# OpenMausBot vs Paperclip (slim)

> OpenMausBot scores 65.4 (B) to Paperclip's 59 (C) for multi-agent orchestration. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openmausbot-vs-paperclip.md (~3,700 tokens) · this version ~630 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openmausbot-vs-paperclip.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openmausbot-vs-paperclip
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-30
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

OpenMausBot scores 65.4 (B) on agent readiness against Paperclip's 59 (C), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Paperclip leads on reliability, security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do multi-agent orchestration.

- OpenMausBot: B 65.4, rank #368 of 1239 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/openmausbot.min.md
- Paperclip: C 59, rank #662 of 1239 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip.min.md
- OpenMausBot, good for A person or an outside agent who wants several CLI agents (Claude Code, Codex, Grok, ACP CLIs) organised as named bots with their own computers, routines and approvals, driven by MCP or a CLI. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 90 against 81; Agent ergonomics, 77 against 70. Also Runs on your own machine.
- Paperclip, good for Someone running several coding or operations agents who wants one place for tasks, budgets, approvals and history across harnesses. Ahead on Reliability, 66 against 60; Security & auth, 64 against 59; Payments & pricing, 60 against 50; Transparency & trust, 66 against 59.

| Category | OpenMausBot | Paperclip |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 60 | 66 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 90 | 81 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 77 | 70 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 59 | 64 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 50 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 74 | 78 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 59 | 66 |

| Fact (where they differ) | OpenMausBot | Paperclip |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Supamaus Software Private Limited | Paperclip Labs, Inc. |
| Transports | stdio |  |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Tools exposed | 20 | none |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-30 | 2026-10-05 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-10 | 2026-07-23 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-18 | 2026-07-23 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes, with an opt-out |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | 8.2k stars, 3.5k npm/wk | 99k stars, 60k npm/wk |