUp vs Wrike](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clickup-vs-wrike.md)\n- [monday.com vs OpenProject](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/monday-vs-openproject.md)\n- [monday.com vs Wrike](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/monday-vs-wrike.md)\n- [OpenProject vs Plane](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-plane.md)\n- [OpenProject vs Roma](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-roma.md)\n- [OpenProject vs Shortcut](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-shortcut.md)\n- [OpenProject vs Taiga](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-taiga.md)\n- [OpenProject vs Teamwork.com](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-teamwork.md)\n- [OpenProject vs Todoist](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-todoist.md)\n- [OpenProject vs Trello](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-trello.md)\n- [OpenProject vs YouTrack](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-youtrack.md)\n- [Plane vs Wrike](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/plane-vs-wrike.md)\n- [Roma vs Wrike](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/roma-vs-wrike.md)\n- [Shortcut vs Wrike](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/shortcut-vs-wrike.md)\n- [Taiga vs Wrike](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/taiga-vs-wrike.md)\n- [Teamwork.com vs Wrike](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/teamwork-vs-wrike.md)\n- [Todoist vs Wrike](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/todoist-vs-wrike.md)\n- [Trello vs Wrike](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/trello-vs-wrike.md)\n- [Wrike vs YouTrack](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/wrike-vs-youtrack.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-10-09", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.4", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "OpenProject vs Wrike", "url": "" } ], "description": "Wrike scores 60.1 (C) on agent readiness against OpenProject's 57.4 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. OpenProject leads on agent ergonomics, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do tasks create. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by…", "facts": [ "OpenProject C 57.4", "Wrike C 60.1", "scores" ], "h1": "OpenProject vs Wrike", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/compare-openproject-vs-wrike.png", "path": "/compare/openproject-vs-wrike", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "OpenProject vs Wrike for AI agents, C 57.4 vs C 60.1 | Anchor Terminal", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-10-09", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-wrike" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 2450, "slim": 680 }, "version": 1 }