# OpenInstinct vs Tab (slim) > OpenInstinct scores 21.8 (F) to Tab's 10.7 (F) for assistants reached by message. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side. - Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openinstinct-vs-tab-bot.md (~3,350 tokens) · this version ~480 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openinstinct-vs-tab-bot.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openinstinct-vs-tab-bot - Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-13 OpenInstinct scores 21.8 (F) on agent readiness against Tab's 10.7 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistants reached by message. - OpenInstinct: F 21.8, rank #988 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/openinstinct.min.md - Tab: F 10.7, rank #1003 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/tab-bot.min.md - OpenInstinct, good for Developers comfortable running their own iMessage assistant on Vercel with a browser agent and Link wallet. Ahead on Reliability, 33 against 5; Payments & pricing, 50 against 0; Maintenance & community, 66 against 58; Transparency & trust, 59 against 45. Also Open source. - Tab, good for A person who wants a texting assistant that browses, calls and buys with tight checkout controls. | Category | OpenInstinct | Tab | | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability (16%) | 33 | 5 | | Performance (10%) | pending | pending | | Schema & documentation (13%) | 0 | 0 | | Agent ergonomics (13%) | 0 | 0 | | Security & auth (14%) | 0 | 4 | | Payments & pricing (10%) | 50 | 0 | | Task success (10%) | pending | pending | | Maintenance & community (7%) | 66 | 58 | | Transparency & trust (7%) | 59 | 45 | | Fact (where they differ) | OpenInstinct | Tab | | --- | --- | --- | | Vendor | Merit Systems, Inc. | Terrasoft, Inc. | | Pricing | Free | Paid | | Licence | MIT (Copyright 2026 Merit Systems, Inc.). | Closed service under Tab's Terms of Use (Terrasoft, Inc., effective 2 September 2026). | | Last release | 2026-10-05 | none |